cp40

That would be the main issue for me, as well. Had this discussion last weekend with my old uncle, who is the biggest football head I've ever known. I think, if fit, then that team has all of our best players on the pitch (Joe Cole absolutely has to play for me), but it could be guilty of squeezing them all into the starting XI at the expense of tactics (in some instances). Still think ,they think they are actually far better than they really are. So does everyone in the world, about everything. Do they?

That would be the main issue for me, as well. Had this discussion last weekend with my old uncle, who is the biggest football head I've ever known. I think, if fit, then that team has all of our best players on the pitch (Joe Cole absolutely has to play for me), but it could be guilty of squeezing them all into the starting XI at the expense of tactics (in some instances). Still think ,they think they are actually far better than they really are.

Self acclaimed big time charlies getting humiliated, simple as.

The bird is an irritating listen. she talks like a contestant off the apprentice.

I fully expect the interest in this to increase next week, when we have a game, the forum gets a lot more members visiting.

could do with one less, when you fuck off.

Yeah, Ton up. keep it up kids were on a roll.

mate the world is full of people who say no to everything without a reason, rather than DO something positive, they will denigrate the actions of proactive people,

If I do it I'll go alone. No offence lads but it sounds complicated enough, without having 20 or 150 different stakeholders and opinions covering just one share. You'll need a commitee and president for each share judging by the diverse opinions on here. Could have different shares for different factions. The we-want-Keegan-back syndicate, the we-don't-want-Keegan-back syndicate etc ridiculous, we've already stated earlier in the thread, the Poll facility of the forum is a ready made device to reach a consensus on issues.

like it, we need the admin to agree, as they will be organising the purchase, demarcation of voting etc.

who wants a return?. put it in an ISA if that matters.

on the other hand wheres the harm in a preliminary hearing, the main obstacle i view for the nust is I can't see Ashley wanting to sell to them, they're negotiating position is weak to begin with and possibly offending the current regime by not meeting them isn't a good way to start. No offending has taken place, we've politely declined his offer under the logic of we dont want to waste their time if we cant raise the funds. I think the fact Llambias called an hour after we launched tells you that hes happy to sell. or he's simply curious about it, asking for a meeting to discuss it could also be a way of politely saying not interested in selling, thanks for the interest. my suspicion would be he would try and get NUST on board with ashley, just to get thier hands on the investment, then sell the club further down the line anyway.

SSN. now. Premier league clubs reject proposals to admit Celtic and Rangers.

Toontastic are talking about didvidends to charity, which is good. but i say charity begins at home. Dividends could go to the running costs of this forum,.

totally agree, i cant go a 1500 now but cud next yera maybe. It would also be good if the forum could keep taking donations, and continue to increase its stake.

top post. lets just get the forum owning as many shares as possible.

like Midds said earlier, if we can find 10 people at that level, that ten get thier own NO share between them. 150 will share the £10 one, 75 share the £20 one, and so on....

75 yes votes , buys 1 share at £20 a pice now.

If I remember correctly the wording on the site is you can donate from £10 upwards so by that phrasing it suggests you don't get a vote unless you put in £1500 min. Unless you do it through a group like has been mentioned for on here. Yeah, and the £10 upwards is the bit thats causing me a little confusion, if its merely a donation (as I believe it is and we both agree it reads like) then why put a minimum amount on it? might just be poor wording or confusion on my behalf. Maybe we're thinking of sending them a certificate or something and the tenner ensures that the costs of that are covered in the donation. prehaps your website could make people aware that there are some syndicates being proposed for buying shares like on here,.( maybe with our Admins permission some links? i know toontastic are doing something similar with a £30 pledge each) tbh I dont think that helps either side out though. At the end of the day we want as many of these "shares" to be sold. If we direct people to here or TT then it could just mean that the price per share on here drops to a quid say and you still only purchase one or two. Having them create their own with friends, family, workmates etc would result in more shares being bought. At the same time for here, you should want to keep it among the regulars and not open it up to thousands that will pop in once, hand over a quid and then disappear only to jump back up once in a blue moon and ask for their cash back. I do agree the website needs a little more clarity on that side of things though. i dont think it will go as low as a pound. At £10 / 150 poeple , we will then be looking at multiple shares.

If I remember correctly the wording on the site is you can donate from £10 upwards so by that phrasing it suggests you don't get a vote unless you put in £1500 min. Unless you do it through a group like has been mentioned for on here. Yeah, and the £10 upwards is the bit thats causing me a little confusion, if its merely a donation (as I believe it is and we both agree it reads like) then why put a minimum amount on it? might just be poor wording or confusion on my behalf. Maybe we're thinking of sending them a certificate or something and the tenner ensures that the costs of that are covered in the donation. prehaps your website could make people aware that there are some syndicates being proposed for buying shares like on here,.( maybe with our Admins permission some links? i know toontastic are doing something similar with a £30 pledge each)

i was just a way to keep count of the yes for a 1st count rich. the nuts and bolts arn't that important at the moment, just gauging the size of the interest.

lol, good decision,... closing dates on all polls.

get your name down then we are only looking for another 9,999,999

could be difficult organising the voting rights with that one. I dont follow...seperate forum for each share obviously... i understand that, but it sounds complicated to administer. I think it's pretty easy actually. Just a case of ticking the right boxes on the permissions jobbie. ok i was thinking of the headache admin would have, forgot they had a numbers genius. Nah, just call each board Share 1, Share 2 etc and give each member of each share permission to post and vote in it. Genius!

could be difficult organising the voting rights with that one. I dont follow...seperate forum for each share obviously... i understand that, but it sounds complicated to administer. I think it's pretty easy actually. Just a case of ticking the right boxes on the permissions jobbie. ok i was thinking of the headache admin would have, forgot they had a numbers genius.