Jump to content

Football pet hates


Guest JonnyRogers

Recommended Posts

The way the BBC keep putting the women's football headlines front and centre on the website now. Give it up man, nobody's in the least bit interested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aww come on now, how could you not be interested in this phenom?

 

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/77767000/jpg/_77767681_beth_mead2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Sometimes I think I don't care about football any more, then I think of women's football and remember what disinterested really feels like.
Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

The only time I find it annoying is when there's a headline like "Livepool overcome City in thriller" or whatever, and I think I've missed an important match. Then I click on it and it's women's.

 

In general I think women's football is decent though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

The only time I find it annoying is when there's a headline like "Livepool overcome City in thriller" or whatever, and I think I've missed an important match. Then I click on it and it's women's.

 

In general I think women's football is decent though.

 

Come on man it's objectively terrible. Certainly don't have a problem with it but I can never sit through a game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly don't mind it, the top players are a technically better than quite a lot of male players up to a certain level. It's obviously slower, but it's better than (for example) League One where they just hoof it.

 

That said I've only really watched internationals and maybe a couple of super league games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

I think that the thing that people seems to missing is that it's not in any way a question of gender, it's entirely a question of quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foul throws, I know I must have raised this issue a dozen times. How are they called regularly in pub football yet premier league players get away with them all the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the thing that people seems to missing is that it's not in any way a question of gender, it's entirely a question of quality.

 

You just need to produce better women.  :coolsmiley:

Link to post
Share on other sites

geordiesteve710

I honestly don't mind it, the top players are a technically better than quite a lot of male players up to a certain level. It's obviously slower, but it's better than (for example) League One where they just hoof it.

 

That said I've only really watched internationals and maybe a couple of super league games.

 

you can't argue that the goalkeepers aren't unreasonably shit though. It's like they haven't got round to coaching that part of the game yet but they'll do it in a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the thing that people seems to missing is that it's not in any way a question of gender, it's entirely a question of quality.

 

You just need to produce better women.  :coolsmiley:

 

What, like your keeper taking pictures of her gaping arsehole? :lol:

 

:okay:

 

:megusta:

Link to post
Share on other sites

mrmojorisin75

Foul throws, I know I must have raised this issue a dozen times. How are they called regularly in pub football yet premier league players get away with them all the time?

 

because they're absolutely pointless probably

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: man, we have been so shit at throw-ins for decades. I am in the perfect thread for this. If we get one it'll be to a guy who isn't expecting it, and it'll bobble off his shin to the opposition, who will attack. If they get one, it'll be to someone totally unmarked who will fire in a cross or attack directly. and we're undone. Every fucking time. I got sick of shouting at them in the end and found it easier to just bury my head in my hands. Twerps. Kinda wish somebody gave a shit tbh.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, OK. Rode off on my hobby-horse there, sorry. If I have an opinion on foul throws, which I doubt, it is that players should learn how to take throws-in properly. Yes, I am sticking to "throws-in". I am likely to be adamant on this, but I should really get some kip before I start being a thorough arse. I presume it is some sensible hour where you are...

 

:( I think the word "sorry" will feature strongly in my Saturday. It can't be 10 to 7, surely? FFS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "can't be offside from a throw in" rule is not exploited anywhere near enough. Thinking of Shearer vs Everton - there's no reason that shouldn't happen more often than it does at the moment (i.e. never)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. The forwards should take off running and the thrower should just Delap it to them.

 

Loved that Dean Saunders one where he bounced it off the keeper's arse and scored as well. Quick thinking for once.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Danny Mills re the Shawcross decision:

 

"Nobody appealed for the penalty. If you give that one you are going to give five or six penalties a game. Every single player in the box has their hands on somebody."

 

Well then fucking give five or six penalties a game. And then they might stop the deliberate, cynical fouling. Someone always pipes up when these are given with the same bullshit excuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Headlines like this

 

http://i.imgur.com/8yiLClj.png

 

Palace also had ten men but theres no mention of that and the headline makes it look like Chelsea were up against it with a man less

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...