Turnbull2000

Better not lose this. Need to be relentless till end of season

Forest are better than we were in our 4th season. More points, and can actually beat Liverpool.

We'd be title contenders with Wood and Anderson like Not usually in favour of Liverpool, but need them to rip Bournemouth's arses wide open

Forest will Bournemouth the shit out of us if we're not sharp enough. Could easily score 3 goals on the counter.

Needs to up his game to prove he's better than Chris Wood

Forest looking very good for top 4 now with Pool, Arse, Forest, City. Between us, Chelsea, Bourn and Villa for 5th.

Looks to me like... Red = Key boundary lines. Stadium and two streets of terraces. Blue = Traffic route Yellow = Metro line and potential extension

With financial shackles the way they are, might be no other choice.

I like it more than Everton's new stadium. Want it to look imposing and not where you'd expect to find a departure lounge.

If we want 5th place to ease our PSR woes, this is must win before a torrid set of fixtures. Going for an uncomfortable 2-1.

Today's prevailance of curved stadiums is to me just a more modern, costly version of the noughties identikit stadium trend. Would honestly prefer a flashier version of Milburn and Leazes to all four sides and some some nice big exposed cantilevers.

Reading Aston Villa are set to pocket £70m through this new CL format? Fuck me, that could give them a massive PRS advantage over us over the new few seasons.

Huge opportunity for the city or not, I expect Newcastle City Council planners, Freeman of the City, and local NIMBY groups to cause extensive delays or even force us to remain at St James.

Where did you get £17m from?!! Find that hard to believe. He's hardly played over the years. Worth more like £7m - but even that feels generous.

£65m for Duran and what, £40m to reach the CL last 16? That's an extremely profitable season so far for Villa. Can't be sure if the Duran sale is good or bad in terms of us trying to compete with them for 3rd-5th in the years ahead.

£60m for Watkins is outrageous. I'd put him at £40m. But what do I know about the market. Hopefully that chart showing Villa massively breaching UEFA cost controls is correct, and they're unable to afford the salary of a replacement.

We could potentially have a full squad available next month. Just imagine that Poor Wilson will probably ruin it though.

We're certainly closer to the likes of Leicester and Brentford than we are Arse, Chelsea and Liverpool though.

Main conversation should be squad cost rules now surely? If and when our 3 year rolling PSR period improves, squad cost limits means we either have to grow revenue or sell players before we bring anyone in. Profit and losses are irrelevant. And that assumes pay for our purples remains static. If Isak, Bruno and Tonali demand an extra 200K per week between them, we almost certainly can't afford to grow the squad.

I thought any additional spending risks breaching the new 70% squad cost rule? So incomings must be funded by outgoings until we grow revenue.

Should we really be clearing out the likes of Targett, Kelly and Longstaff? Unless we're brining in direct replacements who improve on these, we need these squad players for cover and early round cup games. It's not like our squad is well padded out.

Give it a couple of weeks, the typical BBC match report will be like 'Arsenal target Isak combined brilliantly with Manchester City target Sandro Tonali...'

Not just revenue, but I'd expect global fan base for the breakaway 6 (even inc. Spurs) are miles ahead of every other club as well. The Premier League probably sees it as commercially desirable to keep those teams at the top.

Match cam up

Hold on, Bournemouth have been better than over the past 50 games?!