Jump to content

ross magoo

Member
  • Posts

    1,646
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ross magoo

  1. So you don't agree that the ultras are not at least trying to get some atmosphere back in the ground? And only if you are so narrow minded that you cannot see past the mackem connection and realise that it is the truth to your second comment.

     

    I have a few questions on atmosphere: When did it go missing? What years do you think the noise was at its best at SJP? Why was the noise good then?

     

    The only way the so called lack of atmosphere will improve is if we see goals scored for our team, skillful players, attacking football, crunching tackles & the odd injustice always help raise the noise. Choir sections, standing area's is all bollocks really & is a ideology.

     

    The "prawn sarnie" crew how big is the pile at SJP? I am looking past the mackem connection & if you can see past the soundbite & give facts it would help me have a better understanding of your view point.

     

     

    do you not think the fans should be singing and supporting the team from the 1st whistle to the last without these things to encourage them?

     

     

     

    They probably should but I think it's unrealistic to expect that to happen.  Every team has a few fans who will sing regardless of results/form/excitement but most other fans won't.  If it was as simple as everybody just singing from start to finish then there would be a brilliant atmosphere at every football ground in the world but unfortunately it doesn't work like that.

     

    I think it's important to remember that top flight football is an entertainment industry and not all people go to the game to be fanatical.

     

    Sorry for going off topic btw.

     

    i see what you mean. its the main reason i prefer to goto away games than home games now. ibrox is only ever loud on champions league nights and old firm days

     

    You'll find that with about every club in the country.  The people who go to the away games tend to be most committed and fanatical.

  2. So you don't agree that the ultras are not at least trying to get some atmosphere back in the ground? And only if you are so narrow minded that you cannot see past the mackem connection and realise that it is the truth to your second comment.

     

    I have a few questions on atmosphere: When did it go missing? What years do you think the noise was at its best at SJP? Why was the noise good then?

     

    The only way the so called lack of atmosphere will improve is if we see goals scored for our team, skillful players, attacking football, crunching tackles & the odd injustice always help raise the noise. Choir sections, standing area's is all bollocks really & is a ideology.

     

    The "prawn sarnie" crew how big is the pile at SJP? I am looking past the mackem connection & if you can see past the soundbite & give facts it would help me have a better understanding of your view point.

     

     

    do you not think the fans should be singing and supporting the team from the 1st whistle to the last without these things to encourage them?

     

     

     

    They probably should but I think it's unrealistic to expect that to happen.  Every team has a few fans who will sing regardless of results/form/excitement but most other fans won't.  If it was as simple as everybody just singing from start to finish then there would be a brilliant atmosphere at every football ground in the world but unfortunately it doesn't work like that.

     

    I think it's important to remember that top flight football is an entertainment industry and not all people go to the game to be fanatical.

     

    Sorry for going off topic btw.

  3. I don't think the atmosphere at SPL ground is anything special.  There's a decent atmosphere at Tannadice whenever we play Dundee (when they're in our league and their fans aren't boycotting our ground), Aberdeen, Rangers and Celtic.  Apart from that it's usually quite flat.

     

    There was a rule a few years ago that all SPL clubs had to have a minimum of a 10,000 capacity all seated stadium.  Most of the clubs in the SPL only have a hard-core fanbase of about half their stadium capacity so most games are played in half-empty grounds

  4. If Rangers or Celtic were in the Premiership they would be up there with at least with us, Villa, Spurs etc, this would be  after going through a period of adapting.

     

     

    I think the "period of adapting" is an interesting one.  I can see it from both sides.

     

    Often, people form opinions of how the OF would do in the Premiership based on their current squad.  If they had guaranteed Premiership revenue and exposure then i'm pretty sure their squads would be considerably stronger than they currently are.

     

    But, on the other hand, would they get crowds of 60,000 if they weren't virtually guaranteed a victory every week?  History would suggest not.

     

    Valid points. Also they would not be guaranteed or as good as Champion League football.

     

    I don think they should be allowed in the Premier league, if they were then should start at the farthest point of the pyramid system. Also think it is ironic some Celtic fans don't class Scotland as the own country, they vote SNP, yet want they want the team they support to be in the EPL, talk about confused!!!!

     

    That's what i've always said.  Celtic have an identity crisis.  They're a Scottish club who think they're an Irish club but want to be an English club.

  5. They're going well but every team (even the one that wins the league) goes through a spell at some time in a season when they struggle.  Leeds, for obvious reasons, can't afford to have that sticky patch.  For that reason I can't see them winning the league.  If they do it'll be a fucking miracle tbh.

  6. If Rangers or Celtic were in the Premiership they would be up there with at least with us, Villa, Spurs etc, this would be  after going through a period of adapting.

     

     

    I think the "period of adapting" is an interesting one.  I can see it from both sides.

     

    Often, people form opinions of how the OF would do in the Premiership based on their current squad.  If they had guaranteed Premiership revenue and exposure then i'm pretty sure their squads would be considerably stronger than they currently are.

     

    But, on the other hand, would they get crowds of 60,000 if they weren't virtually guaranteed a victory every week?  History would suggest not.

  7. I guess it's the age old argument of whether Scotland needs a strong Old Firm or a competitive league.  Clubs like Aberdeen and my beloved Dundee United proved during the 1980s that they could cut it with the very best in Europe.  At the same time, we simply don't have the resources anymore (particularly post-Bosman) to compete with th Old Firm.  Hibs are a decent side but they won't have the squad to compete with the OF over the course of a season.  If it looks like they're in with a shout come Christmas then just watch the west coast media link every single one of their players with a move to Glasgow.

     

    If you asked me right now i'd say that Scottish football is currently punching above it's weight (and long may it continue btw).  We've had a number of fantabulous results in fairly quick succession but I think we can build on the optimism that has come from these results.

     

    On the anglo-scottish cup thing - great idea in theory, bad idea in practice.  There are too many fans on both sides who can't handle their drink and too many of my fellow countrymen who unfortunately have a pathological hatred of all things English.  UEFA wouldn't like the outcome.

  8. Provided it's a one footed tackle without the studs being raised i'd say that in this situation the tackle is ok (provided the ball is played before the man) because it seems to be from round the side of the ball carrier.  If the defender goes through the back of the ball carrier to win the ball then referees will award a free-kick.

  9. Tbh Luca, I think it's a bit ott aswell but we've got to remember that the Champs League is UEFA's showpiece event.  They (rightly imo) think it's more important than the World Cup.  I don't think they'll take any prisoners.

     

     

     

    It was one fan. There was riots in half of Man Uniteds games last year and they didn't get thrown out or points deducted.

     

    Nobody got onto the park in Rome though.

     

    When Demark played Sweden in a qualifier a few weeks back a fan ran onto the park and went for the referee.  The end result was an automatic 0-3 defeat for the offending nation.  I'm not sure if that game was abandoned or if that makes a difference but if that's the precedent then I think Celtic could be in a wee spot of bother.

  10. It probobly isn't justified but I'm in no doubt Celtic will get thrown out of the competition for this.

     

    hopefully :thup:

     

    I didn't expect any different div  :lol:

     

    They probably won't get thrown out of the competition for one reason and one reason only - it's the group stages.

     

    Celtic have lost to Shakhtar Donetsk but have still to play Benfica.  What happens to Shakhtar's points if Celtic are thrown out?

     

    That's a situation where the points/fixtures can't be reconciled without either Shakhtar or Benfica having legitimate grounds for complaint. 

     

    Personally, I think they'll be stripped of the points, fined a gazzillionsquillion spondoolies and forced to play the remainder of their home games behind closed doors.  UEFA might even deduct enough points to make it mathematically impossible for them to qualify but I think they'll be required to fulfil the remainder of their fixtures in the group stages for the above reasons.

     

    A bit over the top. Hope it doesn't go that way.

     

    Tbh Luca, I think it's a bit ott aswell but we've got to remember that the Champs League is UEFA's showpiece event.  They (rightly imo) think it's more important than the World Cup.  I don't think they'll take any prisoners.

  11. It probobly isn't justified but I'm in no doubt Celtic will get thrown out of the competition for this.

     

    hopefully :thup:

     

    I didn't expect any different div  :lol:

     

    They probably won't get thrown out of the competition for one reason and one reason only - it's the group stages.

     

    Celtic have lost to Shakhtar Donetsk but have still to play Benfica.  What happens to Shakhtar's points if Celtic are thrown out?

     

    That's a situation where the points/fixtures can't be reconciled without either Shakhtar or Benfica having legitimate grounds for complaint. 

     

    Personally, I think they'll be stripped of the points, fined a gazzillionsquillion spondoolies and forced to play the remainder of their home games behind closed doors.  UEFA might even deduct enough points to make it mathematically impossible for them to qualify but I think they'll be required to fulfil the remainder of their fixtures in the group stages for the above reasons.

  12. have you ever heard him try to say Chimbonda? god its awful to hear!

     

    Have you ever heard Paul Merson try to say anything? 

     

    Him and Ian Wright take the fuckin biscuit like.

     

    I actually like Wrightey. It's like having your very passionate England fan friend on the tele.

     

    That's the thing though, when I watch the football on the telly I want to hear incisive commentary and intelligent analysis for my license fee / Sky subscription.  If I want to listen to a biased, loudmouthed, opinionated clown i'll go and watch the game in the pub.

  13. I've got a mate who likes football but doesn't really like the fact that he likes football because he thinks football fans are charvers. I tell him that yeah some charvers like football, but that football supporters come from all walks of life and that if you weigh it up, the vast majority aren't. He's a season ticket holder as well, so christ knows how he's come up with this.

     

    Personally, whilst I don't mind watching Rugby, I can't stand the attitude of Rugby fans, who always seem to have it in for football and spout on about how Rugby sets a better example or how Rugby is a tougher sport and football is soft. It just strikes me that they are sour that Rugby's popularity is completely dwarfed by Football and that they are extremely jealous of that.

     

    I think you can say a similar thing about American sports - they're jealous because outside of America, not many people are bothered, and all the big American sports stars are virtually unknown outside of the US. They tried to export their sports to other countries, as Britain did with football, but their sports bombed and football took off. That kind of dents their belief that American is best and they don't like it, so they slag it off out of sheer jealousy.

     

    There are three sports I detest, and they are all British-invented sports - Cricket, Tennis and Golf.

     

    That's an interesting post.

     

    I agree with you about rugby fans and their holier than thou attitude.  How can a sport in which it's ok to punch people in the face set a good example?  I honestly don't see the skill in rugby.  The philosophy of it seems to be "I'm bigger than you so fuckin beat it".

     

    With the American thing, i'm not so sure that they're arsed what the rest of the world thinks of them and their sports.  A lot of them are probably unaware that there is a rest of the world.

  14. That was a strange game.  I was never comfortable until we got the third goal but in the end we could have won by more.

     

    Every time we got the ball wide we looked threatening.  All 3 goals came from wide areas.  West Ham only ever looked dangerous from set pieces - I remember them getting a few free headers which is a concern but we got away with it.

     

    Mike Riley  is a tw@t.  Why did he pull the game back to the half-way line for a free-kick to Newcastle when we were through on goal?  Fair enough if he'd booked somebody but he just spoke to the two players involved - completely nonsensical refereeing imo.

     

    I still don't agree with playing better players out of position to accomodate Alan Smith.  Hopefully Enrique will get a start soon and we can start playing Milner AND Zoggy down the flanks.

×
×
  • Create New...