manorpark

YES !!!!!!!!

We owe Liverpool one (for me) as our second final that I attended was the 1974 FA Cup Final defeat (my first was the 1969 Fairs cup Win) so - belatedly - we owe them one !!!

I do not think that is true, though I am aware that "some" people didn't rate AG.

A restaurant that is looking to open in the City Centre - https://ivycollection.com/locations/

Yes, P I F are intending to purchase a 49% stake in Newcastle International Airport.

Of course we have a hope - MORE than a hope. May take a while but PIF still do not intend to finish below FIRST. I know that, I knew it before the Takeover was approved, so why don't others?

PIF and the Reubens (and PCP) have done a genuinely excellent job since takeover to date. in my opinion, in terms of ALL financial and stadium-related issues, I would also say . . . W E . . A I N T . . S E E N . . N O T H I N G . . Y E T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There is no evidence of any "refusal" (I'm sure it would have strongly been leaked from somewhere) and in any case under the old rules they could not refuse it, only 'reduce it' to some fantasy FMV figure. Under the new rules WE set the figure and they (EPL) have to prove it is not FMV (if they can) which is much more difficult for them and easier for us to dispute.

That is how I understand it also, the onus of proof has been transferred from the clubs to the Premier League. I actually think that this is a big change in our favour, more than for most clubs, because of our rich Saudi business links.

It was a Tribunal, not a legal action in a court of law. We are still actually awaiting the Tribunals final report.

I am simply commenting on what you said babe !!!

If you read my post (a few up from here) you would have seen that the club cannot do it, the club cannot take external legal action against the EPL.

A bit paranoid, no matter what any "Media Noise" emanating from Manchester/London might say!

Who is this "we" ??

The Tribunal did not comment at all about the specific anti-competitive implications for Newcastle United FC. That remains untested legally.