Jump to content

Lotus

Member
  • Posts

    5,544
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lotus

  1. f***.

     

    Oh well, hopefully he wont be here long.

    Much as I'm underwhelmed I really can't understand that attitude. Get behind him I say.

     

    Rather he was forced out before he spends our pennies to be honest.

     

    You've no idea who the board have considered for the role. If they have considered some big names, sounded them out and they dont want to come then your attitude is not just daft its dangerous for the club.

    If that was the case then sacking Allardyce while being so presumptious would seem very unwise.

  2. If we're going to comtinue with 2 DMs i think Carrick might be worth an inquiry. It seems he's out of favour at Manure and he can pass the ball pretty well with both feet. The other DM can be the one actually does the tackling...

    Maybe Diarra if it was in any way possible.

     

    Out of favour? 23 appearances this year.

    Really! Scrap that then. I thought they were playing a combo of Hargreaves and Anderson atm.

     

    Hargreaves has played far fewer times.

     

    Was injured for fecking ages. He's starting now and Carrick's got his rightful place on the bench. There's a gulf in class between them two.

     

    Carrick has started in six of their last eight matches, including their last two.

    can i ask where you are getting these stats, just so i can check them in future before i post ;-)

  3. If we're going to comtinue with 2 DMs i think Carrick might be worth an inquiry. It seems he's out of favour at Manure and he can pass the ball pretty well with both feet. The other DM can be the one actually does the tackling...

    Maybe Diarra if it was in any way possible.

     

    Out of favour? 23 appearances this year.

    Really! Scrap that then. I thought they were playing a combo of Hargreaves and Anderson atm.

     

    Hargreaves has played far fewer times.

     

    Was injured for fecking ages. He's starting now and Carrick's got his rightful place on the bench. There's a gulf in class between them two.

    Yeah, i thought it was because Hargreaves was injured. I would guess that Fergie would see Hargreaves starting ahead of MC as a DM fitness permitting. Scholes (if fit) or Anderson to play alongside them.

    Thinking about my post more now though, seeing as MC cost them £17m? i'm sure they wouldn't sell for anything like we'd be willing to pay.

  4. If we're going to comtinue with 2 DMs i think Carrick might be worth an inquiry. It seems he's out of favour at Manure and he can pass the ball pretty well with both feet. The other DM can be the one actually does the tackling...

    Maybe Diarra if it was in any way possible.

     

    Out of favour? 23 appearances this year.

    Really! Scrap that then. I thought they were playing a combo of Hargreaves and Anderson atm.

  5. If we're going to comtinue with 2 DMs i think Carrick might be worth an inquiry. It seems he's out of favour at Manure and he can pass the ball pretty well with both feet. The other DM can be the one actually does the tackling...

    Maybe Diarra if it was in any way possible.

  6. from what i can see we need a creative central midfielder or two, a right winger, a centre half as good as faye, and an entirely new set of attacking options

    the players we have for these positions at the minute are either too old, too injured, too crap, or all three, and thats just the players we NEED to replace, nevermind backup and squad strengthening

     

    Eh?

     

    That surely can't be right....I mean, just last season the only problems were the defenders and they've all been replaced with better players.....

    i don't think Rozenhal nor Cacapa look like good prem defenders yet, looking at them so far i'd say we've replaced players who weren't good enough with other players who still aren't good enough.

    well swapin bramble and ramage against rozi and cacapa??? hmmm. i'm pleased.

     

     

    They look about as good (or bad) as Bramble and Moore to me.

     

  7. from what i can see we need a creative central midfielder or two, a right winger, a centre half as good as faye, and an entirely new set of attacking options

    the players we have for these positions at the minute are either too old, too injured, too crap, or all three, and thats just the players we NEED to replace, nevermind backup and squad strengthening

     

    Eh?

     

    That surely can't be right....I mean, just last season the only problems were the defenders and they've all been replaced with better players.....

    i don't think Rozenhal nor Cacapa look like good prem defenders yet, looking at them so far i'd say we've replaced players who weren't good enough with other players who still aren't good enough.

  8. Giorgio Chiellini.

    Shaun Wright-Phillips.

    Javier Mascherano.

     

    :whistle:

    Not sure Chiellini would want the kind of competition Garrido is offering tbh. I mean what ambitious LB is gonna sign for you with a player like that in the shirt already???

  9. You know, we needn't get personal in these debates. Everybody wants the same thing and sometime all people are arguing over is semantics with their basic points being the same. Other times it's just different people thinking there are different ways of achieving the same ultimate goal, different paths up the mountain and all that.

     

    Bit more camaraderie wouldn't go amiss....

     

    Agreed.

     

    It's not easy when people claim you've posted comment you haven't actually posted and are also unable to understand something you did post. I'm sure you agree.

    Yeah, but we could all cut each other a bit more slack....

     

    Some people seem more interested in talking instead of listening. I'm NOT thinking of anyone in particular when i say that btw

     

    I'm not bothered if you are thinking of someone, tbh. I'm not paranoid enough to think it's me, but even if it is.....so what. It's a forum.

    Man.....it was a general comment, not directed at you or NE5 at all. I'm being genuine.

     

  10. You know, we needn't get personal in these debates. Everybody wants the same thing and sometime all people are arguing over is semantics with their basic points being the same. Other times it's just different people thinking there are different ways of achieving the same ultimate goal, different paths up the mountain and all that.

     

    Bit more camaraderie wouldn't go amiss....

     

    Agreed.

     

    It's not easy when people claim you've posted comment you haven't actually posted and are also unable to understand something you did post. I'm sure you agree.

    Yeah, but we could all cut each other a bit more slack....

     

    Some people seem more interested in talking instead of listening. I'm NOT thinking of anyone in particular when i say that btw

×
×
  • Create New...