Jump to content

Dwight Gayle (now playing for Hibernian)


astraguy

How do you feel about Dwight Gayle's contract extension?  

657 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about Dwight Gayle's contract extension?

    • Delighted
      3
    • Happy
      0
    • Mixed emotions
      3
    • Unhappy
      3
    • The club is a joke
      40

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's not the way the world works

 

It's the way football works, though  [emoji38]

Nah its not. If we score the whole game is completely different

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's not the way the world works

 

It's the way football works, though  :lol:

 

Jesus Christ you are thick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't even remember this sitter he apparently missed

 

He had a back post header from a Ritchie cross with just the keeper to beat and mistimed it heading off their defender with it heading off target, if that's the one you mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's not the way the world works

 

It's the way football works, though  :lol:

 

Jesus Christ you are thick.

 

How so, Greg?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's nonsense like, your criticism is with Gayle, not the officials.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's not the way the world works

 

It's the way football works, though  :lol:

 

Jesus Christ you are thick.

 

How so, Greg?

I was a bit harsh.

 

You don't seem to understand how football works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man :lol:

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being shite or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's nonsense like, your criticism is with Gayle, not the officials.

 

To me, if the officials decide a goal is offside, I move on and so should the player involved. Gayle had 90 minutes to score a goal deemed legitimate, and he didn't, regardless of whether you view his goal on or offside. Therefore my original post of 'didn't do much' is perfectly valid. Because he didn't do much, did he?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's nonsense like, your criticism is with Gayle, not the officials.

 

To me, if the officials decide a goal is offside, I move on and so should the player involved. Gayle had 90 minutes to score a goal deemed legitimate, and he didn't, regardless of whether you view his goal on or offside. Therefore my original post of 'didn't do much' is perfectly valid. Because he didn't do much, did he?

 

:facepalm:

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man :lol:

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

Saying he "didn't do much" is hardly berating him like mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man :lol:

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

At this level, since his initial first season where he was an unknown quantity and mainly a supersub, he's not exactly pulled up many trees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man [emoji38]

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

Saying he "didn't do much" is hardly berating him like mate.

Saying he's worse than Joselu is though [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's nonsense like, your criticism is with Gayle, not the officials.

 

To me, if the officials decide a goal is offside, I move on and so should the player involved. Gayle had 90 minutes to score a goal deemed legitimate, and he didn't, regardless of whether you view his goal on or offside. Therefore my original post of 'didn't do much' is perfectly valid. Because he didn't do much, did he?

 

:facepalm:

 

Care to elaborate Greg?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man [emoji38]

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

Saying he "didn't do much" is hardly berating him like mate.

Saying he's worse than Joselu is though [emoji38]

 

I prefer Joselu in the team aye, as shown today he wins things in the air and creates possession for us in the opponents half. Gayle doesn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man :lol:

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

Saying he "didn't do much" is hardly berating him like mate.

You said he's our 3rd choice striker. Your whole argument is quite clearly based around criticising him too.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

 

 

Think the words I used was 'he didn't do much'. And he didn't. If he had scored we would have drew the match 1-1. The linesman decided he didn't score so he didn't. We don't make these decisions. Gayle had the chance to rectify it as I just said, and he failed to take it.

That's nonsense like, your criticism is with Gayle, not the officials.

 

To me, if the officials decide a goal is offside, I move on and so should the player involved. Gayle had 90 minutes to score a goal deemed legitimate, and he didn't, regardless of whether you view his goal on or offside. Therefore my original post of 'didn't do much' is perfectly valid. Because he didn't do much, did he?

 

Fucking hell. [emoji38]

 

So because the ref disallowed his perfectly fine goal, that means it didn't happen and it's Gayle's fault. Flawless logic. [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man [emoji38]

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

Saying he "didn't do much" is hardly berating him like mate.

Saying he's worse than Joselu is though [emoji38]

 

I prefer Joselu in the team aye, as shown today he wins things in the air and creates possession for us in the opponents half. Gayle doesn't.

Aye but Gayle actually looks like he might score, which is the point of football

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man [emoji38]

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

Saying he "didn't do much" is hardly berating him like mate.

Saying he's worse than Joselu is though [emoji38]

 

I prefer Joselu in the team aye, as shown today he wins things in the air and creates possession for us in the opponents half. Gayle doesn't.

Aye but Gayle actually looks like he might score, which is the point of football

 

Needs a target man next to him to look at all useful though. I'd sooner see the Mitrovic/Perez partnership given a chance. There's chemistry there and they are balanced as a pairing.

 

Doubt we'll keep playing two up top so reverting back to 4231, Gayle becomes totally ineffective unfortunately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looked sharp as anything for the first 30 minutes or so then understandably got tired and completely drifted out of the game. The fact he still looked more effective than Joselu even when he barely moved is quite a damning indictment of our current strikeforce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's started one game in dokeys and look fine. Scored a goal that was probably unfairly chalked off and you're focusing on him missing a good chance to berate him? Howay man :lol:

 

His finishing is good, that's never been an issue. Him missing one good chance isn't evidence of him being s**** or that he will consistently be missing sitters.

 

Saying he "didn't do much" is hardly berating him like mate.

You said he's our 3rd choice striker. Your whole argument is quite clearly based around criticising him too.

 

Well yeah I am criticising him because I don't think he does enough. Same as Mitrovic, same as Joselu, same as Perez. Not sure why people are so quick to defend Gayle and not the others as much. Just reinstating some balance to the N-O  :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...