Bimpy474

There's no way Bruce is behind the idea of shutting down Fernandes, it's good tactically but no way is that him coming up with it.

It's amazing how everyone but Bruce can see it, play your best goalkeeper you thick oaf.

Sticking with Darlow

Newcastle have lost seven of their past nine Premier League matches. They have lost all three league games without scoring in the absence of Callum Wilson. The striker has scored 10 and assisted five of Newcastle's 25 league goals The Magpies have sustained nine defeats in 11 away matches and failed to score in eight of those fixtures. Manager Steve Bruce has taken just one point from 11 Premier League visits to Old Trafford, a 2-2 draw with Sunderland in October 2009. :lol: Doing a good job like.

Why is he holding his head

Are there two red cones on the edge of Arsenals box ? :lol:

Eh ? there was no offside at anytime then What the fuck was the lino looking at

Yes, it is full of "easily influenced" people, particularly whenever there are no 'leaks' about the Takeover for them to "believe" or to "rubbish" !! The very best times for our Takeover are when it is totally quiet, as that is the ONLY way that progress (legal and/or arbitration etc) on our Takeover can happen. That IS exactly what is happening at the moment - as logic surely dictates. As Garland Greene said - Define Irony ?

On closer inspection these are loafers :lol:

Ashley's shoes :lol:

Why 4 ? love the randomness in here.

Sheffield United away...absolute banker we would lose that.

That one where we were 2-0 up under Rafa hurt the most. Aye. Remember a blatant handball by Ashley Young in the box in first half at 0-2 not being given, if we go 0-3 up we win that. Yep, ref wasn't even looking at the ball when it was taken (free kick by Shelvey).

But you didn't end up hating him with all your soul Nope, weirdly enough. I save that for Bruce. Agreed and what i was getting at, Bruce is on another level.....the Pardew Parallel I shall call it.

Harsh on Anon like.

Aye Darlow has performed well but play your best goalkeeper you stupid oaf.

Loss. Well shit.

Sure, it might not be. But I think it's unlikely it isn't connected now, as the amount of money involved for Staveley is absolutely huge in comparison to her estimated net worth. I just can't see her using a case against Barclays, winning it hopefully so she can fund part buying us, or paying back borrowing to buy us. Just sounds like pure fantasy. 2+2=5 like. A couple of petrol shop owners just bought out Asda with Asda's own money, stranger things can happen. I'm just saying that it can't be ruled out is all. In the pre-Covid times when things were more stable, it was easier to risk a bigger % of your assets on seemingly risky ventures. But now the risks are higher due to the volatility and unpredictability of the economy, she may not be as willing to part with whatever standing capital that she had available outside the Barclay's case at this point in time. So my overriding point is the outcome of the case would matter more now, than it did when it was initially brought. However, I do agree it's far fetched that the takeover bid was launched predicated on funds from a court case not even brought yet. There's more nuance to this than some are suggesting. Oh I would agree with that, but I think in our desperation we're seeing mirages. I hope I'm wrong like, I really do.

But you didn't end up hating him with all your soul

Aye, that's my view.

Sure, it might not be. But I think it's unlikely it isn't connected now, as the amount of money involved for Staveley is absolutely huge in comparison to her estimated net worth. I just can't see her using a case against Barclays, winning it hopefully so she can fund part buying us, or paying back borrowing to buy us. Just sounds like pure fantasy. 2+2=5 like.

What an inspiration Bruce is :lol:

Did it occur that maybe one is not connected to the other ?

How could you know that, or anyone else for that matter ? That just sounds like something plausible but it reality is just utter nonsense.

Doh !!!