Incognito

And he speaks the language He taaalks Jawdie leek ?

Anyone else see Van Persie try and "do" Glen Johnson ? Despicable rapist cunt.

This, a decent ball playing central defender is imperative now and if Colo is allowed to go, 2 of them. I like that lad at west ham, what's he called? Tomkins ? Every time I've seen him hes been cack if I'm being honest.

This, a decent ball playing central defender is imperative now and if Colo is allowed to go, 2 of them.

All looks good though not getting carried away until I see him at SJP in a b&w striped shirt.

Me too. Me three. Much better us spunking ten and a half million euro than fat cunt Ashley trousering it.

Sure we were here last week were we not ?

Compared to Brighton , it was.

I remember Sir Les doing that at Birmingham. Just before he left...........

Can see us nearly signing him this month. We will be so close.

its an addiction man i can't shake it even if i wanted to. You'd miss the bullshit if we turned into Barca. Not having that like... As a fan, when you support a team that's supposed to win, winning is just...eh. I mean, the trash talk ammunition is invaluable, but it's more relief than delight when it's over. At least personally. Shit teams that turn it around are fucking magic. We're kinda doing the Oberdance, but we'll get it right eventually. I realize another Newcastle fan said the same shit in 1939...but still. Are you saying Adolf Hitler loved the Toon like ?

How does it feel when you're Curtis Good.

He can talk a glass eye to sleep, IMO. The perfect cure for insomnia. Nowt wrong with Nass like.

You've misunderstood this again, in exactly the same way as it was last discussed. The point is about penalties and red cards being too harsh together and that the penalty should be punishment enough. But why is a penalty punishment enough? What if a player has an open goal from a yard out and the defender fouls him and thus prevents an absolute 100% certain goal? The chances of scoring from a penalty are far lower so the defender would benefit from this action. That is why a sending off is needed. This. In answer to below, not actually 100% but there are many instances where the penalty is a more difficult chance than the hindered opportunity. Yes but why does it have to be so black and white. The one that really irks me is when the attacker catches the defender's feet in their stride and naturally, at that pace, goes over. The defender hasn't even attempted a tackle yet still gets redded virtually every time. It cannot always be the right action to send someone off. Years ago referees used to officiate at their own discretion and not have FIFA dictate what they must be doing. FIFA has really taken the personal side we used to see with refs away, by preaching these ridiculous dictats. I believe it started when an injured player HAD to leave the field of play before re-entering the game. To stop the play acting. Has it worked? Of course it hasn't.

Players are getting redded for non deliberate fouls though...that's the crux of my argument.

I understand it if there's an open net and the striker is taken out by a defender before tapping the ball into the empty net, but sometimes a striker could be free on goal in the area and the last man could bring him down, but the keeper could be on top of the action and have a reasonable chance of stopping the goal when the foul took place....that in today's terms would still be a penalty and a sending off...obviously it's a penalty but a red card too? There's not enough discretion in the law for referees to use in such situations.

You've misunderstood this again, in exactly the same way as it was last discussed. The point is about penalties and red cards being too harsh together and that the penalty should be punishment enough. But why is a penalty punishment enough? What if a player has an open goal from a yard out and the defender fouls him and thus prevents an absolute 100% certain goal? The chances of scoring from a penalty are far lower so the defender would benefit from this action. That is why a sending off is needed. Firstly, is there such thing as an absolute 100% certain goal ? Secondly I think its harsh to penalize a player/team twice for one error. Penalties should be scored at the end if the day, but if they aren't tough shit.

You've misunderstood this again, in exactly the same way as it was last discussed. The point is about penalties and red cards being too harsh together and that the penalty should be punishment enough.

Felt and still feel many emotions about Souness. Sorrow isn't one of them.

Mix up of bete-noir and enfant terrible. Enoch Stelling.

Devoid of ideas No urgency Players with something to prove looking flat as a pancake. All of these things should be things that the manager must get right, if he doesn't he aint doing the job right. I'm not one who generally advocates change especially at our club where too much change has genuinely hurt us in the past. But I must admit I want Pardew out now. That performance was totally unacceptable and his behaviour after the whistle frankly isn't worthy of the manager of our great club.

His reaction, ie heading straight down the tunnel without shaking Poyets hand , makes me hope his resignation could be imminent.

No urgency No creativity No leadership 2 Ameobis

Ref casually overlooking Brighton fouls.

We were playing with 10 before he went off.