Reading a bit of RAWK it is interesting to observe that the fans are slowly but surely becoming quite critical of KK even though the football they play is actually quite good most of the time; they just lack the cutting edge up front. Which is the exact opposite of where we are at: we have a cutting edge but the football we play is hardly exciting. Which led me to wonder: unless a manager can provide good results with attractive football, there is always going to be criticism, but what is worse: getting the results but not the attractive football right, or serving up a spectacle that ultimately fails to deliver the results? Personally, I think I can bare effective, non spectacular football that gets results for a good while, but ultimately I also want to see progress in the on the pitch performances in order to continue to fully support the manager. Thoughts?