Ronaldo

I remember his comments about Given "being selfish" about playing every game for his country talk first, think later, he's always been like that. cocksucker

Bomb it then. Loon + themanupstairs = in business

:lol:

this stuff seems to be in Skeletor's head only

He shouldn't be mention in the same breath as either of those tbh. give it 10 years, Taylor has more chance of being mentioned in same breath as JFK than Rio Ferdinand and Sergio Ramos Ok in 3 years we come back to this discussion and we will see who is right you do know that by 22 Ferdinand had already been called up to world cup 98 and euro 00. 2 years later he'd been bought twice to the sum of £48m. Look at Ramos, by 20 he was a regular for his country and his fairly big club. You're being a bit silly here, Taylor has time and time again been shown up by average strikers. If you said that in 3 years time, he'd be comparable to Aaron Hughes, you'd be a bit closer to the mark. p.s. Ramos looking mediocre at the Euro's??? He was bloody colossal all tournament Agree wholeheartedly with Tooj and Ronaldo on this one - Taylor aint in the same class. Needs a footballing brain to start with. taylor has the physical attributes to be a good defenfer, a very good one...if he gets a season or two playing in a stable defence with a leader next to him he'll improve look at how unsettled the defence, team, club and playing staff in general have been since he broke through some people need to give the guy a break - seen people on here talking about selling him FFS!! diabolical mate, i've asked this question a million times but i'm bored and cant sleep so i'll ask it again, what physical attributes exactly does Taylor have??? Physical attributes is just something people say when a player is over 6' and cant play football for s***

Then he's not suited to being a football owner. Partly true. It also means he could one day turn around and say f*** it, I want to win the Champions League in 2 years, splashing out on all sorts of galacticos Not exactly shown that kinda desire. I dunno, what about when he announced his favourite player was Alan Smith That just made me think he might be gay. or he could admire Smith's sheer brilliance with a ball at his feet

Then he's not suited to being a football owner. Partly true. It also means he could one day turn around and say f*** it, I want to win the Champions League in 2 years, splashing out on all sorts of galacticos Not exactly shown that kinda desire. I dunno, what about when he announced his favourite player was Alan Smith

at the end of the season yeah, fuck it, we dont need him right now or anything, we have Edgar incase owt happens

if he was english the 'white president' would be asking for £15M pay the extra

He shouldn't be mention in the same breath as either of those tbh. give it 10 years, Taylor has more chance of being mentioned in same breath as JFK than Rio Ferdinand and Sergio Ramos Ok in 3 years we come back to this discussion and we will see who is right you do know that by 22 Ferdinand had already been called up to world cup 98 and euro 00. 2 years later he'd been bought twice to the sum of £48m. Look at Ramos, by 20 he was a regular for his country and his fairly big club. You're being a bit silly here, Taylor has time and time again been shown up by average strikers. If you said that in 3 years time, he'd be comparable to Aaron Hughes, you'd be a bit closer to the mark. p.s. Ramos looking mediocre at the Euro's??? He was bloody colossal all tournament

it's becoming a no brainer tbh, we need a deal a lot more than they do Agreed start a petition and mail it to the club we dont we just mail them paper aeroplanes, a la Palace (h) 05

it's becoming a no brainer tbh, we need a deal a lot more than they do

Note they've neglected to mention any of the information already known in regards to this concerning the main issue being that Deportivo are apparently after a bit of extra cash. His agent has said we are the only club in for him plus he has supposedely agreed a contract would hope that would be enough to see this transfer through. Some facts bother me: It has been played out in the press The agent has said he knows Ramos very well Leindro (president) supposedly knows Ramos well Spurs have a lot in the coffers now and have got rid of Gardner and Kaboul We havnt tied this up quickly Hopefully the fact weve been working on it for 3 months shows our interest if we've been working on for 3 months, our transfer men need shooting with shite

I know this el presidente is basically the biggest cunt on earth but there's a time to stick to principle and a time to look the squad list, see Taylor, Faye, Cacapa and Edgar as our only CB's and act, quickly.

He shouldn't be mention in the same breath as either of those tbh. give it 10 years, Taylor has more chance of being mentioned in same breath as JFK than Rio Ferdinand and Sergio Ramos

Ameobi was one of the best english strikers for his age at 22 ok but ameobi sucks. and taylor is captains for u 21s well that's my point, are you pissed?

Inter, not to be petty

Ameobi was one of the best english strikers for his age at 22

a left side of defence consisting of Taylor and Warnock and things dont quite look so great, Faye and Enrique every time

if we decide to play 4-4-2 he's a more dangerous winger than Milner. In a 4-3-3 he's a good option considering the fact that Viduka will likely miss half the season for the record I hate Diouf as much as anyone, wife beating prick. Went into a garden centre near Worsley, greater mancs where a pal of mine worked a few years back and asked to buy a parrot

Diouf and Malbranque would get into our first team with ease tbh, the way things are now

chimbonda ahead of beye, having a laurf he didn't say that

it's sad that fools like this guy feel they should have to support a team from spain just because daddy owns a Deportivo scarf, Honestly, what is it with these people

a real defence is the midfield and defence both functioning well tbh. During Keegan's 2nd spell here we has a cracking midfield, didn't do the defence much good. We need 2 defenders, 2 midfielders and a striker you're right, we ain't getting them though are we?! well, i can certainly see us bringing in 2 defenders before sep 1st, the rest we'll have to pray for. But if we leave our midfield and attack the way it is, we're in for a long, hard season filled with 'injury crisis' excuses

dave do you really need this explaining? a club our size has much bigger income from ST sales, shirt sales, corporates & sponsorships etc... than the fulhams of this world therefore the 30-50m they receive needs to be used to mask the defecit, with us it does not - we've got the 5th biggest turnover in the league haven't we? are we 5th biggest spenders in the last year? are we f*** as other people say the club doesn't need to be 100% debt free, it just doesn't have to be riddled with it to the point of being totally f***ed again i'll ask for a straight answer from you or anyone else; lets say TV money is 40m a season - that means "ashley" will get 80m for last season and this one coming regardless of when it's paid... why are you accepting this money not being reinvested in the playing squad? or if not that money then the ST money, or sponsorship money? or any money? are you saying to me the club has to be self sufficient from the moment ashley bought it? why? why couldn't he invest some of the money based on future guaranteed income (the TV deal is over a fixed period so they know what they're getting and for how long)? we're not talking 100m here dave but what's been invested in the last year is a f***ing joke and you know it is not quite a joke but it's certainly a question that needs answering