Rompe

Almiron is supposed to be really good, from what I hear.

Cringeworthy celebration that. I wonder how many times a day he fucks himself.

I've come to that conclusion based on the fact that the people in charge of Juventus probably aren't mentally retarded enough to deny allegations that Ronaldo has already admitted. I could be wrong of course. You're going round in circles! 'Why do you believe in God? Because the Bible says so. Why do you believe the Bible? Because it's from God! ` I explained it in my next post, but sure, I'll go again. Ronaldo has admitted to rape in a document to his legal team. This gives us two options when looking at Juventus' reaction in light of your argument that they haven't seen any credible proof/information regarding the rape. Juventus may choose not to believe this, they may deem it as "not credible", but that makes them wrong, because it is credible proof, it's an admission of guilt from Ronaldo. Juventus may not have seen it, which means they do not want to see it. :lol: Go home, buddy, you're a dipstick! Out of arguments, embarassed and humiliated. Sad story Dinho Lad, but you'll bounce back. Seriously, do you still not see how stupid your argument is? Utterly stupid. What's stupid about it?

I've come to that conclusion based on the fact that the people in charge of Juventus probably aren't mentally retarded enough to deny allegations that Ronaldo has already admitted. I could be wrong of course. You're going round in circles! 'Why do you believe in God? Because the Bible says so. Why do you believe the Bible? Because it's from God! ` I explained it in my next post, but sure, I'll go again. Ronaldo has admitted to rape in a document to his legal team. This gives us two options when looking at Juventus' reaction in light of your argument that they haven't seen any credible proof/information regarding the rape. Juventus may choose not to believe this, they may deem it as "not credible", but that makes them wrong, because it is credible proof, it's an admission of guilt from Ronaldo. Juventus may not have seen it, which means they do not want to see it. :lol: Go home, buddy, you're a dipstick! Out of arguments, embarassed and humiliated. Sad story Dinho Lad, but you'll bounce back.

I've come to that conclusion based on the fact that the people in charge of Juventus probably aren't mentally retarded enough to deny allegations that Ronaldo has already admitted. I could be wrong of course. You're going round in circles! 'Why do you believe in God? Because the Bible says so. Why do you believe the Bible? Because it's from God! ` I explained it in my next post, but sure, I'll go again. Ronaldo has admitted to rape in a document to his legal team. This gives us two options when looking at Juventus' reaction in light of your argument that they haven't seen any credible proof/information regarding the rape. Juventus may choose not to believe this, they may deem it as "not credible", but that makes them wrong, because it is credible proof, it's an admission of guilt from Ronaldo. Juventus may not have seen it, which means they do not want to see it.

It's either ignorance or malice on Juventus' part. Either they don't want to know, or they know but don't care.

I've come to that conclusion based on the fact that the people in charge of Juventus probably aren't mentally retarded enough to deny allegations that Ronaldo has already admitted. I could be wrong of course.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. They have seen information that is credible to them, Ronaldo has pretty much admitted rape to his lawyers. Yeah, where? What a magazine reports does not count, btw! (Because that's not how it works in the business and legal world, just before you ask why! ) http://www.spiegel.de/international/cristiano-ronaldo-kathryn-mayorga-the-woman-who-accuses-ronaldo-of-rape-a-1230634-2.html In response to the question as to whether Ms. C. ever raised her voice, screamed or called out, X responded, according to the document: "She said no and stop several times." In the document, X says that she was lying on her side. "I entered her from behind. It was rude. We didn't change position. 5/7 minutes. She said that she didn't want to, but she made herself available." And further: "But she kept saying 'No.' 'Don't do it.' 'I'm not like the others.' I apologized afterwards." That's from Ronaldo himself.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. They have seen information that is credible to them, Ronaldo has pretty much admitted rape to his lawyers.

How many times he been sent off though? A complete liability.

The same happened with Andy Tate, started believing his own hype and it just wasn't as funny anymore.

16 goals in 21 games for Fulham and 8 goals in his last 9 games for Serbia. All he needed was a run of games...

Schär with a delicious backheel assist

Schär with an assist against Iceland. 2-0.

Kevin Mbabu starts for Switzerland against Iceland.

Is he shit again now?

Not really. Seen far worse. We defended really well. Still we let in 2. Rather we have a go and lose, than not trying at all. This game was lost before it started. Missing Shelvey and leaving Lascelles obviously didn't help, but this was shocking. It absolutely was not lost before it started. We defended very well, and until they got that dodgy penalty they weren't really all that threatening. Tactics spot on today.

What are you expecting from him in a game like this?

Wan Bissaka, Salah, Oliver, they're all in cahoots man. It's a racket, orchestrated by foreign agents who wants to denigrate the EPL.

The decision wasn't taken on the pitch today. There is a list, and he is numer two on it behind Ritchie.

I dunno why, but I could see Dummett taking a good no nonsense penalty. Dummett :lol. Dont even remember him having a shot on target, ever. He scored that magnificent goal against Manchester United.

When they appear going into someone's leg its usually a bit dreaded yes They didn't I suggest you watch a replay. Cos they did. They didn't

When they appear going into someone's leg its usually a bit dreaded yes They didn't

Don't really see what's wrong with this tweet.

Ok then if you want to take the same year, 2014, We signed Rivière for 6.5m, Mahrez cost about a 10th of that. The same year we also signed Lascelles for 5 million. Far from shit. Transfer fees mean nothing unless you are buying a well established top international player, something we’re not ever going to do while Mike Ashley is here. So shut the fuck up and learn to accept when your opinion is wrong. Good players in general cost more than bad players. If a player is good a buying club is willing to pay more money to sign him.