Thomson Mouse

That's just bollocks by the way, he has already pleaded guilty to grooming, it's the hottest football topic, this is a football forum and it's highly relevant to the area. I think the bit that I've put in bold is the main point there tbf. We'd not rather anything you fruit, he's already admitted it, it just depends on the extent. I'm not pointing at fingers at anyone in particular, but the thread has had that feel to it at times. That it's more about how it's bad for Sunderland than it is for the girl. Sorry, bad quoting. That was aimed at Taylor.

That's just bollocks by the way, he has already pleaded guilty to grooming, it's the hottest football topic, this is a football forum and it's highly relevant to the area. I think the bit that I've put in bold is the main point there tbf. We'd not rather anything you fruit, he's already admitted it, it just depends on the extent.

What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Can't understand the 'at the minute' bit. It's like she's saying I'll see what happens when he gets out.

Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no"

There's a shit load more on that link KI posted

http://i.imgur.com/h76qgwA.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/U1WgnGY.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/oVJ9JVr.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/hgJ0GBg.jpg

The club needs to make a statement when the trial ends. If it turns out they did know, then someone should be sacked. I can't believe some of the head burying going on, from quite a lot of seemingly decent, level headed mackems and all. The chief inspector has already said the club knew about the case and the details. It has been mentioned under oath a few times that Byrne knew and had the whatsapp exchanges, police interviews etc. I think by Johnson and by DCI whateverhernameis. It would be pretty easy to disprove this and why would Johnson lie about this bit under oath? Wouldn't sunderland then have grounds to sue him? The fact they didn't in the first place, after he was sacked, is pretty damning Plus, the whole lying in court thing isn't a great idea........ Byrne may end up being used as a scapegoat. But even if the club release a statement, saying they were unaware and Byrne had kept it to herself, so she has been sacked because of it. Would you honestly believe that? Do you not think other people at the club, in positions of power, would be interested in what was going on, in such a high profile case? Do they not have board meetings or does nobody talk to each other at SAFC? Would Short not be asking what the situation is, with one of the club's star players, who is on bail for a very serious allegation? Our club is run by a pack of c***s and I have no problem in pointing this out, when they've acted badly. I just don't understand why sunderland fans are still trying to act like the club have done nothing wrong? I mean it's bad enough that he was never suspended, pending the outcome of the trial. Instead, they trotted him out every week, for your fans to applaud and cheer for. Now, it sounds as if they have been complicit in the whole thing, for 8-9 months. Yet they decided to do nothing and let him play, knowing full well he was guilty of at least the grooming and the kiss. yep, that's it for me as well. I think its because for years they have built this myth about Sunderland being a classy outfgit who always try to do the right thing. That of course has been blown out of the water if you'll pardon the expression. Totally agree about the corridors of power in the SOS, 'Has anyone bothered asking Ann about Adam and the kiddy stuff?' 'No, its not really relevant to the football side of it is it' They will have known right to the top, fortunately for them they are media irrelevant I'm pretty sure Johnson said in court that he hadn't met with Byrne but with other Sunderland officials. So others in the club must've known about it

Well the relevance is that people who know her didn't believe her. But really people shouldn't be giving their opinion on the truthfulness of the allegation. Because when you were that age at school and a girl in your year comes in and reckons she's 'done things' with a famous footy player your response would normally be 'oh right, was he shaved' or 'did he last longer than 10 seconds' Not all would it be 'aye right, f*** off man you lying s***.' The defence are getting kids at her school to say they didn't believe her

Is it just me who thinks they're missing something obvious? Is this highly paid, highly regarded barrister going to come out with something genius? Or have they just realised they're shafted?

I'm seriously confused now. Has he just thought that footballers just spend money on lawyers or something?

I think the point is that it's showing his dishonesty.

Only so much a lawyer can do when it's this bad Christ, it must be like watching this in that courtroom. Is his lawyer called George?

Ready to Groom

It's actually an excellent site if you move away from the Pure Football threads, with some really knowledgeable, intelligent posters. PF is like an asylum mind. Every time I look into the SMB section there seems to be loads of this kind of stuff IMMERGRANTS TAKING OUR BENEFITS AND JOBS http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/health-benefit-tourism.1202562/ MY NEIGHBOUR SINGS IN FORRIN! http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/potential-minefield-of-a-thread-here-but.1202452/ (bonus bantz about checking if he has a bomb vest or if he has a magic carpet) DID YOU HEAR "THEY" DON'T WANT YOU TO FLY THE BRITISH FLAG?! It's racist now. If you say you're proud to be English, you get thrown in jail. http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/flying-the-british-flag.1202250/ That's just on today's front page. We don't seem to get daily doses of that stuff on here. Too many f***ing forrins on here though, that's why. If you ask me, which you didn't. Cumin over hear takin ova our forum wif there muslamic raygums First thing I've agreed with on that forum

Absolutely, but it was his attitude here that said 'I couldn't give a s***'. He may have been in a position he wasn't happy with but there's plenty of footy players been in the same position and given all they can to the team. This was in Perth (oz) btw and we were told not to record any of it which was a waste of time as he said nowt controversial

Nothing earth shattering, but had a free ticket to a Jamie Carragher talk-in last night. It was fairly uneventful but he's obviously good mates with Owen, found it interesting that he said that he'd have gone to Liverpool after Madrid but Liverpool would only go as high as 12mill and when We came in with 16mill that was it as far as Madrid were concerned. Said he met up with Owen whole it was all happening and Owen was literally in tears when Liverpool wouldn't up their bid and he had to come to us but then said the wages would help soften the impact. Like I said, nothing earth shattering but makes me smile when I think of the 'one greedy bastard' chant.

While I can understand people jumping to this conclusion based on a stereotype, people seem to be forgetting that she is also carrying his child. She's not, theyve got a kid now. is it hot? It's 13 months old Irrelevant post guy. Aye

Would it be socially unacceptable for a footballer to have a fit bird/wife and just be like a normal couple?

While I can understand people jumping to this conclusion based on a stereotype, people seem to be forgetting that she is also carrying his child. She's not, theyve got a kid now. is it hot? It's 13 months old

While I can understand people jumping to this conclusion based on a stereotype, people seem to be forgetting that she is also carrying his child. She's not, theyve got a kid now.