Keefaz Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Let me begin with this gem. But....when I complained about the Mirror the more mouthy types on here attacked me and said the Mirror was doing it "tongue-in-cheek" Surely you must be mistaken ? Or the mouthy types are yapping dickheads, both are good... Ah right ! The "tongue in cheek" Mirror Defence League has surfaced again ! And oh ! It's by the same "journalist" - the one whom the usual suspects defend to the death...how heartwarming that all he ever does is "tongue in cheek" - how sneer-worthy that some on here clap their hands like seals in a circus at his "wit" Two different articles: one with glaring factual errors and one that you failed to understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Two different articles: one with glaring factual errors and one that you failed to understand. Really ? Or are we back to "tongue in cheek" again ? The character involved there has a previous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 BEEF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 BEEF. Nice with fried onion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Let me begin with this gem. But....when I complained about the Mirror the more mouthy types on here attacked me and said the Mirror was doing it "tongue-in-cheek" Surely you must be mistaken ? Or the mouthy types are yapping dickheads, both are good... Ah right ! The "tongue in cheek" Mirror Defence League has surfaced again ! And oh ! It's by the same "journalist" - the one whom the usual suspects defend to the death...how heartwarming that all he ever does is "tongue in cheek" - how sneer-worthy that some on here clap their hands like seals in a circus at his "wit" mouthy ?.......or some who wanted to comment on it (much in the same way you did). I'm no fan of the mirror,just read the sports headlines if someone has it in their possession, i could see attempted humour in the piece whereas you saw a serious hatchet piece. "defend to the death"......was that wit ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Really thought this was going to be a tribute thread to Kezman. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 I've not really had enough published I think. But I appreciate the love. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Part 2: http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/david-maddock/Why-John-Barnes-deserves-more-time-from-Tranmere-s-board-and-fans-article167921.html I'm not sure if you can call these columns journalism though if they can't even get in The Mirror. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now