Mick Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 I blame the pair of them, equally At least we now know that you weren't on the Premier League Arbitration Panel which was presented with all of the facts and came to a decision that Keegan was shit on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Michael F Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 How Newcastle fans can get behind Keegan after the cunt walks out leaving us in the shit (playing a massive part in us going down) then suing us for every single penny he can get, is beyond me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 How Newcastle fans can get behind Keegan after the c*** walks out leaving us in the s*** (playing a massive part in us going down) then suing us for every single penny he can get, is beyond me He was right to walk, he wasn't being allowed to do his job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Michael F Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 So what does he do? What he always does, quits. Time to end this love for Keegan lads, he's a prick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 So what does he do? What he always does, quits. Time to end this love for Keegan lads, he's a prick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 So what does he do? What he always does, quits. Time to end this love for Keegan lads, he's a prick The "prick" has done more for the club than anybody else in my lifetime, he deserves some respect for that. He managed us for 5 years the first time and transformed us from a club heading towards the third division into a club challenging to win the league title. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 How Newcastle fans can get behind Keegan after the c*** walks out leaving us in the s*** (playing a massive part in us going down) then suing us for every single penny he can get, is beyond me He was right to walk, he wasn't being allowed to do his job. he wasn't as reagrds gonzalez....i'd like to know the details of the rest though.......wouldn't you ? (who was to blame if anyone for modric falling through ? who wanted bassong/guthrie ? who killed the dierdyok deal ? was their anything in the schweinsteiger story ? who did keegan want ? who got jonas/coloccini ? who finally decided on milner ?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Michael F Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads souness does hint at not being given the final say on a transfer or two. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 he wasn't as reagrds gonzalez....i'd like to know the details of the rest though.......wouldn't you ? (who was to blame if anyone for modric falling through ? who wanted bassong/guthrie ? who killed the dierdyok deal ? was their anything in the schweinsteiger story ? who did keegan want ? who got jonas/coloccini ? who finally decided on milner ?) Of course he was right over Gonzalez, he didn't want him at the club and Wise still brought him in anyway. The Arbitration Panel didn't go any further than the Gonzalez deal because they didn't have to, it was case proven and anything more would have been pointless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 he wasn't as reagrds gonzalez....i'd like to know the details of the rest though.......wouldn't you ? (who was to blame if anyone for modric falling through ? who wanted bassong/guthrie ? who killed the dierdyok deal ? was their anything in the schweinsteiger story ? who did keegan want ? who got jonas/coloccini ? who finally decided on milner ?) Of course he was right over Gonzalez, he didn't want him at the club and Wise still brought him in anyway. The Arbitration Panel didn't go any further than the Gonzalez deal because they didn't have to, it was case proven and anything more would have been pointless. so the rest has no bearing on what happened throughout the summer. are you not remotely interested in what was happening ? doesn't it strike you as strange that if that had been happening all summer the main prosecution argument is over a loan signing not colccini or a permanent signing ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads Allardyce and Souness both walked away with more than Keegan and they both deserved to go because of team performance. Keegan was shit on by his employer and was rightly compensated for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads Allardyce and Souness both walked away with more than Keegan and they both deserved to go because of team performance. Keegan was s*** on by his employer and was rightly compensated for it. souness reckons he had players bought/sold above him so he has the same excuse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 souness does hint at not being given the final say on a transfer or two. Souness spent almost £50 million and didn't complain once while he was here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 souness does hint at not being given the final say on a transfer or two. Souness spent almost £50 million and didn't complain once while he was here. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-508045/Souness-sounds-warning-man-dares-Geordies.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 so the rest has no bearing on what happened throughout the summer. are you not remotely interested in what was happening ? doesn't it strike you as strange that if that had been happening all summer the main prosecution argument is over a loan signing not colccini or a permanent signing ? The rest obviously had no bearing on the case, the panel said as much. I would have been interested to know about other deals but it wasn't necessary. I doubt it was the only deal done behind Keegans back as it was described as the final straw, or something like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Michael F Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Nor did Keegan, it was all 'I have final say on transfers', he said that just after Milner was sold. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-508045/Souness-sounds-warning-man-dares-Geordies.html That could easily be Souness trying to repair his reputation. If it was true than he should have said something at the time and we might have seen the back of him sooner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 so the rest has no bearing on what happened throughout the summer. are you not remotely interested in what was happening ? doesn't it strike you as strange that if that had been happening all summer the main prosecution argument is over a loan signing not colccini or a permanent signing ? The rest obviously had no bearing on the case, the panel said as much. I would have been interested to know about other deals but it wasn't necessary. I doubt it wasn't the only deal done behind Keegans back as it was described as the final straw, or something like that. it doesn't have a bearing on the case but it has a massive bearing on what was happening at the club. basically the case would rest on one instance of the manager being overuled on a signing.(like robson,hughes,benitez, and mourinho all have been) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Nor did Keegan, it was all 'I have final say on transfers', he said that just after Milner was sold. I'm not sure what you're getting at. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads Come off it you BNP sympathiser. Ashley was proven to be wrong in a court of law. Had he not fucked around so much and had he been in the right he would not be paying KK's legal fees. If he could go for a couple of seconds without being such a MASSIVE CUNT he probably wouldn't have lost the club so much money. Outrageous you could claim otherwise you ashleyette. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads Come off it you BNP sympathiser. Ashley was proven to be wrong in a court of law. Had he not f***ed around so much and had he been in the right he would not be paying KK's legal fees. If he could go for a couple of seconds without being such a MASSIVE c*** he probably wouldn't have lost the club so much money. Outrageous you could claim otherwise you ashleyette. it wasn't a court of law...i wish it had been. everything would have came to light. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-508045/Souness-sounds-warning-man-dares-Geordies.html That could easily be Souness trying to repair his reputation. If it was true than he should have said something at the time and we might have seen the back of him sooner. why would he, plenty of managers have put up with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Michael F Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads Come off it you BNP sympathiser. Ashley was proven to be wrong in a court of law. Had he not f***ed around so much and had he been in the right he would not be paying KK's legal fees. If he could go for a couple of seconds without being such a MASSIVE c*** he probably wouldn't have lost the club so much money. Outrageous you could claim otherwise you ashleyette. BNP and Ashleyette Keegan and Ashley both played a massive part in us going down. Too many of our fans need to remove their dicks from Keegans arse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Righto so you're sentimental fair play. Had it been Allardyce or Souness 'not allowed his job' then tried suing us for whatever he can get, would everyone take his side? Answers on a postcard lads Come off it you BNP sympathiser. Ashley was proven to be wrong in a court of law. Had he not f***ed around so much and had he been in the right he would not be paying KK's legal fees. If he could go for a couple of seconds without being such a MASSIVE c*** he probably wouldn't have lost the club so much money. Outrageous you could claim otherwise you ashleyette. BNP and Ashleyette Keegan and Ashley both played a massive part in us going down. Too many of our fans need to remove their dicks from Keegans arse KK played a huge part in us going down despite being in charge for only 3/38 games and getting us above expected points from them? edit: was going to apologise for bnp until i realised i had the right man http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,64418.msg2035733.html#msg2035733 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now