Shearergol

Yep

Will it? Guaranteee sterry and longstaff will be in league 1 and the championship in the near future. At best. Just the 2018 version of good and vuckic Still like to see them first hand and make my own mind up. He means they’ll be playing in those leagues for us.

Strong bench. Has to be with rob Elliot sat on it.

Wildcard played

This ^ We’ll spend big on a number 9 in summer though. Someone like Troy deeney.

Still think people are ignoring the fact that our ball retention was the worst it’s been in a long time. Players learn how to pass and we would have had a lot more of the ball. It wasn’t tactical to have so little possession.

Murphy was non-existent.

Liverpool made a nice profit for 2016/7 (net spend was close to 0 but made profits of almost 40m), will make a big profit for 17/18 (net spend again 0, but huge profits because of their CL run). Those profits will result in a breaking even when the loss in 18/19 is factored in (net spend so far is 150m), but their revenues have grown so much that it doesn't really matter. They're on such a stable footing financially compared to 5 years ago. If they weren't intent on winning things, they could easily coast to a Top 4 place this year and make huge profits once again. You know I was being sarcastic right?

Spurs must have a rich owner who puts his own cash in for no return. That’s the only way clubs can afford anything.

I'm not sure if it's the tactics or rather just not enough players who are either technically or physically up to it. When you are playing a deep formation with counter-attacking intention, it takes a lot of precision and technique in tight spaces. Then you have players like Ritchie who don't have the pace to counter either. I don’t think it was a tactical decision for our ball retention to be absolute turd. We could have had loads more of the ball if our players could pass.

It ends when we all walk away, or Ashley does. It’ll be us though, and more idiots will take our place.

Why have we got worse?

No, because they are one off games with no long term impact, so they can afford to just 'give it a go'. That’s a fair point, but I do watch a lot of games where lower league clubs actually look a lot better in an attacking sense than we ever do. Just wonder why.

You've spouted some shite about Ki in this thread. Sure you're the one that asked if he had even won the ball back at all in like the 60th minute when he won it back fantastically only about 3 or 4 minutes into the game. Talking shit. He also gave the ball away at least 3 times in the first 35 minutes on the rare occasions we had the ball. Can't judge him after one game, but today he was unquestionably poor. Hope he improves. I don't really care if you think that. Bore off will you nobhead Harsh on HawK

Not really. Seen far worse. We defended really well. Still we let in 2. Rather we have a go and lose, than not trying at all. This game was lost before it started. Missing Shelvey and leaving Lascelles obviously didn't help, but this was shocking. Not much fun watching us park the bus, but we'd have got mullered if we went toe to toe with them. Always wonder how cup upsets even happen. Do league two teams just sit back and hope for a 0-0 against premiership teams?

He’d probably be much better in an attacking team. But if we were an attacking team Mitrovic would still be here.

What did you think to Ki’s performance?

Yedlin’s played really well too. Should maybe have gone back to the original system ?

Itgh

Change to attack and score. The system has changed.

Bingo. It’s a one chance system. Hate it.

There is part of me that thinks if you have a go from an attacking sense you’re less likely to lose. But i’ve never won the champions league so what do I know.

It hasn’t worked though, unless we stay up on GD I’m convinced Perez is a massive jinx by the way, always seem to concede when he comes on.

Ace

We always seem to lose when Perez comes off the bench.