et tu brute

May well do (I actually think they will totally stink the place out and struggle to beat Derby's record), but you still can't make that assumption based on two games and ignore the fact they finished a massive 24 points behind them

They obviously have compared to what they paid for him. I don't think anyone stated they didn't. Me personally, I was taking into account the money they have paid out.

No fair point

They signed Le Fee for about £20 million, have to pay Birmingham 15% of the Bellingham fee, and will be paying for increased wages/bonuses to their players for promotion (Ipswich paid £16 million last year).

See my post above, they're not significantly richer on the two players sold. In fact, they're are about equal currently and two players down already

Thick racist cunt strikes again. Better in the two matches against them, what about the 46 matches over the season, when you were 24 points worse

They have a profit of nearly £5 million when you take into account the 15% sell on fee and the fee of around £20 million for Le Fee. They have also sold Watson for £11 million, so a £16 million sales profit. However, as I have said before, they will have had to pay increased wages and bonuses to players, for achieving promotion. Ipswich were reported to have paid out £16 million last season, so I would say in all probability, Sunderland will be paying out very similar to what Ipswich did. £16 million profit sales - £16 million to players = £0, so basically no money made and already two players down

No, I've said I've seen nothing apart from gobshite reporters spouting their usual clickbait. You want to believe that go for it. At the end of the day I'll wait to see who comes through the door.

Did he sign, no end of conversation. When players have deals which are official, and medicals are arranged, then I'll listen to what is reported. As you said, let's see what pans out

Have you got the emails? No, so why mention it I take no notice of what is reported, as the vast majority is just clickbait. I've said this countless times before. You're right let's see how it plays out

One of the last people I would take notice of is Downie. You want to believe that fair enough. Shows fuck all to me and we will soon see anyway.

Please show me where he put a £50 million bid in last summer.

That's this season's stats

Does he?, let's see if he signs not what Hope spouts out.

Disagree I just don't see him as a top class replacement for Murphy, which is what we need.

Is he really proven? One decent season at Forest. If you think he is worth that much fair enough. I don't and hopefully we don't find out

Not for the money being quoted it certainly isn't.

He started 32 out of 43 games, but that maybe due to injury also. Still not worth £50 million either

If it's 50 million like fuck would I sign him. Bad news day if true, first news on Wilson possible staying (unbelievable if he does) and then a player who is worth nowhere near the fee being quoted by Hope. He's a regular substitute for both Forest and Sweden. Hopefully both sets of news are wrong

Not surprised with his injury record. Absolutely stupid decision if he gets a new contract.

By the quality of signings overall and watching decisions (tactical/substitutions) made during matches. It will be interesting this season, and I would love nothing more than for her to prove me wrong.

Interesting, I've been saying for a while that I think the manager is totally out of her depth at this level.

I'm sure it was mentioned she has been offered a coaching role here, so maybe hear other news on that soon.

Probably ones with WSL teams

I'm a miserable cunt mind when it comes to any talk of players from reporters for their clickbait