madras

can't believe no-ones posted "missionary","doggy" or "spoons" yet

just for the record,i don't think he will fuck up

aye,scottishfootball is so much better........................ferguson and wenger are now english as far as football goes.

i'm bookmarking this so in a couple of years i can return with "right fuck up" if it doesn't work out

sure this needs a new thread ? "won't somebody think of the bandwidth"

Did anyone make a big deal about us missing out? no,but i'd like him here going on the few times i've seen him(espech the game up here)

very heterosexually behaving tweenies i might add !

how long did it take man utd to be happy with ferguson,i know some arsenal fans who wax lyrical about what they thought when wenger was appointed (not happy at the time),mourinho hasn't been such a star this year and benitez has never challenged for the LFC holy grail(the title). with allardyce we'll be organised,the interest will be if his style of football changes with the supposed better quality he can get his hands on here.

so that's it then is it,we are going to call him "big sam"........sounds a tad gay to me. can we have a forum rule that unless the poster is gay it should be "allardyce" or "our manager" or "sam"

uefa.

I aint going back to check It would be nice if you could prove it, since you are running an accusation? Some people (not suggesting you) are going beyond jokes everytime someone mentions an obscure player by suggesting that the player must be drawn from FM. But if this is trully the case then the names of Saivet, Millar, Bisewar, Van Borren, Ekoko etc the "true" FM wonderkids would have been mentioned more frequently. It makes me laugh loudly when the supposedly "obscure" players are not even good or great in FM. BTW, Karate Kuyt I agree with what you have been saying in this thread. i truly can't be arsed to go and check,maybe i will,even back then i'm pretty sure i was asking how people got this info,many will have access but i doubt very many use it.

I aint going back to check

in a way the point of the thread Right. So Shevchenko might have been absolute garbage for Milan then, because no-one is allowed to have an opinion unless... what? They have a season ticket at the San Siro? no,because we all could see milan often enough,we can see brca,real,ajax,psv, often enough.....outside of that type of thing we are struggling. How? Is Italian football on more often than Spanish football? I don't think so, especially bearing in mind that when Luque was there, Depor were a very regular Champions League side. I believe he scored against Milan in that tournament actually. yes and you are using one player as an example,i'm on about as soon as some tabloid mentions us with some nobody many on here know all about him,onweyu is a good example,3 world cup games in which they wouldn't really have taken any notice of him,never pointed him out as someone we should get,yet as soon as he is linked we have many experts on the jupiler league and standard liege.

in a way the point of the thread Right. So Shevchenko might have been absolute garbage for Milan then, because no-one is allowed to have an opinion unless... what? They have a season ticket at the San Siro? no,because we all could see milan often enough,we can see brca,real,ajax,psv, often enough.....outside of that type of thing we are struggling.

in a way the point of the thread

hang on,wheres the "owen used to persuade rooney to sign for newcastle " headline

change "forum" for "football club"

even with the technical ability to watch every game how long would it take to watch,say,the top 6 in each league,then often enough to make an informed opinion on a player....................not to mention how much you can gauge on tele. Its impossible to be able to rate every player in every league,even if its just players from the top 4 clubs in lets say 6 leagues.. But you can spot big talents pretty easily though thats the point of the thread,those that wank on about players who they could only have seen brief highlights of a at best 2 live games.

even with the technical ability to watch every game how long would it take to watch,say,the top 6 in each league,then often enough to make an informed opinion on a player....................not to mention how much you can gauge on tele.

f****** exactly. But hey, I suppose if you've been here three days you'll have seen loads of it. I am always here. I live in the rafters. Seeing as you claim there's loads of this going on, I'm sure you won't have any trouble pointing out a few examples..? hard to name names,look for those who were fetisching over nihat a while back or those who were telling us how anelka was doing in turkey

not surprised, he's a defender mark hughes was the must have on my last footy manager game,took ages to load on a comodore 64 aswell

nick griffin

i wasn't wanting it just to be transfers,any footy news that is 100% true as opposed to tosh

one for the mods.........would it be possible to section off a bit of the forum for fact and a bit for fiction,rumour,conjecture etc ie "player X IS going to team Y and here is the source" and the source would have to be a direct quote not supposition or "a club insider said" or would that be too lonely a place ?

Anybody who doesn't think we're a bigger club than them, is a total w***, simple as that really. You're doing it again, Stevie. That whole "we're a big club nonesense". PLEase god don't base it on stadium size again. I base it on many, many things. Infinitely bigger fanbase, infinitely better resources over a 15 year period, a recent history of competing seriously for Champions League places, a larger wage pool to attract new players, a far bigger turnover over a long period, far better facilities, only an idiot could doubt we're a bigger club. Everton ramshackle of a ground, top 5 once in 15 years, Tottenham, have their best side since 1991 and are still no where near the Champions League, it's a ridiculous argument. Nicely chosen criteria, Stevie. This whole "we're a bigger club than X" thing is so f****** small time. Surely the best criteria to be a big club is that big clubs WIN THINGS. That's the one criteria you mysteriously left out, though. Funny that. I wonder how the big 4 feel as they're mopping up the trophies year after year, and the second tranche of clubs are involved in petty point scoring and bickering about stuff that really does not matter. They'll be pissing themselves laughing, one imagines .... "ooh, they've seriously competed for CL places 10 years ago, how nice" whilst they go back to polishing their trophies. Stevie the deluded loser will never understand this. FFS he lists "recent history of competing for champions league places" over actual trophies won mackems.gif then you are saying mk dons,oxford and luton are bigger than NUFC,safc. everyones idea of what constitutes a big club is different.