Keegans Export Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 He was the same with our takeover, wouldn't give any specifics about anything. I just assume he's such an idiot he doesn't trust himself not to say something he shouldn't so he just says nothing at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, The Prophet said: I'm sure I read he's under a gag order. The only thing he's gagging on is Todd Boehly's broccoli floret Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 https://www.footballinsider247.com/newcastle-united-lead-premier-league-rebel-group-ahead-of-crunch-vote-sources/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: https://www.footballinsider247.com/newcastle-united-lead-premier-league-rebel-group-ahead-of-crunch-vote-sources/ I find it hard to believe this guy knows the intricacies of one of the biggest votes in PL history Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 22 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: https://www.footballinsider247.com/newcastle-united-lead-premier-league-rebel-group-ahead-of-crunch-vote-sources/ This suggests that it's unlikely to pass. If the "big six" are against it, we only need one abstention/vote against and it gets shot down. Quote The proposal has received heavy criticism from the ‘Big Six’ who argue that the rules would harm English football’s presence in European football. A vote will take place for anchoring regulations on Monday (29 April) where a majority of 14 votes will be needed for the proposal to pass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 hours ago, Whitley mag said: https://www.footballinsider247.com/newcastle-united-lead-premier-league-rebel-group-ahead-of-crunch-vote-sources/ If NUFC are at the head of that group, that’s not exactly suggestive of them being confident in increasing revenues in line with the clubs at the top … Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 7 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: If NUFC are at the head of that group, that’s not exactly suggestive of them being confident in increasing revenues in line with the clubs at the top … think you might be reaching a bit there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 7 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: If NUFC are at the head of that group, that’s not exactly suggestive of them being confident in increasing revenues in line with the clubs at the top … It's another article that seems to think the "anchoring" rules are to replace the 85% cap rather than run alongside. Quote Current Profit and Sustainability Rules are set to be scrapped in the 2025-26 season with new regulations permitting clubs to spend up to 85 per cent of their overall revenue on player wages and transfer fees. However, concerns have been raised that such rules would allow the established elite to dominate and stop other clubs from competing at the top of the table. Therefore, new “anchoring” rules have been proposed which would cap spending to a multiple of the lowest earnings in the division. Kieran Maguire must think the same judging by his comments about us and Villa. It's not how I've interpreted it but there doesn't seem to be a clear answer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 If true this could really be bad news and very costly for some. Mainly some of the talk sport LADS with their "banter". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 14 minutes ago, Jack27 said: think you might be reaching a bit there Probably - but such a move would only anchor NUFC in the future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mase Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Scotty66 said: If true this could really be bad news and very costly for some. Mainly some of the talk sport LADS with their "banter". Just spotted this on one of our forums. We’ve been asking for the club to stick up for itself for years. They’ve played the “if we just don’t say anything they’ll leave us alone” card for too long. The nonsense Carragher has been allowed to spout - he should be number one on that list. Closely followed by Simon Jordan. It’s all well and good having opinions but some of these professional pundits have crossed the line a few times. The constant “state owned” line from Carragher - when we’re not owned by one entity let alone state, the underlying racist tones of “oil money” thats thrown about, and still is by Man U fans that mustn’t understand what INEOS do. I for one can’t wait! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, TheBrownBottle said: Probably - but such a move would only anchor NUFC in the future. I wouldn’t believe a word football insider says tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Scotty66 said: If true this could really be bad news and very costly for some. Mainly some of the talk sport LADS with their "banter". Or a threat against journalists by a dictatorship’s collection of paid hands in an attempt to silence them. It’s a PL tribunal not a criminal trial. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mase Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, TheBrownBottle said: Or a threat against journalists by a dictatorship’s collection of paid hands in an attempt to silence them. It’s a PL tribunal not a criminal trial. If found guilty an appeal would go to the High Court, no? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Mase said: Just spotted this on one of our forums. We’ve been asking for the club to stick up for itself for years. They’ve played the “if we just don’t say anything they’ll leave us alone” card for too long. The nonsense Carragher has been allowed to spout - he should be number one on that list. Closely followed by Simon Jordan. It’s all well and good having opinions but some of these professional pundits have crossed the line a few times. The constant “state owned” line from Carragher - when we’re not owned by one entity let alone state, the underlying racist tones of “oil money” thats thrown about, and still is by Man U fans that mustn’t understand what INEOS do. I for one can’t wait! I don’t think it is racist at all to question state ownership of football clubs - particularly when those states are dictatorships with appalling human rights records Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mase Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) 2 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: I don’t think it is racist at all to question state ownership of football clubs - particularly when those states are dictatorships with appalling human rights records City aren’t state owned. We’re owned by CFG - The group is owned by three organisations, of which 81% is majority-owned by Abu Dhabi United Group, 18% by the American firm Silver Lake, and 1% by Chinese firms China Media Capital and CITIC Capital. Hope that helps you sleep better tonight mate. Edited April 26 by Mase Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 29 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: If NUFC are at the head of that group, that’s not exactly suggestive of them being confident in increasing revenues in line with the clubs at the top … Howay man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Mase said: If found guilty an appeal would go to the High Court, no? I thought the High Court had already rejected an appeal from the Commercial Court a couple of years ago? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Mase said: City aren’t state owned. We’re owned by CFG - The group is owned by three organisations, of which 81% is majority-owned by Abu Dhabi United Group, 18% by the American firm Silver Lake, and 1% by Chinese firms China Media Capital and CITIC Capital. Hope that helps you sleep better tonight mate. Yep, and NUFC are owner 80% by PIF, not the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Pull the other one man; if there’s any group of supporters who knows what a load of bollocks the ‘Abu Dhabi Group’ being separate from the city state of Abu Dhabi is, it is us. The govt manages Abu Dhabi group. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 5 minutes ago, Mase said: Just spotted this on one of our forums. We’ve been asking for the club to stick up for itself for years. They’ve played the “if we just don’t say anything they’ll leave us alone” card for too long. The nonsense Carragher has been allowed to spout - he should be number one on that list. Closely followed by Simon Jordan. It’s all well and good having opinions but some of these professional pundits have crossed the line a few times. The constant “state owned” line from Carragher - when we’re not owned by one entity let alone state, the underlying racist tones of “oil money” thats thrown about, and still is by Man U fans that mustn’t understand what INEOS do. I for one can’t wait! I've noticed Jordan has been very aggressive with his opinion of City being guilty. The way he voices his opinion with a sniggering laugh to those that dare have a different opinion to him is really fucking annoying. He does sometimes make some very good points about various subjects but the way he comes across is an absolute wanker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Mase said: City aren’t state owned. We’re owned by CFG - The group is owned by three organisations, of which 81% is majority-owned by Abu Dhabi United Group, 18% by the American firm Silver Lake, and 1% by Chinese firms China Media Capital and CITIC Capital. Hope that helps you sleep better tonight mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mase Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: Yep, and NUFC are owner 80% by PIF, not the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Pull the other one man; if there’s any group of supporters who knows what a load of bollocks the ‘Abu Dhabi Group’ being separate from the city state of Abu Dhabi is, it is us. The govt manages Abu Dhabi group. okay mate, if you say so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mase Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 5 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: I thought the High Court had already rejected an appeal from the Commercial Court a couple of years ago? We only got charge February last year, so not sure how they rejected anything a couple of years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Just now, Mase said: okay mate, if you say so It’s not ‘if I say so’. It’s a fact. Man City are state-owned and funded by oil wealth. NUFC are state-owned. Separation is a load of bollocks, particularly when you’re dealing with dictatorships. Tell yourself whatever fairy tales you need so that those nasty Man Utd fans having a pop don’t get you down. But Man City’s success is entirely down to the oil wealth of a tiny dictatorship, which has in all likelihood spent the last decade operating outside the rules that others have had to follow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Mase said: We only got charge February last year, so not sure how they rejected anything a couple of years ago. 2018 is when the investigations started. Keep up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now