Scoot

Not like this lot to draw.

This is what I was just thinking. I wish I'd never fucking heard another thing about it. Now I'm just gutted/pissed off all over again. Hate the premier league the fucking corrupt bastards. They're never ever going to let anyone challenge the top 6. Ever.

The Premier league are adamant this isn't going through like. Won't officially reject it so no one can appeal and obviously won't approve it. What a bunch of corrupt fucking twats.

Was just going to post exactly that. This is just fantastic this.

Yea I’m a bit baffled by this. That’s how I see it too. Because there's clear indication that they don't accept the decision, which gives them thr option of seeking independent adjudication, free of bias and influence which has clearly corrupted this process. How can that not be a positive? Which is possibly what the premier league want as well as it takes any decision making away from themselves which stops bein getting pissed off with them.

So, PIF are actually back at the table. Very interesting.

I reckon muto and Saivet willie on canny wages that no clubs from other European leagues could or would pay. We'll be stuck with them.

Knew it wouldn't take them long to come up with some bstshit crazy way in which Danny Graham is a better signing than Callum Wilson. Utterly deluded morons.

Is that an actual footballer? Fuck off He's back though!!!!!

"He's back" Wonder which one of them says they'd rather have Graham than Wilson.

Keep seeing people say "his terrible injury record" and wonder if they've just read that somewhere and just gone with it. The lad made 35 premier league appearances last season and 30 the season before. That's 11 games hes not been involved in in the last 2 years. Hardly this horrendous injury record I keep seeing being mentioned is it.

I think its more aimed at fans of other clubs and reporters and pundits who were against the takeover and telling us how terrible it would be.

Remember though, the premier league are looking after our interests by not approving the Saudi consortium and making us carry on with Ashley. Thanks premier league.

Bottled it against a championship side. This next season is going to be a joke of epic proportions.

Which means, its effectively dead.

Has he deleted it as I ant see it.

Exactly how I feel. I don't think i will ever get over what the corrupt twats have done and the huge opportunity for us that they have went out of their way to stop. All they've done is look out for the interests of the top 6, it's all that matters to the premier league. Everyone else is just there to make the numbers up. They really dont care which 14 teams it is but they'll make sure no one ever challenges the top 6 on a consistent basis.

Didnt even know we were playing. 5-1 against fucking boro? This season is going to be hilarious. A combination of Ashley for 13 years and then the premier league have fucked us over and we'll see the outcome this coming season.

Crazy how many people just don't get what that NUFC360 account is all about.

Exciting!!!

At the end of the day, whatever the reasons for it collapsing all I will say is, if this same consortium had bid for ANY of the top 6 clubs there is absolutely no way it wouldn't have been approved. It may have taken slightly longer than the 2 to 4 weeks that was mentioned but there is literally no way the premier league would have acted in the same way as they did with us. I'm 100% convinced this. It's a closed shop at the top of the league, everyone else is just expected to be happy to make up the numbers every season.

Hi Richard!

Absolutely not. Why would anybody not want to see a local player do well and get to play for NUFC? Well apart from it all being a bit pointless of course. Local? Croydon is canny near.

Not thick at all. Looking at the situation with critical eyes Nothing to stop him doing some actual journalism and checking to see if what he's been told is actually based in any kind of factual world. Unless it was just an interview and reported as one, rather than taking a single source as gospel That's fine in most scenarios, but with one source (we are assuming) involved in a highly confidential process, I'm not sure how feasible that is. In that case a decent journalist wouldn't report as fact, and would write as an opinion piece. Probably not feasible to report with checks, but that should have been made clear. Caulkin reported numerous times that all he was doing was passing on what he had been told but couldn't vouch for the veracity of what he had been told. Thickos man!