Jump to content

et tu brute

Member
  • Posts

    7,069
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by et tu brute

  1. Here's the fantasist's ensembles
  2. Give over will you, the Premier League accountants (top level) will be going through the accounts with a fine tooth comb. I'm quite sure us and Forest are not sharing their account information before they're submitted. You're talking absolute shite and offered nothing apart from your fantasy thinkings. You keep your imagination going though, I've got better things to do
  3. Neither, a twenty million pound transfer can't be hidden in accounts when you haven't made any other signings.!if you want to live in fantasy land go for it.
  4. No can you show me where in the accounts the fee is included? That's what the Premier league will be asking, not the made up shite you're coming up with
  5. Don't talk bollocks man the fee will be included in the accounts.
  6. So how much did we pay then? All reports state £20 million. Please show me where this is incorrect.
  7. And paid £20 million for a keeper who has played one part game and yet was bought for €4.9 million. Losing two players Howe didn't want to lose (his words) is not clever financial fiddling. It was caused by poor financial management on our side and was done to stop one of our purples going. Totally disagree, we were fucked over due to total desperation as a result of a points deduction incoming.
  8. I know that, doesn't mean they didn't fuck us over with it though. Assisted by poor mismanagement on our side
  9. Howay then knacker what's wrong with what I put
  10. Any money put in by our owners is done via club shares, so no it wouldn't count as a shareholder loan at all
  11. Bollocks to that, you don't let clubs take the piss out of you. They already got away with one last year, when selling us a non entity of a goalkeeper for £20 million after they had paid €4.9 million the year before.
  12. https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/the-geordie-mag-myth….1659507/ Revolting against their mackem tag
  13. What statement is that?
  14. Lucky for you I don't gamble and never have, otherwise I would be taking your offer up straight away. Not one of their current crop of players who were promoted are of Premier League quality, The signings they have made for a club in a position of just being promoted, is imo not the way forward. You should not be taking massive gambles. As a couple mentioned before, it's what Burnley did and look what happened then.
  15. Can't see it, be the same as last two years with the three teams going down.
  16. Fast forward to May
  17. Aye he's their village idiot
  18. I don't I've been watching the Derby since the 70s, so seen everything you can. The easiest game out of all of those was the last game. The gap in the two teams was there in every position on the pitch. Since I'm fully expecting them to struggle to beat Derby's record, I'm looking forward to the two games, as I think we will absolutely batter them (as will most teams).
  19. Those prices are pretty low prices nowadays in the Premier League League
  20. Are they actually ok though? One player who was kicked out at Roma nearly as quickly as they signed him and a player who apart from Leeds, had no other clubs interested in him.
  21. Got fuck all to do with that, it's the fact he says winning would mean twice as much and then finishes it with it's not the same feel now really
  22. How to contradict yourself in 50 words. Thick fucker 🤣🤣
×
×
  • Create New...