nufcnick

Something definitely going on 

5 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Lots of noise about us breaching PSR and trying to sell anything that isn't nailed down, buy no actual movement. Something doesn't add up.

Absolutely agree, something really doesn’t add up, there is no way we would have waited until now to start trying to move players on, if we were that far in breach of FFP. All of theses leaks are coming from the SlyNews lackeys, it’s almost as if they are trying to unsettle our players, the Gordon one makes no sense as that would have been all over the local Liverpool journalists before slynews keith popped up 

3 minutes ago, STM said:

Looks like it's Brighton for 30m.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That wouldn’t annoy me as much as Everton, Brighton have history of being through players, as long as we have a sell on I’m happy with it. 

1 minute ago, SUPERTOON said:

We could have still done a bit more to raise more money.

Which is why I don’t believe that we’re that far in the hole(if any) training kit and training ground sponsorship would raise £20m+ per season 

3 minutes ago, Ben said:

Has anyone confirmed that we even need to sell

Nope 

37 minutes ago, et tu brute said:

I'm gobsmacked that there have been no leaks with the case. It's a good week at least since I've seen or heard any media stories concerning the case.

27 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Makes sense as it’s basically lawyers who wouldn’t want to risk leaking anything for obvious reasons. 

Had it gone really well for the Premier League, you would think leaks would have came out from the usual suspects, so I’m hoping the silence means it has gone badly for the sly fuckers 

1 minute ago, r0cafella said:

I think we would, it’s double what we paid after all. 
 

I feel he’s worth more to us but I can’t see us getting much more. 

Disagree, the only way we sell is if we can get an upgrade for less, and there aren’t any upgrades available for less, currently. 

2 minutes ago, black_n_white said:

If the club receive an offer for say 120million do they accept?

No, because comparable players release clauses are upwards of £130m 

1 hour ago, LRD said:

Haven't they just signed a player for 18.5m?

That would only amount to about £300k on this years books 

20 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

No leaks either to the usual sports journo’s.

I wonder if that means it’s going poorly for the premier league 

So grounded man 

1 hour ago, STM said:

1 hour ago, Magpie said:

And yet we are!

I honestly have to admit, I always thought that if you started at home, you finished away, and vise-versa

11 minutes ago, Minhosa said:

First 3:

 

Southampton (h)

Bournemouth (a)

Spurs (h)

 

Last 3:

 

Chelsea (h)

Arsenal (a)

Everton (h).

That’s wrong and we can’t play at home on the opening day and the closing day 

57 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

It's difficult to provide any accuracy because you're having to estimate so much.

 

Clubs don't publish their FFP calculations so you just have to put together a best guess based on what is published, so even that "£2m profit required to meet PSR" could be out by a fair margin. Then the 23/24 period you don't even have that.

 

Does he have our domestic match-day income going down from 165.5 to 157.8 by the way or have I misread that?

That’s prize money, match day revenue he had as £39.1m which still looks pretty  low  

Bellingham is just different gravy man 

26 minutes ago, madras said:

"The case will be heard in private and there will be no public acknowledgment of any outcome, nor the reasons behind it"

 

Sounds reasonable. You'd never think this was an organisation desperate not to have an independent regulator imposed on it.

This is why it will end up at CAT, the the PL arbitration committee will automatically find in favour of the PL 

What time does the club shop close, is it 5 or 6, I ordered online but thinking about going down to collect instead 

7 hours ago, Slim said:

Was it subject to fair market checks ?

Only applies when property is sold under value to avoid taxes, we could sell our training ground to the Ruben’s for a £1b 

11 minutes ago, Terraloon said:

Not in PL arbitration there isn’t. 
 

There is what in effect is a contractural agreement between the league and all member clubs  that save on a point of law where there is a route to the HC all clubs have agreed to abide by the decisions/ conclusions reached under the PL Rule Book and in particular section X which deals specifically with the arbitration procedure. 
 

The very last subsection excludes the route that you suggest is open to clubs.

 

 

A rule that a “boys club” puts in place can’t supersede the Law, if it’s knocked back in arbitration”which it will be” mancity can still take it to UK court’s and challenge it as un lawful 

2 hours ago, Skeletor said:

 

No offence to Mbuemo, but Olise is the one.

No chance in a million years we’re getting anywhere near Olise 

16 minutes ago, Tsunami said:

Think his contract runs out Sept 25 so I guess we’ll take what we can and run.

All player contracts end on June 30th of that year, no matter what date the player joins.

Hahaha dirty Leeds staying exactly where they belong 

33 minutes ago, Ash said:

Not doubting your info for one minute but this is something I’ve struggled to get my head around for a while when it comes to increasing our budget. Why sell off our prized assets when we have plenty of players who aren’t good enough for where we want to progress to as a club? Now Europe isn’t a factor and we don’t need to hit a club trained quota, Longstaff should be a real consideration to be sold, for example. 

Yeah I don’t get it either, the players that we will release this summer will save us in excess of £10m a year, that’s half of what we would have made in the ECL, and the sale of a longstaff or almiron will get us the rest of the way. 

Looked like this thread can be closed 

1 hour ago, OCK said:

Did @Froggy quit the forum?

Hopefully