Jump to content

Joey Linton

Member
  • Posts

    2,570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Joey Linton

  1. 43 minutes ago, Joey Linton said:

    It's two things, firstly too many people seem unable to separate what everyone wants to happen (a takeover, but not necessarily by this group) from what's actually happening. The second is the local press are more than happy to string it along as it's easy to write about and always generates traffic. The Chronicle in particular manage to equate absolutely everything to "the takeover". 

    https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/newcastle-united-fa-cup-final-20608316

     

    Like that 

  2. 3 minutes ago, Ankles Bennett said:

    I think there is more to this takeover than we realize.  Ashley is adamant he will only sell to the Saudi led consortium which makes me think he has an agreement to the sell open his SD shops in the KSA in particular in that new city KSA are building where the focus is to actively promote sporting health!!!

    Would that not directly contradict the separation stuff though? 

    Should add i think he'd sell to the first person to offer what he wants and pass the ODT. 

  3. It's two things, firstly too many people seem unable to separate what everyone wants to happen (a takeover, but not necessarily by this group) from what's actually happening. The second is the local press are more than happy to string it along as it's easy to write about and always generates traffic. The Chronicle in particular manage to equate absolutely everything to "the takeover". 

  4. 21 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

    I'd go with this:

                                                        Big Phil Banks

                 O'Donoghue          Keith           Gordon           Ally McBeal

                            De Marco               Fatima              Jowels

                             OJ's laywer    MJ's lawyer    Adam J's lawyer              

    Whitley in for McBeal and you're not far off there. 

  5. 21 minutes ago, Hhtoon said:

    Positive people do tend to be passionate by nature to be fair. Just like negative people tend to be relentless knobs like JoeyLinton. 

    I don't actually mind your posts as at least you engage/have actual points, just in the wrong takeover thread :D

    Relentless? I've not posted on this thread all week until today. :lol:

     

    Even then it was to ask a question, which was swerved (twice). 

     

     

    Not like someone on this thread to make something out to be way more significant than it really is though. That would never happen. :lol:

  6. 3 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

    :lol: You get someone’s point of view wrong and then throw a strop. 

    If you think it's bad now, wait until all of this doesn't lead to the takeover being completed. Then when you point out you were actually right, it'll be "can't believe you're celebrating it not going through". 

     

  7. 2 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

    You think it’s non evidence, however 2 leading QC’s, the club and a bloke experienced in winning competition cases think it is.

    With all respect I’ll take there opinion over yours on this matter.

    I'll try again If you think this statement is incorrect can you let us all know what this evidence was actually evidence of?

  8. 4 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

    All about building a picture and last nights evidence is a part of that.

    No way are they going to let the PL see all their cards on a podcast, and he clearly stated last night it was going to be evidence already in public domain.

    Look I’m not going to persuade you and Fantail any differently, respect your opinions but let’s not waste each other’s time.

    A judge will look at this evidence in next couple of weeks and if your right he will throw the case out. 

    But trust me he won’t and it’s going to get very interesting.

    Again with "last night's evidence", there was no evidence.  If you think this statement is incorrect can you let us all know what this evidence was actually evidence of? 

  9. 5 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

    You seemed confident interpreting the evidence that Keith presented last night as underwhelming. I just figured you must have a level of knowledge to come to that conclusion ?
     

    There was no evidence of anything really. Just some stuff that was out there already. It certainly doesn't point towards anything. 

  10. 30 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

    Keith has released two of his pieces of ‘evidence’ :lol: A letter from BeIN we all already knew about, which said they don’t like KSA.

    The second piece, a letter from Masters that refers to PIF as ‘a company in Saudi Arabia’. Wew. That’ll be that sorted then. Other than the fact it’s factually correct and not inferring ownership.

    Oh, Richard Key’s deleted tweets are apparently important too, somehow. 

    I hope he’s got some fantastic pieces held back and this isn’t a sign of the quality of evidence he/the club apparently has.

    No way? That was it? :lol:

×
×
  • Create New...