TheGuv Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 I'm not clicking your links. There'll be a catch somewhere, more than likely you're on commission to help fund your hamster addiction. http://edge.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/166932/81698562.jpg http://community.klipsch.com/forums/storage/4/805837/614_image_21.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 :lol: In one. Literally?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skryp2nit3 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Sports Direct adverts take up about 90% of the fixed hoarding in the stadium; we're supposed to believe that nobody wants to advertise in any of those positions? Righto. Couldn't care less as long as the team is competing well in the upper echelons of the EPL and Europe consistently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-wire/mike-ashley-must-let-newcastle-fans-see-their-team/ Good article. He needs to sort this out tbf. It's a joke really. The thing is if we get more tickets at away grounds then those same teams will also want an increase in away allocations meaning less home tickets will be on sale at SJP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-wire/mike-ashley-must-let-newcastle-fans-see-their-team/ Good article. He needs to sort this out tbf. It's a joke really. The thing is if we get more tickets at away grounds then those same teams will also want an increase in away allocations meaning less home tickets will be on sale at SJP. Really? We offer 3k to everyteam and only 6-8 sell them out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-wire/mike-ashley-must-let-newcastle-fans-see-their-team/ Good article. He needs to sort this out tbf. It's a joke really. The thing is if we get more tickets at away grounds then those same teams will also want an increase in away allocations meaning less home tickets will be on sale at SJP. Really? We offer 3k to everyteam and only 6-8 sell them out. Premier league rules state you have to offer clubs at least 3k. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-wire/mike-ashley-must-let-newcastle-fans-see-their-team/ Good article. He needs to sort this out tbf. It's a joke really. Great article. Absolutely hate our policy on away games at the moment, that's why I hope Blackburn, Wigan and Bolton don't go down because we always get 4k+ away tickets for them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-wire/mike-ashley-must-let-newcastle-fans-see-their-team/ Good article. He needs to sort this out tbf. It's a joke really. The thing is if we get more tickets at away grounds then those same teams will also want an increase in away allocations meaning less home tickets will be on sale at SJP. Really? We offer 3k to everyteam and only 6-8 sell them out. Premier league rules state you have to offer clubs at least 3k. Those teams that offer us more tickets are usually those who can't sell out their own stadiums and have poor away followings. So don't know where you're coming from. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Mark Douglas @MsiDouglas Mike Ashley is 36th richest man in the UK says Sun Times. £1,750,000,000 fortune.... Don't think he'll be calling in that £120m loan soon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Doubled his fortune in 2 years due to very good Sports Direct performance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveMc Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Doubled his fortune in 2 years due to very good Sports Direct performance. A relatively small proportion of his fortune is liquid though. Much of it is tied up in his business interests long term Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 What kind of liquid? Knowing Sports Direct it'll be council pop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Doubled his fortune in 2 years due to very good Sports Direct performance. A relatively small proportion of his fortune is liquid though. Much of it is tied up in his business interests long term is it ? how much is liquid after the floatation and buy back. doubt he'll have a billion in the bank but he'll not be wandering round SJP after games looking for dropped change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Doubled his fortune in 2 years due to very good Sports Direct performance. A relatively small proportion of his fortune is liquid though. Much of it is tied up in his business interests long term is it ? how much is liquid after the floatation and buy back. doubt he'll have a billion in the bank but he'll not be wandering round SJP after games looking for dropped change. completely unrelated to Neesy's post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Doubled his fortune in 2 years due to very good Sports Direct performance. A relatively small proportion of his fortune is liquid though. Much of it is tied up in his business interests long term is it ? how much is liquid after the floatation and buy back. doubt he'll have a billion in the bank but he'll not be wandering round SJP after games looking for dropped change. completely unrelated to Neesy's post but totally related to steveMc's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Doubled his fortune in 2 years due to very good Sports Direct performance. A relatively small proportion of his fortune is liquid though. Much of it is tied up in his business interests long term If most of his wealth is tied up in Sports Direct then it is very liquid since he can easily just sell his shares tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Hmm majority shareholder dumps shares tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Hmm majority shareholder dumps shares tomorrow. or he could re-start paying dividends or give himelf a pay rise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveMc Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Rich list says he's worth 1.75bn and his shares in sd make up 1.25 of that. Take the point that he could sell them but he won't and so though clearly not skint he's ney roman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 And won't put anything else into the club before FFP rules come in, it's infuriating tbh, now is the time to maximize capital investment in the club to the hilt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 And won't put anything else into the club before FFP rules come in, it's infuriating tbh, now is the time to maximize capital investment in the club to the hilt. it really isn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 And won't put anything else into the club before FFP rules come in, it's infuriating tbh, now is the time to maximize capital investment in the club to the hilt. it really isn't. Explain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 And won't put anything else into the club before FFP rules come in, it's infuriating tbh, now is the time to maximize capital investment in the club to the hilt. it really isn't. Explain. i don't find it infuriating when someone who has already put a lot of money in, is unlikely to get it all back, doesn't put more in. especially when we carp on about the man city's and chelseas of this world you want us to do the same but on a smaller scale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 And won't put anything else into the club before FFP rules come in, it's infuriating tbh, now is the time to maximize capital investment in the club to the hilt. it really isn't. Explain. i don't find it infuriating when someone who has already put a lot of money in, is unlikely to get it all back, doesn't put more in. especially when we carp on about the man city's and chelseas of this world you want us to do the same but on a smaller scale. I find it infuriating, so u can't just say that I don't The guy is one of the richest men in England, and he won't improve the ground/commercial aspects with capital investment that he won't be able to now from FFP rules Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts