Guest alex Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 A lot of Shepherd's biggest defenders are also Bellamy's. Spot the irony. Spot the absurd generalisation. If it doesn't apply to you, why reply? If it does, did it strike a nerve? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 HTL in gay jibes overdrive Must have seen at least half a dozen in the last 2 days! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 HTL is gay jibes overdrive Must have seen at least half a dozen in the last 2 days! Sending out subliminal messages tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 A lot of Shepherd's biggest defenders are also Bellamy's. Spot the irony. Spot the absurd generalisation. If it doesn't apply to you, why reply? If it does, did it strike a nerve? I didn't reply, I was commenting on the ridiculous nature of your posts. A trait you clearly seem to be finding hard to shake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 A lot of Shepherd's biggest defenders are also Bellamy's. Spot the irony. Spot the absurd generalisation. If it doesn't apply to you, why reply? If it does, did it strike a nerve? I didn't reply, I was commenting on the ridiculous nature of your posts. A trait you clearly seem to be finding hard to shake. You did reply tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 A lot of Shepherd's biggest defenders are also Bellamy's. Spot the irony. Spot the absurd generalisation. If it doesn't apply to you, why reply? If it does, did it strike a nerve? I didn't reply, I was commenting on the ridiculous nature of your posts. A trait you clearly seem to be finding hard to shake. You did reply tbh. Didn't. I quoted you like in an essay or summut. FTW! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Texasmag Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 It appears he has no remorse for what he did. I wonder if he thinks he is bigger than Liverpool, especially when he says he didn't think he owed them a performance. The two british football pundits over here call him Tonya Harding, and say he is a disgrace to the game. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/tm_headline=bellamy--golf-spat-inspired-reds-success%26method=full%26objectid=18664514%26siteid=89520-name_page.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 16 pages in 6 days, this can go further than the Luque thread I reckon! Bellamy seems to have the same way of thinking as HTL and NE5, as long as he does it on the pitch he can do whatever he likes off it. Great attitude! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 A lot of Shepherd's biggest defenders are also Bellamy's. Spot the irony. Spot the absurd generalisation. If it doesn't apply to you, why reply? If it does, did it strike a nerve? I didn't reply, I was commenting on the ridiculous nature of your posts. A trait you clearly seem to be finding hard to shake. You did reply tbh. Didn't. I quoted you like in an essay or summut. FTW! I suggest you look up 'reply' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 16 pages in 6 days, this can go further than the Luque thread I reckon! Bellamy seems to have the same way of thinking as HTL and NE5, as long as he does it on the pitch he can do whatever he likes off it. Great attitude! Nope, terrible attitude. Still, I can't help have a sneaking admiration for his drive and passion, and in this case he might be right. Whatever went on in Portugal has certainly not harmed the squad and maybe as he, Rafa and Gerrard have said, it has indeed helped them. /I doubt any amount of Bellamy's fire could have livened up last nights borefest though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 A lot of Shepherd's biggest defenders are also Bellamy's. Spot the irony. Spot the absurd generalisation. If it doesn't apply to you, why reply? If it does, did it strike a nerve? I didn't reply, I was commenting on the ridiculous nature of your posts. A trait you clearly seem to be finding hard to shake. You did reply tbh. Didn't. I quoted you like in an essay or summut. FTW! I suggest you look up 'reply' Dear boy, I would suggest you do the same. Nowhere in my post did I address you directly. I spoke out to the world, anguished at the absurdity of your generalisation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 So basically if we want to go anywhere we need someone who will beat our players if they refuse to do Karaoke with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 So basically if we want to go anywhere we need someone who will beat our players if they refuse to do Karaoke with them. amazing logic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 So basically if we want to go anywhere we need someone who will beat our players if they refuse to do Karaoke with them. amazing logic similar logic that had we kept bellamy we'd be so much better than now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 I suggest you look up 'reply' Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 I suggest you look up 'reply' Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. A reply is a response to something said or written tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 So basically if we want to go anywhere we need someone who will beat our players if they refuse to do Karaoke with them. amazing logic Absolutely stunning logic if Gejon actually derived that from my post. I have no idea what went down and if it was repeated the outcome may be different, but again, in this case, Bellamy could be right along with Rafa and Gerrrard to point out that the Portugal trip seems to have drawn the team closer if anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 The press response to Bellamy seemingly behaving like a penis brought about a siege mentality which may have drawn the team closer. That's not to say that Bellamy behaving like a penis should be encouraged or condoned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 I suggest you look up 'reply' Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. A reply is a response to something said or written tbh. I think that before you butchered that dictionary definition, it was meant to read "To give an answer or response in speech or writing". In the truest sense, I did neither. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 That's not to say that Bellamy behaving like a penis should be encouraged or condoned. Absolutely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 I suggest you look up 'reply' Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. A reply is a response to something said or written tbh. I think that before you butchered that dictionary definition, it was meant to read "To give an answer or response in speech or writing". In the truest sense, I did neither. I didn't have to look it up. Unlike you it would seem Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 I suggest you look up 'reply' Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. A reply is a response to something said or written tbh. I think that before you butchered that dictionary definition, it was meant to read "To give an answer or response in speech or writing". In the truest sense, I did neither. I didn't have to look it up. Unlike you it would seem I simply cannot comprehend the audacity it must take to wave that tongue at me while you continue to revel face down in a barrel brimful of ignorance. Getting things wrong does not deserve a little dance just because you claim to have managed the feat without the use of a dictionary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 From the Oxford English Dictionary: "Reply: say or write something in response to something said or written." Keep digging though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 I suggest you look up 'reply' Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. A reply is a response to something said or written tbh. I think that before you butchered that dictionary definition, it was meant to read "To give an answer or response in speech or writing". In the truest sense, I did neither. I didn't have to look it up. Unlike you it would seem I simply cannot comprehend the audacity it must take to wave that tongue at me while you continue to revel face down in a barrel brimful of ignorance. Getting things wrong does not deserve a little dance just because you claim to have managed the feat without the use of a dictionary. It is rare to see Alex pulled up on semantics. Very enjoyable. ^-^ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 From the Oxford English Dictionary: "Reply: say or write something in response to something said or written." Keep digging though Tbf I don't think he was replying, but commenting... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now