Howaythelads

Just trying to fit in better and become a proper part of the forum, mate. Like booboo. smeeagain.gif :spam1:

Just trying to fit in better and become a proper part of the forum, mate. Like booboo.

OMG

Actually, I'd say the fact Chelsea have gone backwards this season despite massive financial clout would have spurred a pretty decent discussion.

briefly, I thought you were intelligent Johan, but now I think that having confirmed you are totally unable to accept the fact that the current board have improved the club massively during its time in charge, to be the view of what I call a skyboy. I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt. Shame. Well, what is good for me is that what one guy on an internet forum thinks defines intelligence dont really mean much:) I admit to not knowing much about prior to 92, I was 11 at the time. Also being a bully when people dont agree with you dont really make me think of you as that much smarter either.. I dont think I have ever said that newcastle since 92 has not moved forward, big time. I dont think anyone thinks that it hasnt. That doesnt mean that there might not be a better solution in the present however. All things must come to and end, change is inevitable and things like that. Also I dont think I have ever seen you answer what I see as my main question, is it fair in any way to see it as 2 boards? One from 92 - 98 led by Sir John Hall and one from 98 - now led by Freddy. If you have answered this somewhere I am sorry, otherwise please do. :roll: Those who have supported the club for a long time know what it is like when the club is run by a shit Board and so would prefer to not take the gamble on change. It can't be assumed a new Board will be better or more ambitious, a new Board could just as easily be worse. Some have the mistaken belief based on ignorance that the current Board is shit, assuming any change would be for the better. BTW I note the initial personal type post in your exchanges in this thread came from you. That really shows you to be the bully but don't let the facts get in the way, eh. Well, I hear what you are saying and I have appologiced for my suggestion that NE5 was in fact hired by the club spread its word here. I dont really think there has been much verbal attacks or whatever you would say coming from me. I have tried to write in what I feel has been an ok way about other posters. Also I said that I accepted the first "revenge" from NE5 if you will. To call me unintelligent though was uncalled for! As I have said, changing board is a gamble and it is one I am willing to take. Sure it can go either way, and you might have different ideas of how it will go. I dont however accept that the fact the the board newcastle had prior to 92 and how bad it was (which I really have no clue about to be honest) totally frees this one from responsability. ( Sorry for any bad language, I am to tired to check it all out in a dictionary right now) I don't know which way a change of Board will go, I don't have a clue, unlike others who can predict the future and know it can only be better. Nobody has ever said that the fact Boards pre-1992 were crap absolves the current Board from any responsibility. Please post a link to where anybody has said that. Thanks in advance. Well, it has not been said by straight out by either you or NE5 but that is the interpretation that I have made of his comments. If you really want I can try and find a post that I feel represents this but that will have to wait until tomorrow. Right now I will go and get free beer and food all night from the company I work for! Well I think your interpretation needs a bit of work, mate. I doubt such a post exists, I've made my point so don't bother looking unless you feel you have to.

WOOP! WOOP! TOUGH GUY ALERT!!! bluelaugh.gif

Zog. Duff could go to LB.

briefly, I thought you were intelligent Johan, but now I think that having confirmed you are totally unable to accept the fact that the current board have improved the club massively during its time in charge, to be the view of what I call a skyboy. I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt. Shame. Well, what is good for me is that what one guy on an internet forum thinks defines intelligence dont really mean much:) I admit to not knowing much about prior to 92, I was 11 at the time. Also being a bully when people dont agree with you dont really make me think of you as that much smarter either.. I dont think I have ever said that newcastle since 92 has not moved forward, big time. I dont think anyone thinks that it hasnt. That doesnt mean that there might not be a better solution in the present however. All things must come to and end, change is inevitable and things like that. Also I dont think I have ever seen you answer what I see as my main question, is it fair in any way to see it as 2 boards? One from 92 - 98 led by Sir John Hall and one from 98 - now led by Freddy. If you have answered this somewhere I am sorry, otherwise please do. :roll: Those who have supported the club for a long time know what it is like when the club is run by a shit Board and so would prefer to not take the gamble on change. It can't be assumed a new Board will be better or more ambitious, a new Board could just as easily be worse. Some have the mistaken belief based on ignorance that the current Board is shit, assuming any change would be for the better. BTW I note the initial personal type post in your exchanges in this thread came from you. That really shows you to be the bully but don't let the facts get in the way, eh. Well, I hear what you are saying and I have appologiced for my suggestion that NE5 was in fact hired by the club spread its word here. I dont really think there has been much verbal attacks or whatever you would say coming from me. I have tried to write in what I feel has been an ok way about other posters. Also I said that I accepted the first "revenge" from NE5 if you will. To call me unintelligent though was uncalled for! As I have said, changing board is a gamble and it is one I am willing to take. Sure it can go either way, and you might have different ideas of how it will go. I dont however accept that the fact the the board newcastle had prior to 92 and how bad it was (which I really have no clue about to be honest) totally frees this one from responsability. ( Sorry for any bad language, I am to tired to check it all out in a dictionary right now) I don't know which way a change of Board will go, I don't have a clue, unlike others who can predict the future and know it can only be better. Nobody has ever said that the fact Boards pre-1992 were crap absolves the current Board from any responsibility. Please post a link to where anybody has said that. Thanks in advance.

I think you're the one obsessed with blokes, tbh. Baseless, pointless and immature statement. Nothing new from you then Like this one then.... http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,33507.msg642042.html#msg642042 You're the one talking about Mick in a topic that he had neither posted in nor had anything to do with. I know you've got some agenda against him but do you really need to bring it into every thread? I have nowt against Mick, so what is this agenda you mention? It seems you've missed those posts with him babbling on about me, like. Why's that, or do you just want an excuse to make a post to me? I'm already taken if you're after something, married to a woman like. Sorry. gay.gif Fuck's sake man, not even that funny any more. I've never once said Mick et al are innocent of anything. Nor am I the only person to have said something about you bringing his name into this thread for no reason other than to continue your childish argument. And congratulations on having a wife, I'm impressed. Couldn't really care less though, but thanks for sharing that with us. I don't take offence to your gay accusations by the way, I just think you constantly making homosexuality out to be a bad thing to be a little pathetic really. I'm very much straight and have always have been so don't worry, besides even if I were gay I don't think you'd be my type You've convinced me.

I think you're the one obsessed with blokes, tbh. Baseless, pointless and immature statement. Nothing new from you then Like this one then.... http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,33507.msg642042.html#msg642042 You're the one talking about Mick in a topic that he had neither posted in nor had anything to do with. I know you've got some agenda against him but do you really need to bring it into every thread? I have nowt against Mick, so what is this agenda you mention? It seems you've missed those posts with him babbling on about me, like. Why's that, or do you just want an excuse to make a post to me? I'm already taken if you're after something, married to a woman like. Sorry. gay.gif Poor bitch I imagine shes getting her leg over from the bloke next door, because you're too busy typing furiously to defend the chairman. I bet you don't even know she's left the house, or hear the loud thudding of the bed headboard... Closest you get is watching other people in their cars, boy. While frantically pulling at your little nob no doubt.

You got a problem there, Jon? Get yersel' oot for a beer, man. Looks like you need it. Dont think I could face one at the moment! Eh? Why not? Still hung over from a big session last night, or something? Yep, my insides hurt! Bloody hell! That doesn't sound good.

Fred's a bastard, that's for sure.

I think you're the one obsessed with blokes, tbh. Baseless, pointless and immature statement. Nothing new from you then Like this one then.... http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,33507.msg642042.html#msg642042 You're the one talking about Mick in a topic that he had neither posted in nor had anything to do with. I know you've got some agenda against him but do you really need to bring it into every thread? I have nowt against Mick, so what is this agenda you mention? It seems you've missed those posts with him babbling on about me, like. Why's that, or do you just want an excuse to make a post to me? I'm already taken if you're after something, married to a woman like. Sorry. gay.gif

You got a problem there, Jon? Get yersel' oot for a beer, man. Looks like you need it. Dont think I could face one at the moment! Eh? Why not? Still hung over from a big session last night, or something?

briefly, I thought you were intelligent Johan, but now I think that having confirmed you are totally unable to accept the fact that the current board have improved the club massively during its time in charge, to be the view of what I call a skyboy. I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt. Shame. Well, what is good for me is that what one guy on an internet forum thinks defines intelligence dont really mean much:) I admit to not knowing much about prior to 92, I was 11 at the time. Also being a bully when people dont agree with you dont really make me think of you as that much smarter either.. I dont think I have ever said that newcastle since 92 has not moved forward, big time. I dont think anyone thinks that it hasnt. That doesnt mean that there might not be a better solution in the present however. All things must come to and end, change is inevitable and things like that. Also I dont think I have ever seen you answer what I see as my main question, is it fair in any way to see it as 2 boards? One from 92 - 98 led by Sir John Hall and one from 98 - now led by Freddy. If you have answered this somewhere I am sorry, otherwise please do. :roll: Those who have supported the club for a long time know what it is like when the club is run by a shit Board and so would prefer to not take the gamble on change. It can't be assumed a new Board will be better or more ambitious, a new Board could just as easily be worse. Some have the mistaken belief based on ignorance that the current Board is shit, assuming any change would be for the better. BTW I note the initial personal type post in your exchanges in this thread came from you. That really shows you to be the bully but don't let the facts get in the way, eh.

I think you're the one obsessed with blokes, tbh. Baseless, pointless and immature statement. Nothing new from you then Like this one then.... http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,33507.msg642042.html#msg642042

You got a problem there, Jon? Get yersel' oot for a beer, man. Looks like you need it.

I'm not really sure if the Woodgate purchase was entirely for the reason you mentioned - seemed a lot more like 'taking advantage of Leeds' precarious financial position' - in fact each one of those signings were us taking advantage of the financial position of the players' respective clubs. We thought there were bargains to be had with re-sell value; that seems to have been the defining reason to purchase those players - and the fact that we no longer have any of them would bear that out. And we've never replaced Woodgate, of course. a quite staggering load of rubbish. So Woodgate and Bowyer weren't at a club that was financially suspect at the time? You don't think NUFC were taking advantage of that situation? And Ambrose wasn't signed from a club that was financially suspect at the time? NUFC approached Deloitte and Touche, who were handling Ipswich's accounts, with bids for both Ambrose and Darren Bent. But Ipswich are understood to be furious at Newcastle's attempts to sign the players on the cheap and take advantage of their financial crisis. Newcastle chairman Freddy Shepherd was, however, in defiant mood. He said: "I made a bid to the administrators, who thought we were being cheeky. "Far from being cheeky, I would have thought that any interest for the sort of money we are talking about would be interesting to a club in Ipswich's position." Have we replaced Woodgate? You know, did we replace him? Woodgate? Well, we replaced him with 14 million quid and the promise that we'd be "pleasantly surprised" by whomever was lined up to replace him. I'm amazed you can't find _anything_ there that's within the realms of possibility but hell no, it's only everyone else that only has an agenda. Fan-f***ing-tastic. The bit that is a total load of crap is the suggestion players were signed based on the idea there may be a profit made by selling them on. Signing players thought to be good under circumstances that allowed the club to get them at a good price is actually great business, you should be praising the Board for this but instead you spin even that to make out the Board is crap. :roll: To save you denying you said this, here is what you said.... "We thought there were bargains to be had with re-sell value; that seems to have been the defining reason to purchase those players - and the fact that we no longer have any of them would bear that out." I was going to cut out the bit after the dash, as it's not relevant, but you would use that omission to deflect from the issue in your usual style so I'll answer it. The reason those players aren't here now is nothing to do with cashing in to make a profit. They were signed because it was thought they would improve the team, some of them didn't so they moved on, or moved on for other reasons, in the case of Woodgate his injury situation. Your suggestion those players were sold was for any other reason is one of the most incredible things I've read on this forum and is a real pointer to how blinkered you are by hatred of the Board.

Back on topic. Mourinho has taken Chelsea backwards this season. FACT. Therefore, he must be shit.

I think you're the one obsessed with blokes, tbh.

You really shouldn't slag off mick like that, Dave.

Mick will confirm Mourinho is actually shit because he's taken Chelsea backwards this season. Shite Board as well. The league table doesn't lie....from 8 points clear leaders the last 2 seasons to 6 points off top spot now, shite or what. No ambition. :winking:

Jesus, give it a rest. Come back to me when Emre and Butt have done the business away from home against a proper team next Wednesday, eh? Truth hurts, don't it. Come back to me when Emre and Butt have done the business away from home against a proper team next Wednesday, eh? Come back to me when Parker does the business against any team, eh? He already has... Not sure if you noticed or not but at least he's contributed goals unlike your hero, Nicky Butt. WOOP! WOOP! BORING ALERT!!! bluelaugh.gif

Great observation there, like. Can't argue. Well done, old man. (smiles, shakes head, whispers...) too kind, too kind............................ Don't mention it, sir. Praise where it's due and all that.....