Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 blind to the truth tbh Hows that then? You honestly saying Viduka isn't good enough for us? errr yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 I doubt you have even seen him play. He is exactly the type of player we need at the moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 I doubt you have even seen him play. He is exactly the type of player we need at the moment. yeah you're right Jon, never seen him play, ever Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest graemeh72 Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 I doubt you have even seen him play. He is exactly the type of player we need at the moment. nod Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 I doubt you have even seen him play. He is exactly the type of player we need at the moment. yeah you're right Jon, never seen him play, ever Open your eyes next time Agree with Jon. He would be mint with Oba. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 what moment is that then? we don't have enough old mercenary wanks for the likes of Fat Sam to mould with his amazing talents? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 so basically, with the attractive proposition that he won't have to move, and provided we call him quickly enough so as to appear sufficiently desperate, we can have a Fat Aussie wank for free (because he doesn't earn a wage either) Correction, a fat Aussie wank who scored 19 goals in 37 games last season (that's more goals than any of our strikers). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 so basically, with the attractive proposition that he won't have to move, and provided we call him quickly enough so as to appear sufficiently desperate, we can have a Fat Aussie wank for free (because he doesn't earn a wage either) Correction, a fat Aussie wank who scored 19 goals in 37 games last season (that's more goals than any of our strikers). Of which he started 19 and managed to get a handful of assists. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 what moment is that then? we don't have enough old mercenary wanks for the likes of Fat Sam to mould with his amazing talents? so basically, with the attractive proposition that he won't have to move, and provided we call him quickly enough so as to appear sufficiently desperate, we can have a Fat Aussie w*** for free (because he doesn't earn a wage either) Correction, a fat Aussie w*** who scored 19 goals in 37 games last season (that's more goals than any of our strikers). Probably got several assists too. His overall play is great. Sure he is not the fastest or youngest but he is an experienced goal scoring striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest graemeh72 Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 what moment is that then? we don't have enough old mercenary wanks for the likes of Fat Sam to mould with his amazing talents? so basically, with the attractive proposition that he won't have to move, and provided we call him quickly enough so as to appear sufficiently desperate, we can have a Fat Aussie w*** for free (because he doesn't earn a wage either) Correction, a fat Aussie w*** who scored 19 goals in 37 games last season (that's more goals than any of our strikers). Probably got several assists too. His overall play is great. Sure he is not the fastest or youngest but he is an experienced goal scoring striker. strong in the air, holds the ball up well, clever footballer knows when to come deep - has exactly what we need to do well next season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him A couple of years ago we didn't need him. Not rocket science is it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no c*** defending him Its called progression. People grow up, get experienced and become better players. Some go off the rails, some never make it. You can't deny his impact at all for Boro last season. And the fact we had Wor Alan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest graemeh72 Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him a couple of years ago we had Alan Shearer to do that job... ..sigh ...the days Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him A couple of years ago we didn't need him. Not rocket science is it? Shearer stayed 1 year too long and retired last season, so by that logic, yes we did Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 I reckon 2 years ago, on a free people would tave taken him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets No its not. One striker going out, one striker coming in, one striker who cannot score, one striker who can. Its not difficult to see why Sibi is brought up now is it? PS: Same Chairman if you are going to be in a pedantic mood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets This is a manager who is much more likely to get the best out of Viduka, I don't see your point? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets This is a manager who is much more likely to get the best out of Viduka, I don't see your point? see, I knew Fat Sam's miracle work would come into it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets This is a manager who is much more likely to get the best out of Viduka, I don't see your point? see, I knew Fat Sam's miracle work would come into it Well its fairly obvious isn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets This is a manager who is much more likely to get the best out of Viduka, I don't see your point? see, I knew Fat Sam's miracle work would come into it Do you rate Southgate above Allardyce as a manager? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets No its not. One striker going out, one striker coming in, one striker who cannot score, one striker who can. Its not difficult to see why Sibi is brought up now is it? PS: Same Chairman if you are going to be in a pedantic mood. 'we have a striker leaving' is not an argument for signing Viduka, it's an argument for signing a striker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 jesus christ, I bet if we went back a couple of years on this forum, there would be no cunt defending him I wouldn't pay a fee for him, no way, but for free its a bargain we should take up asap. Surely you can see he's an upgrade to Sibierski? different manager different chairman bringing up sibierski is a complete irrelevance, apart from if you want to compare effort and commitment in terms of relative pay packets This is a manager who is much more likely to get the best out of Viduka, I don't see your point? see, I knew Fat Sam's miracle work would come into it Do you rate Southgate above Allardyce as a manager? how is that relevant? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now