Dave

Just another question. Do you think Charlton draws more viewers than Newcastle?

And the need for that was? It'd be nice if they showed some logic and fairness in their decision-making.

Charlton next.

Thing is... i didn't watch it - and i didn't listen to it until the penalty shootout, so my immediate impression was that they did. Considering the guy was saying "Watford vs Newcastle" at teh same time, i kinda jumped to that conclusion. Like i say - sorry. :roll: Pedant. Damn right!

It's laughable that the only game that was shown live tonight is the first on the highlights show.

Sorry Yorkie, I thought you were moaning that they'd showed one of tonight's goals in the intro. They didn't.

You've always been able to post Getty images. It has the watermark.

They didn't. What was that free-kick that went in then? :? No idea. Watford didn't score a direct free-kick tonight. Well i'm sorry. Christ. :roll: You complained about something that didn't happen!

They didn't. What was that free-kick that went in then? :? No idea. Watford didn't score a direct free-kick tonight.

They didn't.

You're getting boring.

Whilst I obviously want us to win every game, fuck the Coca-Cola cup, we could do with three cunting points at some point.

Happy for Parker & Harper. Impressed with the Watford-based commentary. Ludicrous decision-making by Roeder, again. We scraped through in an ultimately meaningless game if we don't stay in the Premiership. Glad we've finally won a penalty shoot-out.

We're 1-1 and desperate for a goal. Roeder takes a striker off for a midfielder...

Surprised Owen isn't higher. I think some have forgotten how good he actually is.

no way will man utd be so dumb to fork out 16 million for scott parker. 10 million tops and even thats pushing it. How much was Carrick worth?

What's your favourite brand of porridge, Emre?

I call straw man.

You just wanted Dyer to get brayed, NM.

What?

One goal scorer, Owen. One absolute pile of donkey shite, Ameobi. A journeyman pro, Sibierski. A very very quick forward with no touch, might come good, Martins. A player who MAY be good in 2 or so years, Rossi. An utter pile of uninterested crap, Luque. That's what we've got. We also have a manager who has no idea of getting goals from the players we're stuck with, which is possibly the biggest problem.

Also, the wages to turnover ratio has plenty of factors, not just how many people we are having to pay. Giving Bernard any money for example looks like being a complete waste. Couldn't that be foreseen? The reaction on here was disbelief that we'd be paying a guy who couldn't impress Championship teams enough on trial. Shepherd also sanctioned Dyer more money despite his ludicrous injury record not long ago.

If some players go out we'd be reducing the wage bill anyway, to compensate. Bramble, Milner, Rossi, Bernard will all possibly be off the wage bill. I don't know how much those players are on, but i'd be disappointed if we couldn't improve on them for very little if we had some semblance of strategy - even if it's older, less flash players for a short term basis only, ie. to keep us up.

This guy's only made four posts Sarnie, so it's proof you won't know without asking.

Brian McBridge?