TRon

Do you seriously think Shearer has no affection or feeling whatsoever for the club? The sly digs aimed at KK and now Shearer are bang out of order and seem an increasing thing on here these days which I find pathetic to tell you the truth. I know some Liverpool fans who hold Graeme Souness in higher esteem than some of our own lot hold Shearer in and now even KK. I love how Shearer mustn't really love the club all of a sudden because he's not the manager. But Big Joe, what a man eh. We get accused of being a right set of fickle bastards and when you read comments like yours it isn't hard to see why. Shearer - the club's greatest ever goalscorer who gave the club 10 fantastic years of service saving us time and time again or taking us to the heights time and time again is viewed upon with ever more suspicion and cynicism where now people even question his love of the club. In the meantime, Big Joe eh. What a man, he must really love the club to take this job on.... unlike that bastard Shearer bloke on the telly who calls himself a Geordie. Get some fucking perspective will you and all those casting doubt on the characters of Newcastle United legends. Get some fucking perspective yourself and stop twisting what I said into something else entirely. Why you are quoting something I said three weeks ago I have no idea, but in any case what I said is my opinion. I don't think Shearer would have taken the job because he openly criticised the set up. He turned down the chance to work with Keegan before that. What makes you think anything's changed since then? As for Joe, yes I am happy he wanted the job badly enough to do it and publicly welcome the opportunity. At the moment he's doing more for Newcastle than Shearer, Lawrenson, Hansen or any other MOTD tv pundit. If and when Shearer answers the call of his club, his city, then he'll get the support which Joe will get now. Till then I'm not interested to be honest. you have to look at the bigger picture. Some people insist on wanting a club run in a certain way, so they won't take it. Why should Shearer take the job - or Keegan stay in the job - if they feel that the setup is going to hinder them ? Full marks to Kinnear for taking it on - no quibble there, in fact he's always been a tough little bugger with a good personality and so I have a feeling he could do rather better than some people think while he is here - but don't condemn Keegan and Shearer. Shearer may not ever want to be a manager, especially now he's got his foot into a cosy little number with the BBC. If thats the case then its his decision but he doesn't deserve your scorn for it ? It wouldn't be mine, but thats life. Because he's always made out it was his dream job yet kept turning it down. He turned down Freddie..he turned down Keegan. Obviously he's turned down smaller clubs along the road as well like Southampton. The only job he hasn't turned down is MOTD tv pundit. Obviously easy money because he's useless at that as well. yes, that is what you clipped.....but plenty of other NUFC players [and icons] haven't been managers ? Why scorn him for it ? If he doesn't want to be a manager, and having turned down a ready made established club ie Blackburn it looks possible, then why not just remember him as an icon who now holds the club goalscoring record ? If he doesn't want to be Newcastle manager he should really be more clear about it rather than keeping everybody guessing. If you go back to the original post which was only part quoted you'll see that the reason Shearer was even brought into this thread was because Don Hutchinson said it was the ideal time for him to take up the reigns which is when I said I didn't think he'd want the job. As far as icons go, I don't have a problem with him being a Newcastle icon. It's just I don't particularly share the view he was that great in his time here. There aren't many players I've dreaded losing, the only ones that come to mind are Gazza, Waddle and Beardsley when he went to Liverpool.

Sounds like fantastic news to me. New owners with links to the fans are buying the club, Keegan or Shearer must surely be managers in waiting with plenty of money to spend in the transfer market. If NUSC can pull this off I will definitley hold my hands up in shame that I was sceptical this could ever be achieved.

Do you seriously think Shearer has no affection or feeling whatsoever for the club? The sly digs aimed at KK and now Shearer are bang out of order and seem an increasing thing on here these days which I find pathetic to tell you the truth. I know some Liverpool fans who hold Graeme Souness in higher esteem than some of our own lot hold Shearer in and now even KK. I love how Shearer mustn't really love the club all of a sudden because he's not the manager. But Big Joe, what a man eh. We get accused of being a right set of fickle bastards and when you read comments like yours it isn't hard to see why. Shearer - the club's greatest ever goalscorer who gave the club 10 fantastic years of service saving us time and time again or taking us to the heights time and time again is viewed upon with ever more suspicion and cynicism where now people even question his love of the club. In the meantime, Big Joe eh. What a man, he must really love the club to take this job on.... unlike that bastard Shearer bloke on the telly who calls himself a Geordie. Get some fucking perspective will you and all those casting doubt on the characters of Newcastle United legends. Get some fucking perspective yourself and stop twisting what I said into something else entirely. Why you are quoting something I said three weeks ago I have no idea, but in any case what I said is my opinion. I don't think Shearer would have taken the job because he openly criticised the set up. He turned down the chance to work with Keegan before that. What makes you think anything's changed since then? As for Joe, yes I am happy he wanted the job badly enough to do it and publicly welcome the opportunity. At the moment he's doing more for Newcastle than Shearer, Lawrenson, Hansen or any other MOTD tv pundit. If and when Shearer answers the call of his club, his city, then he'll get the support which Joe will get now. Till then I'm not interested to be honest. you have to look at the bigger picture. Some people insist on wanting a club run in a certain way, so they won't take it. Why should Shearer take the job - or Keegan stay in the job - if they feel that the setup is going to hinder them ? Full marks to Kinnear for taking it on - no quibble there, in fact he's always been a tough little bugger with a good personality and so I have a feeling he could do rather better than some people think while he is here - but don't condemn Keegan and Shearer. Shearer may not ever want to be a manager, especially now he's got his foot into a cosy little number with the BBC. If thats the case then its his decision but he doesn't deserve your scorn for it ? It wouldn't be mine, but thats life. Because he's always made out it was his dream job yet kept turning it down. He turned down Freddie..he turned down Keegan. Obviously he's turned down smaller clubs along the road as well like Southampton. The only job he hasn't turned down is MOTD tv pundit. Obviously easy money because he's useless at that as well.

I think he'd be disqualified for never entering the box. Haha !! He'll enter a box at the end of his days showing a similar amount of life I suspect.

FFS just tell the truth. How can we believe anything they say when they contradict each other every week. Why isn't it attractive? The selling price is all the buyer has to pay, they can choose their own manager and basically take the club any direction they want.

http://www.4thegame.com/media/00/04/07/alan_smith.jpg Bent doesn't even come close

What I meant was that theres been so much BS surrounding all of this, theres no good reason why I should implicitly believe or trust Harris because of some notion of him being a reputable man. He works for an investment company - I wouldn't automatically trust such a person if they told me 2+2 =4. He may be telling the truth but even last week Kinnear said that he'd been told Ashley was talking to people. You seem to know a lot about investment and finance. Why not get the NUSC to contact some well-placed people who can put their services forward instead of Seymour Pierce? Or even some trusted analysts who can confirm your suspicions?

I think there was genuine interest but the economic uncertainty at the moment has meant no one is willing to pay premium price for Newcastle, and it looks like Ashley doesn't want to drop his price enough to get the deal done.

Newcastle

Do you seriously think Shearer has no affection or feeling whatsoever for the club? The sly digs aimed at KK and now Shearer are bang out of order and seem an increasing thing on here these days which I find pathetic to tell you the truth. I know some Liverpool fans who hold Graeme Souness in higher esteem than some of our own lot hold Shearer in and now even KK. I love how Shearer mustn't really love the club all of a sudden because he's not the manager. But Big Joe, what a man eh. We get accused of being a right set of fickle bastards and when you read comments like yours it isn't hard to see why. Shearer - the club's greatest ever goalscorer who gave the club 10 fantastic years of service saving us time and time again or taking us to the heights time and time again is viewed upon with ever more suspicion and cynicism where now people even question his love of the club. In the meantime, Big Joe eh. What a man, he must really love the club to take this job on.... unlike that b****** Shearer bloke on the telly who calls himself a Geordie. Get some f***ing perspective will you and all those casting doubt on the characters of Newcastle United legends. Get some f***ing perspective yourself and stop twisting what I said into something else entirely. Why you are quoting something I said three weeks ago I have no idea, but in any case what I said is my opinion. I don't think Shearer would have taken the job because he openly criticised the set up. He turned down the chance to work with Keegan before that. What makes you think anything's changed since then? As for Joe, yes I am happy he wanted the job badly enough to do it and publicly welcome the opportunity. At the moment he's doing more for Newcastle than Shearer, Lawrenson, Hansen or any other MOTD tv pundit. If and when Shearer answers the call of his club, his city, then he'll get the support which Joe will get now. Till then I'm not interested to be honest. So why even bring his name into it if you're not interested and why the suspiciousness regarding his love of the club? Did I bring his name into this thread or was I answering someone else? I really can't remember seeing as it was three weeks ago.

Hard to judge Xisco coming straight into a club in crisis and a team lacking confidence. If he's eased back in once we get a couple of results on board I think it'll give a better picture of what he can do.

Do you seriously think Shearer has no affection or feeling whatsoever for the club? The sly digs aimed at KK and now Shearer are bang out of order and seem an increasing thing on here these days which I find pathetic to tell you the truth. I know some Liverpool fans who hold Graeme Souness in higher esteem than some of our own lot hold Shearer in and now even KK. I love how Shearer mustn't really love the club all of a sudden because he's not the manager. But Big Joe, what a man eh. We get accused of being a right set of fickle bastards and when you read comments like yours it isn't hard to see why. Shearer - the club's greatest ever goalscorer who gave the club 10 fantastic years of service saving us time and time again or taking us to the heights time and time again is viewed upon with ever more suspicion and cynicism where now people even question his love of the club. In the meantime, Big Joe eh. What a man, he must really love the club to take this job on.... unlike that bastard Shearer bloke on the telly who calls himself a Geordie. Get some fucking perspective will you and all those casting doubt on the characters of Newcastle United legends. Get some fucking perspective yourself and stop twisting what I said into something else entirely. Why you are quoting something I said three weeks ago I have no idea, but in any case what I said is my opinion. I don't think Shearer would have taken the job because he openly criticised the set up. He turned down the chance to work with Keegan before that. What makes you think anything's changed since then? As for Joe, yes I am happy he wanted the job badly enough to do it and publicly welcome the opportunity. At the moment he's doing more for Newcastle than Shearer, Lawrenson, Hansen or any other MOTD tv pundit. If and when Shearer answers the call of his club, his city, then he'll get the support which Joe will get now. Till then I'm not interested to be honest.

Or letting players slip through the net, that'll be handy then if he goes to Spurs. Shouldn't Spurs have already signed these players on a nudge and a wink to prove that theory then?

Spot on. He did put the club for sale ASAP & is looking for a quick sale but not a fire sale. He couldn't walk away could he but Mort left, Steve Hayward left & now TJ has left. All his top brass is bailed out, Lambrini will be sit tight until the sale is done. So you approve that he is selling the club and Lambrini is still there to make sure the sale goes through ok? Nice one.

I'm sorry HTT but I'm not having that. You have got to be taking the piss in all honesty. The only person who has actually got on with keeping the club alive is Ashley. He didn't walk away like Keegan and put in a compensation claim while the club burned. He didn't leave Hughton floundering in the storm while trying to sell the club, he tried to get Venables and when that fell through still managed to bring in a manager to work on a short term contract. Kinnear might have caused a few sneers but at least Ashley provided a solution rather than carp from the sidelines which is all the NUSC are capable of so far. All belatedly forced on him by his own inaction to start with. By showing no support or confidence in his manager or to intervene he has effectively allowed this all to happen so pardon me when I don't thank him for appointing an interim manager, a decision that was only brought about because of some players kicking off anyway. If the players were "kicking off" at least most of them now seem happy he has provided a solution rather than whinge and moan like people who think they know better but in fact can't even get simple statement of intent out without looking like a complete bunch of dimwits.

I'm sorry HTT but I'm not having that. You have got to be taking the piss in all honesty. The only person who has actually got on with keeping the club alive is Ashley. He didn't walk away like Keegan and put in a compensation claim while the club burned. He didn't leave Hughton floundering in the storm while trying to sell the club, he tried to get Venables and when that fell through still managed to bring in a manager to work on a short term contract. Kinnear might have caused a few sneers but at least Ashley provided a solution rather than carp from the sidelines which is all the NUSC are capable of so far.

Are you ITK. What did he do? How many times do people have to be told this? Jimenez was the negotiator, and Vetere is the scout. All was made pretty clear by the job titles and their respective CVs where Vetere was a scout for Real Madrid, and Jimenez was a freelance superagent. So the article was bunkum. He didn't fly around the world sourcing talent, none of that shit. He was simply the negotiator. I thinks you need to write some strongly worded letters to the editors then. I think James is probably right though. Vetere's expertise was always described from the start as mainly being scouting, while Jiminez was the dealmaker. I don't know if there was some overlap, but it's probably just lazy journalism.

Just making sure that what you have said there is (even more) clear

I see there are quite a few anti-Ashley posters on other boards starting to admit they are relieved we should be ok during the financial meltdown because Ashley used his own cash to clear the debt leaving in us a fairly healthy position compared to the likes of Man U even. The OP might need to be re-considered in light of this fact

The yanks have been in about 18 months, so they havent backed him with 80 million, infact they havent spent a penny of there own money, they have borrowed money, and are trying to re morgage that loan, meaning each season we have to make 30 million, before we have payed the annual intrest on the loans off. So as I suspected, the Liverpool fans don't like the fact that the club has been put into debt to finance squad strengthening. I wonder how our fans feel about the Liverpool fans attitude, seeing as many have criticised Ashley for not putting us into debt to finance big spending on proven quality players as we did under the previous board? The thing is its main debt die to them buying the club,imagine if some south africans bought Newcastle for 300 million, with a loan, which they secured against Newcastle. And then said oh by the way we have no money. It could still happen although not likely due to the current financial climate.

The yanks have been in about 18 months, so they havent backed him with 80 million, infact they havent spent a penny of there own money, they have borrowed money, and are trying to re morgage that loan, meaning each season we have to make 30 million, before we have payed the annual intrest on the loans off. So as I suspected, the Liverpool fans don't like the fact that the club has been put into debt to finance squad strengthening. I wonder how our fans feel about the Liverpool fans attitude, seeing as many have criticised Ashley for not putting us into debt to finance big spending on proven quality players as we did under the previous board?

The manager has been backed to bring in his own players to the tune of £80m, CL football every year...difficult to grasp what the Yanks have done wrong tbh. Unless it's the fact that there are Arabs wanting to buy in and the fans are hoping they'll come in and spend, spend spend right to the very end?

Likely level of investment is then the only variable. Actually that's not true. Experience in running a similar business will also count. So if Freddy is heading a consortium/ being brought in as chairman? Why would anyone want Freddie as chairman? Would he be bringing his son with him to rubber stamp Luque/Boumsong type deals?

They won't be Cockney Mafia. I think that's as far ahead as the Ashley Out brigade have probably figured it so far.

But surely it makes the club a more viable option - especially in these times. Say the debt was £100m and he hadn't paid it off - the price could then be £200m with the new owneres knowing that they needed another £100m. As it is the price is £300m - no difference. In fact if the debt did still exist a new owner would have the option of servicing the debt instead of paying it off which you could argue would make it more attractive. This is compliacted by Ashley being forced to pay a lot of it off but the point stands - being debt free would only be an advantage if Ashley was staying. Weren't there other interested buyers before Ashley who pulled out after doing due diligence once they realised that £45m would have to be paid off within a month of the takeover?