Wullie

Hamann with a touch of Scouse there.

How shit is that Odonkor? I'll enjoy these twats getting knocked out.

Come on!

God I can't stand Croatia.

Howay you stupid Germans.

I see you've mellowed out a bit in your absence.

His real chance to impress will come in the next game when the stakes are massive and conditions will almost certainly be a lot better.

Absurd spelling. Twice as well.

Was €13m an absurb valuation? Overpriced, possibly. Absurb though?

Rozehnal made a couple of terrible ricks today.

Eh? What gamble? They just didnt want to sell him before the euros as they knew that what ever happened they'd get more after it. Or are you whoooosing They said he could go for a price we weren't prepared to pay at the time. They wanted to wait until after the Euros to see if they could get that price, which they probably will now - probably more and very possibly not off us, whether we're prepared to raise it or not.

We've taken a gamble and it might well not pay off now. Nuts.

Fuck.

The Apprentice my arse, there's a bloody game on!

They made a mess of that, should have scored.

Emre's obviously told the other Turkish lads to do us a favour.

As others have said that is wrong, but the situation almost never arises. How is it wrong? Say there is 2 strikers and the opposition goalkeeper no defenders are involved. The goalie comes out and the player slides it to the other team mate. If player B is behind player A and the pass is "backwards" then he is onside right? Yes but if B is in front of A (would have to be a shit pass) and the ball goes backwards, B goes back and gets it, then it's offside. Hence it being a hypothetical situation that's very unlikely to happen.

Wow. Massive gamble right there. Probably done that to try and stop their Portuguese lads hightailing it to Inter Milan.

Shut the fuck up Mark Bright. Keep the ball away from him.

For the goal? It was Nihat.

Almost? Yes, as in it's a rarity to see a pass backwards for player who is offside. Simply because of the way the game flows. But when it happens it is correct. No, that's a theoretical impossibility.. Edit: well, no it's not I guess, but only when the player was offside and has to run backwards to pick up the backward pass. Not sure where the law stands on that exactly, but I don't think I've ever seen it happen either.. Is that what you are referring to? That's what I was talking about when I said almost always, in that it's not impossible but very unlikely for the ball to go backwards and yet still be offside.

Almost? Yes.

There's nothing in the rules about the ball going backwards. The goalscorer just has to be behind the ball which almost always means that it going backwards is onside.

The weather might be a Godsend if we really intend to buy Turan. One less chance for him to impress.