Shearergol

Yeah pretty much. It's kinda vital that he argues that too tbh

Not great when you're having to argue with the judge at this stage

Nope, that's needed to continue paying for Willock. There is no war chest until that transfer is complete.

Because they haven't been recklessly spending like Barca, apparently.

Adam Lewis body language has changed massively since Jowell first started. Lots of glasses off/on, arms folded/unfolded; he really can't get comfortable.

D6 tab 2 everyone. Keep up.

I'd love to know that amount

Yep

Is my internet shit or is it theirs?

It's a great argument that the club's loss is the loss of investment from a potential new owner. Very hard to dispute that.

See you all in an hour

What's all this?

What's arbitration actually for then? To decide whether KSA is a director or not? If so there's no chance we win that.

Yep

This is all going swimmingly bad, just like we all expected

10:30

Is this becoming a bit of a misconception about Rafa? Towards the end of his last season we looked awesome and very entertaining. Just because he kept things tight against the better teams whilst he had shite players at his disposal doesn't mean he doesn't like to play attacking football.

One of my mates follows City and I've been having this debate with him for ages. It's mental - Kane was available, Man City have unlimited funds, just buy him, win everything. I think they've got it in their heads that they'll have Haaland next season so why bother with Kane.

It's Keith Patterson?

Pep’s obsessed with winning without playing a striker. Doesn’t work. Just buy a fucking goal scoring striker with your unlimited funds you dick. Or don’t, it’s amusing seeing them never win the CL

Where’s our friendly pigeon at? What was today’s news?

You looking for this?

I think it's likely that this will be postponed until after arbitration isn't it? T I M E will tell I guess

As long as we're entertaining though. We'd take some 0-7 losses as long as the neutrals find it fun, right?