Skirge Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Skirge mate, I'm not being funny but please stop posting this utter shit. ah now Dave he may be ITK you don't know AND is this not the point of this thread ? You come in here you know its going to be twitter bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Skirge mate, I'm not being funny but please stop posting this utter s***. . That's the idea of the thread though. He's putting it in the correct thread If you don't want to read it don't open it up! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Skirge mate, I'm not being funny but please stop posting this utter s***. . That's the idea of the thread though. He's putting it in the correct thread If you don't want to read it don't open it up! well said Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Not an excuse, that sad cunt is vindicated by you spreading his lies. At the very least let's have rumours from people whose job it is to produce them. Not any old wanker with 10 followers making shit up for the attention. And that includes that 'Colin'. I'd rather bin the thread tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 If the thread title says bollocks surely anything goes? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 No. This kind of stuff literally isn't worth paying the hosting for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Not an excuse, that sad cunt is vindicated by you spreading his lies. At the very least let's have rumours from people whose job it is to produce them. Not any old wanker with 10 followers making shit up for the attention. And that includes that 'Colin'. I'd rather bin the thread tbh. But if its from the likes of Ryder and Dougless it go's in the transfer rumours in the press thread. This thread is for twitter bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Dave I find this thread one if the most amusing in the window. I know 99% of it is s***, but I come on the board sometimes to read this s***! Ffs you've got a thread titled not worthy if a thread. If there's a waste of hosting space surely it's that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 As you wish. I just think we're way past scraping the bottom of the barrel here. There's literally no merit in this stuff - it's 100% made up by people who aren't even trying. I heard we're signing Wayne Rooney for £8m. HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Twitter Transfer News/Bollocks - keep it all in here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Have to say I'm with Dave here. This thread isn't for that level of bollocks IMO. Otherwise every other Tweet would be in here. Not worth the breathing space. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 As you wish. You know you love it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Have to say I'm with Dave here. This thread isn't for that level of bollocks IMO. Otherwise every other Tweet would be in here. Not worth the breathing space. So who clarifies it as bollocks?, is this some kind of mind control rule? You may see it as utter bullshit others may believe what has been tweeted, if you have a thread for twitter bollocks then surely all tweets count. Non of us know tat bloke from Adam he may be in the know, I doubt he is but he could be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Thread title Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Aye, I'm siding with Dave too. You want to read the insider gossip from a 12 year old's imagination, look on Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Thread title And Dave will still whine at what gets posted in here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Might as well name it 'The Spacker Thread. For spackers.' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest je85 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 How does this shit work it's way on to your timelines? Don't follow the dumb cunts making it up/retweeting it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Might as well name it 'The Spacker Thread. For spackers.' No, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 If this thread has taught me anything its never sign up to twitter, why would anyone would follow these lunatics? Even the actual journo's talk shit most the time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Dave v Twitter is an early contender for 2012 Feud of the Year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Have to say I'm with Dave here. This thread isn't for that level of bollocks IMO. Otherwise every other Tweet would be in here. Not worth the breathing space. So who clarifies it as bollocks?, is this some kind of mind control rule? You may see it as utter bullshit others may believe what has been tweeted, if you have a thread for twitter bollocks then surely all tweets count. Non of us know tat bloke from Adam he may be in the know, I doubt he is but he could be. It's quite easy. - Posts from journos like Ryder and Douglas - NUFC Transfer Rumours Thread - Posts with shitty media sources - this thread - Posts from 12 year old cocks who are making every word up - the bin There's literally no point to posting a Tweet from a randomer pretending to be ITK. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Might as well name it 'The Spacker Thread. For spackers.' No, tbh. Might as well. It'll be a laugh, you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Dave v Twitter is an early contender for 2012 Feud of the Year. I quite like Twitter tbh, it's great for getting news as it happens. But only if you follow people worthy of the effort of one mouse click. Which most are not. Anyway fuck it, I'm not going to say people can't post this new level of tripe. Just that they shouldn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Might as well name it 'The Spacker Thread. For spackers.' No, tbh. Might as well. It'll be a laugh, you know. Do you know anyone with cerebral palsy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now