Lenny Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Dyer didnt play bad against Chelsea. No he was terrible! wipe your face cos your talking s***! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raconteur Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Dyer didnt play bad against Chelsea. No he was terrible! wipe your face cos your talking s***! Perhaps you'd like to expand on why you think Dyer was anything other than terrible on Sunday? Read the match thread (or the Dyer transfer thread), you'll find you're in a very small minority... Yes, he was through on goal once, apart from that he contributed absolutely nothing. The only reason he played the full 90 minutes was because Roeder has made his mind up about N'Zogbia Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Given Solano Bramble Taylor Babayaro Milner Parker Emre Duff Martins Owen On current form that is, normally I'd have Dyer over Milner, but Dyer has been piss poor last few games Plus Milner has been our best player this season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Dyer didnt play bad against Chelsea. No he was terrible! wipe your face cos your talking s***! He was a waste of space v Chelsea. PS: "you're". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Dyer didnt play bad against Chelsea. No he was terrible! wipe your face cos your talking s***! Perhaps you'd like to expand on why you think Dyer was anything other than terrible on Sunday? Read the match thread (or the Dyer transfer thread), you'll find you're in a very small minority... Yes, he was through on goal once, apart from that he contributed absolutely nothing. The only reason he played the full 90 minutes was because Roeder has made his mind up about N'Zogbia Fair enough I may be in the minority but my opinion is that he didnt play bad, im not sayin he played brilliant but to say he was terrible, a waste of space etc I think is just people jumping on the bandwagon and overly criticizing a player because it is that players turn to be slagged off. Thats how it seems to be on here. He hasnt been on form of late but he wasnt terrible against Chelsea, he worked hard and got himself into a few good positions, although I concede he did give the ball away a few times. Re: Nzogbia, i personally think he has been pretty shit for us this season so I dont think he deserved to be in the team against Chelsea, he seems to be non existent at the moment when he plays, at least Dyer gets involved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jonny4Toon Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I don't know how people can defend Dyer! For the natural ability he has undoubtably got, he does not use any of it to benefit newcastle!!! He has 1 great good out of 10 matches! - the rest of the time he's just bullshit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jonny4Toon Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 great match that is!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raconteur Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Fair enough I may be in the minority but my opinion is that he didnt play bad, im not sayin he played brilliant but to say he was terrible, a waste of space etc I think is just people jumping on the bandwagon and overly criticizing a player because it is that players turn to be slagged off. Thats how it seems to be on here. He hasnt been on form of late but he wasnt terrible against Chelsea, he worked hard and got himself into a few good positions, although I concede he did give the ball away a few times. Re: Nzogbia, i personally think he has been pretty shit for us this season so I dont think he deserved to be in the team against Chelsea, he seems to be non existent at the moment when he plays, at least Dyer gets involved. Well, we'll have to agree to disagree, because I thought he was indeed terrible and a waste of space, and I don't care about bandwagons - I call it how I see it. He was woeful, and needed to be substituted. (Then again, so did Sibierski, at least ten minutes before injury forced Roeder's hand) Which leads me to my point re N'Zogbia - yes, he certainly has been underwhelming this season, but when Dyer was as poor as he was on Sunday yet Roeder still thought "Hmmm, I could put N'Zogbia on for Dyer, but no..." - it tells me more about how Roeder views N'Zogbia than how well Dyer played. Maybe you think Roeder made the right call, but I certainly don't Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Luque Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 this season on form per game: Given Solano - Bramble - Taylor - Edgar Milner - Butt - Emre - Dyer Martins - Sib/Ameobi/Carroll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Fair enough I may be in the minority but my opinion is that he didnt play bad, im not sayin he played brilliant but to say he was terrible, a waste of space etc I think is just people jumping on the bandwagon and overly criticizing a player because it is that players turn to be slagged off. Thats how it seems to be on here. He hasnt been on form of late but he wasnt terrible against Chelsea, he worked hard and got himself into a few good positions, although I concede he did give the ball away a few times. Re: Nzogbia, i personally think he has been pretty s*** for us this season so I dont think he deserved to be in the team against Chelsea, he seems to be non existent at the moment when he plays, at least Dyer gets involved. Well, we'll have to agree to disagree, because I thought he was indeed terrible and a waste of space, and I don't care about bandwagons - I call it how I see it. He was woeful, and needed to be substituted. (Then again, so did Sibierski, at least ten minutes before injury forced Roeder's hand) Which leads me to my point re N'Zogbia - yes, he certainly has been underwhelming this season, but when Dyer was as poor as he was on Sunday yet Roeder still thought "Hmmm, I could put N'Zogbia on for Dyer, but no..." - it tells me more about how Roeder views N'Zogbia than how well Dyer played. Maybe you think Roeder made the right call, but I certainly don't Im happy to agree to disagree! However I dont particualarly think N'Zogbia should have come on, as said before the times I have seen him recently he has pretty much been a passenger, and you can't afford to risk putting someone on that may potentially be a liability. This obviously stems from my opinion that Dyer didnt play that bad, and at least worked hard because I'm sure you will think that Dyer was a liability. I think Roeder was actually too afraid to change anything and that his hand was forced to change Sibierski because he was on the floor every 5 minutes with a different knock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Thandi_45 Posted April 25, 2007 Share Posted April 25, 2007 Cech Carlos Woodgate Nesta Cafu Messi Viana Gattuso Ronaldo Martins Van der Fart Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now