-
Posts
3,561 -
Joined
Everything posted by Jackie Broon
-
This is what I've been asking for days. Suppose the jury must just decide who to side with in all these paedophile cases where the only witness is the victim... I honestly don't know. Yeah, while I reckon he probably did have a feel, even with that I wouldnt be sure 100% Can he get time for the other two things he pleaded guilty for? Reckon after all this we might see him with community service and a fine(?) The test is not "all doubt", it's "reasonable doubt". No offence like, but you are demonstrating the main problem with the jury system, normal people struggle to understand where the line is between reasonable doubt and absolutely no doubt, juries can be easily swayed too far to the side of caution by a good barrister representing someone that can afford one. The jury don't have to have been there and seen it to convict. It's a balancing exercise, one persons word against another can and often does lead to criminal convictions, especially when there is evidence the tips the balance. The jury can weigh the content of the messages, the admission of intent and everything else in the balance. It's not 'pics or it didn't happen'.
-
They almost certainly knew he was guilty, this is from a legal fella I know......"SAFC would have had copies of the advice from Counsel (Orlando Pownall QC is a big, big cheese in crime) and copies of the prosecution evidence once he was charged. They will have known the content of the whatsapp messages straightaway." They knew and played him to save themselves, which is utterly despicable in my opinion, and you're right, the FA should investigate it. The classy c***s. Would they have all that though? Strictly speaking they're nothing to do with this case, it's a matter between the crown and Johnson. Basically if an employee is charged with a child sexual offence, then there is procedure to follow for the employers. As a football club would have children of all ages on it's premises, they have a duty to consider there being any further risk of him reoffending while on bail. That is why in most cases like this, the employee would be suspended pending the outcome, simply to be on the safe side. Most SAFC fans seem to think that the club would simply ask him if he was guilty, he denies it, and they carry on, innocent until proven guilty and all that. However there's more to it than that. The club need to investigate further to see if they aren't putting children at risk, their legal people must have spoken to him, social services and the police. They would also have had to look into the CPS case itself and as my legal friend has said, they would have known the details of the case and the evidence against him. If they didn't do this, they were negligent themselves. I think at the very least they have turned a blind eye to this. If the CPS are pushing for prosecution you can bet they have good grounds for doing so. Sunderland have stuck their fingers in their ears and shouted 'la la la la can't hear anything' over the entire duration until he admitted to it. My view is that they did know and played him anyway, I cannot believe otherwise, it seems incomprehensible that they would not have had doubts at least. They kept playing him for one reason, he is one of their best players. Not sure if I am completely missing the point but it seems to me that it's more a case of the PFA being at fault than the SMB's...from what I can gather... The PFA's duty is to represent the interests of players, like any union should their members. The club has a duty to safeguard children. Whatever the PFA's position, it was the club's choice what to do, in similar circumstances almost any other employee would have been suspended. The club allowed Johnson to stay, for a year, in a position that we now know he exploited to have sexual contact with a child. Whatever they knew about the evidence, whatever pressure they had from the PFA, he should have been suspended.
-
Clearly never watched us play Actually said as much last time he was on. Wants the job. Aye, it was a strange response and there was something about it that made me think he was positioning himself for the job, or has already been lined up
-
I just hope they cling on until the penultimate week so we can be the ones to send them down. http://www.themag.co.uk/assets/aston-villa-sob-on-the-tyne-banner-newcastle-united-nufc-650x400.jpg
-
Can't see that happening. He may resign but the club hierarchy have long since rolled over and accepted relegation, sacking him would just cost money they don't want to spend.
-
Chelsea 5-1 Newcastle United - 13/2/16 post match discontent from pg. 36
Jackie Broon replied to Greg's topic in Football
According to the commentators the problem may be that we've brought in too many players. -
Chelsea 5-1 Newcastle United - 13/2/16 post match discontent from pg. 36
Jackie Broon replied to Greg's topic in Football
As if the useless cunt could get the team to 'stick' anyway. I guarantee he sent the team out with instructions to 'keep it tight for the first 20 minutes'. -
Alan 'I thought they were saying Boo urns' Pardew http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/familyguy/images/8/8d/Burns-excellent.gif
-
They're not married, if she'd left him she only would've been entitled to £15,000 per year child support, that's when he was earning £60,000 per week. Can't blame her for wanting to stay on the gravy train. She's also clearly been lied to by him about what really happened, it's been reported she walked out when they were reading the messages today.
-
Based on income isn't it? He's not going to be having much of that.
-
You'd think so, but something like half of Premier League footballers are bankrupt within 5 years of retiring.
-
Players are with us because they are flawed. If a player were complete with skill, pace, great decision making and consistency they would be playing for Man City, Chelsea, Barcelona instead of us. Sissoko has flaws and can be frustrating, but that's why he plays for us and not a top team.
-
Only thing that can save us now. For all the talk of Ashley wanting us to follow the 'Arsenal model', surely its Everton that Ashley should be looking too. There're the prime example of how to compete on a relative shoestring in the premier league and the man that set that all up is currently unemployed. But we're not interested, and vica versa, because he'd want full control over transfers... Like our current setup is such a sucess in that department!
-
Everton 3-0 Newcastle United - 03/02/16 - Post-match reaction from page 43
Jackie Broon replied to Greg's topic in Football
Line-up from .cock: Very apt! -
So what's the crack with him and Pulis? http://www.thesecretfootballer.com/articles/the-secret-footballer/29898/strange-case-of-star-player-caught-in-middle-of-chairman-manager-transfer-standoff/
-
I don't think Peace is going to accept any offer until it's too late for Pulis to spend the money. There's probably no point in us going back with offer after offer. If Peace is willing to sell this window, he's probably waiting until the last minute to do it.
-
If the secret footballer story has any truth to it the chairman might be temped to sell right at the close of the window so Pulis won't have time to spend it.
-
In previous January windows we've gone after / got the likes of Shefki Kuqi and Carlton Cole, it's a huge step up from those days. Gomis would be better than nothing, and certainly better than previous panic buys.
-
won't do though the land is being sold off and the fans are not putting up enough fuss so unfortunately we are f***ed with this size stadium forever Tbh, we don't need a bigger stadium, we wouldn't fill it. Even back during the Robson era there were empty seats at most league matches, for the Champions League matches it was half empty. Maybe if we had Dortmund-esque ticket prices it would be different, but that's just a pipe-dream in modern top flight English football, never going to happen anywhere. Don't think it was quite half empty for our CL matches.. I remember there being tonnes of empty seats. I wasn't intending 'half empty' to be taken literally btw, I'm know the attendances weren't 26,000, more like 40ish for most of them.
-
won't do though the land is being sold off and the fans are not putting up enough fuss so unfortunately we are f***ed with this size stadium forever Tbh, we don't need a bigger stadium, we wouldn't fill it. Even back during the Robson era there were empty seats at most league matches, for the Champions League matches it was half empty. Maybe if we had Dortmund-esque ticket prices it would be different, but that's just a pipe-dream in modern top flight English football, never going to happen anywhere.
-
That's a hit and a half. Ashley sold £200m worth of shares last year. I imagine he'll see this slump in value as an opportunity to increase his shareholding again, as he has done very successfully in the past.
-
Sign Mascherano? Nah, Hayden Mullins fits in better.
-
If you had an ATM card that gave you access to £100,000,000 a year (and rising) in cash, would you chuck it away? The tv bubble will burst within 3 years. Need the guy to get a love for the club again and invest Get a love for the club again? He hates the club and the fans as shown by his behaviour over the last 8-9 years. All he wants is the TV and prize money and, as pointed out above, the free advertising (worth £25m a year and rising) which is 20% interest in lieu of interest on the supposedly 'interest free 'loan' he somehow owes himself, and which he has paid down not one penny. 17th is the goal, that's it. We're not a football club any more. There are only three clubs in the league whose sole aim is to chug along in mid-table and rake in the TV money, it's obvious from the table which they are. It doesn't work anymore, there's too much money available to every club, when every other club is putting in 100% effort no club can afford not to do the same. If he doesn't tear up this self defeating, doomed business model and spend big this month he's going to lose that income. He's not going to be able to fluke his way back to the honeypot at the first attempt this time too, he dismantled the spirit and backbone that did that for him last time. It's not about love, if he doesn't wake up and see that aiming for mediocrity is no longer a sustainable way to run a premier league club he is going to personally lose a lot of money.
-
Dawson would be an okay signing, in the short term, to play / fill-in alongside Mbemba. Provided that it would leave more funds available to spend elsewhere, where our main defensive issues lie (central midfield and left back).
-
However, perfect timing for the post sacking performance boost.