Jump to content

Keefaz

Member
  • Posts

    37,448
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Keefaz

  1. Slammin' posters. Also, why is Keith Gillespie a local hero?
  2. wearing old man style sandals Probably just some fucking hippy, then.
  3. True, like. What do you think of this one, Yorkie? http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/1540/ponyhirtnm9.jpg
  4. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside. If there is no foul given what would be wrong with that? Well, the goal last night, for one. The defender didn't leave the pitch under his own volition, he was pushed off the pitch and his team was penalised for it.
  5. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside.
  6. Aye, I was screaming when that ball was played in to the edge of the box.
  7. I've got 1-0 down for this, so I hope it turns back into a snoozefest.
  8. Could do with a Swedish streaker to liven things up a bit, tbh.
  9. Does the rule say anything about intentions? Seems like its a blanket rule. He was onside. Sounds a bit wishy-washy to me.
  10. That was our Championship team, right?
  11. Well, I guess that's the talking point. The rule, I believe, states that if a player leaves the field under his own power (i.e. runs or rolls off the pitch) he's should still be classed as being on the pitch for the purposes of an offside. However, during the goal last night you could say the defender had been manhandled off the pitch, which is surely giving the attacking team an unfair advantage by making it virtually impossible to be offside.
  12. It's not making for much of a spectacle, like.
×
×
  • Create New...