Jump to content

lovejoy

Member
  • Posts

    9,216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lovejoy

  1. a game he played for you in Europe in his first season where he bagged a hat trick (I could be mis remembering that) he looked brilliant. I’d have him at Nufc, genuinely. There’s a player there i think.
  2. I live in Manchester, and everyone I know who goes to the games thinks Hojlund is shite. I obviously don’t go to any of your games unless it involves nufc, but I think he’s got real potential. whats your take?
  3. Totally agree. we should be as cunty as possible about it and extract every penny from Liverpool that we can, but Isak’s got to go. Fuck him as well. The way he’s gone about this is disgraceful, really.
  4. If we get Sesko, we’ll sell imo. If we don’t, it’s going to get messy.
  5. stinks of trouble in the future doesn’t it?
  6. Sorry if Giggs but our mate Miguel Delaney reckons Man Utd can’t get anywhere near the finances needed for Sesko.
  7. lovejoy

    Joe Willock

    He’s absolutely done here.
  8. I don’t know enough about Jackson, I’ve read an article in the athletic that reckons he’s a pressing machine, but I’ve genuinely no idea. Can’t say I’m arsed about resale value, sick of talking about football as a balance sheet. Watkins will be excellent imo. Not as exciting as Sesko, granted, but he’ll guarantee goals.
  9. It lines up perfectly with his performances at times and his no shows at anfield and Arsenal
  10. Matt Law reckons they’re not serious. He’s pretty good with Villa
  11. I don’t know how reliable James Ducker is these days but he reckons Man Utd will struggle to do the Sesko deal without sales first. It’s a flip of a coin between Watkins and Sesko for me, if they get one and we get the other I think both clubs will be happy either way.
  12. He’ll score plenty of goals wherever he goes to be honest.
  13. Not sure how reliable david McDonnell from the mirror is, but he reckons Man Utd are going for Watkins as we’re in pole position for Sesko and the fee is an issue.
  14. But anyway, I don’t feel great having a conversation about how well someone with cancer (who’s had it for at least a third of his time here) has/hasn’t done. He’s rightly got bigger fish to fry. So I’ll bow out of this one.
  15. Eh? We’ve progressed massively as a club, with him as CEO. That’s just a fact. How much of that is down to him we’ll never know, but that’s how it is. We feel even more rudderless now he isn’t here imo, which suggests he had some impact.
  16. we have as a club though, and that’s his ‘tenure’, regardless of what you think of him.
×
×
  • Create New...