Mark Hughes

[Dave]

  On 28/12/2009 at 22:00, OzzieMandias said:

Not really an argument, even.

 

You're the one assuring people would be doing and saying this, that and the other.

[OzzieMandias]

  On 28/12/2009 at 22:01, Dave said:

  Quote

Not really an argument, even.

 

You're the one assuring people would be doing and saying this, that and the other.

 

Well, that's not an argument, is it?

[Cronky]

  On 28/12/2009 at 21:24, Dave said:

Kind of a pointless argument seeing as neither viewpoint can be proven right.

 

This would be a very empty forum if it only contained viewpoints that could be proven.

 

Shearer has status with a lot of fans and gets cut a lot of slack. You can disagree, but it's not exactly an outrageous opinion with no foundation.

[Dave]

Appears to me to be just another excuse to have a go at Shearer, when nobody even mentioned him in this discussion.

[Thespence]

  On 28/12/2009 at 21:13, bobyule said:

  Quote

  Quote

Imagine if Shearer had been managing us this season, and we were in the exact same position now, seven points clear at Christmas – people would be threatening to riot if there was talk of replacing him with Hughes after promotion.

Depends on whether the performances had been the same

 

Come on now. He'd be hailed as a tactical genius for getting results from such a poor set of players.

 

And a shit owner you forgot to mention that.