Jump to content

Notts Forest 2 - 1 Newcastle United - 02/12/16 - Both red cards rescinded by FA


Recommended Posts

Guest neesy111

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Post it then.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10242286/ifab-anounces-law-changes-softening-rules-on-fouls-in-the-penalty-area

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Post it then.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10242286/ifab-anounces-law-changes-softening-rules-on-fouls-in-the-penalty-area

 

Er Neesy, in that article :D

 

Players will still be sent off for holding, pulling or pushing, not playing the ball or having no possibility to play the ball, serious foul play, violent conduct or deliberate handball

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst thing that could have happened was to concede an early goal in this half. They have all the imputes now and of course 2 extra men. Three defeats on the bounce is worrying, despite the manner they've come in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself)

That was an accidental foul by dummett.  If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Post it then.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10242286/ifab-anounces-law-changes-softening-rules-on-fouls-in-the-penalty-area

 

The rules posted are the actual laws, not a sky representation. It's no longer an automatic red card but still can be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself)

That was an accidental foul by dummett.  If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh.

 

 

we all know the rules, but if as has happened the ref sees it as deliberate ya fucked, simple

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself)

That was an accidental foul by dummett.  If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh.

 

Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst thing that could have happened was to concede an early goal in this half. They have all the imputes now and of course 2 extra men. Three defeats on the bounce is worrying, despite the manner they've come in.

 

Didn't lose against Hull tbf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself)

That was an accidental foul by dummett.  If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh.

 

Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong.

You said it's a red, which it's not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself)

That was an accidental foul by dummett.  If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh.

[emoji38]

 

What seems to be the problem?

 

Well Dr, I was wondering if you could check my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity.

 

I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions.

 

Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! [emoji38]

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card.

 

No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

You need to read the rules

 

So do you....

 

Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless:

 

The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or

The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or

The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.)

 

In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion.

 

Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself)

That was an accidental foul by dummett.  If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh.

 

Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong.

You said it's a red, which it's not.

 

It's like arguing with a woman.

 

No, I've not once said it's a red. I said the ref had a choice, in response to you saying he didn't know the laws.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...