NE5 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 not being funny Andy, but thats sort of what I meant. I am aware one or two mods would like shot of me, and I realise some don't, but it only takes one. That goes for quite a lot of people I would imagine. I think the thread I highlighed directly contravenes the quote, and some would agree, whereas some would not [all depending on personalities] You'd have been gone if the mod's wanted it that way. singular or plural ? I would say one at least would like shot of me. I also know that others don't. But the point is valid as regards other people. For instance, I have no idea what the score was with thompers, but I quite liked him. And there are some people who are clearly WUM's and nothing else. I saw where you said that mods and admin can do it in the way they see fit, and that is right, but they have opened this up for us to comment. I just think it could be a difficult thing to apply consistently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Andy never directly replies to me I thinks he's scared tbh Can we use this thread for discussing the rule change and NOT for mundane drivel please? You know, before I just start randomly deleting people who I can't be fucked with? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Ohhh scary Andy is online Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 singular or plural ? I would say one at least would like shot of me. I also know that others don't. But the point is valid as regards other people. For instance, I have no idea what the score was with thompers, but I quite liked him. And there are some people who are clearly WUM's and nothing else. I saw where you said that mods and admin can do it in the way they see fit, and that is right, but they have opened this up for us to comment. I just think it could be a difficult thing to apply consistently. No idea about Thompers, it might have been ban evasion or something like that but they have rules which they stick too, at times they give people more chances than they need to and they do it because they don't want to ban people, I don't know a single one who likes doing it, I would say so if I thought that they did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 singular or plural ? I would say one at least would like shot of me. I also know that others don't. But the point is valid as regards other people. For instance, I have no idea what the score was with thompers, but I quite liked him. And there are some people who are clearly WUM's and nothing else. I saw where you said that mods and admin can do it in the way they see fit, and that is right, but they have opened this up for us to comment. I just think it could be a difficult thing to apply consistently. No idea about Thompers, it might have been ban evasion or something like that but they have rules which they stick too, at times they give people more chances than they need to and they do it because they don't want to ban people, I don't know a single one who likes doing it, I would say so if I thought that they did. It was ban evasion and doing something completely out of order at the same time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now