et tu brute

Not when it's business related there are not

Your last four words are essential. There has to be a challenge first and there has been, so it has to apply to the legalities within British Law

It is doesn't constitute what is within British Law, then it certainly is enforceable (got fuck all to do with it being a football matter). Ziegler (Premier League mouthpiece) indicated that the verdict was quite substantial in favour of Man City). It's not a case of there would be leaks if Man City had won, as there are no leaks either that the Premier League had won. There is no news because the item covering this was pulled at the last meeting. IMO the item would not have been pulled if there was only a minor change or nothing changing. Time will tell though

Just can't see it with the cost, limitations and the fact that a mass amount of season ticket holders will be affected, resulting in a decent loss of revenue when we are already up against it with PSR rules. Also I take no notice of what that bald cunt reports

I wouldn't sign up to say one word to those inbred fuckers. I would be banned first post

Almiron every time turning back onto his left foot and longstaff just being longstaff.

Just one thing a new stadium would bring decent revenue in, is the top music artists coming to Newcastle. Something that SJP is restricted on with entry/exit into the stadium, for artists who have big stage sets.

That's the excuse they will use, not financially sound and they will be 100% correct to use that

Only sold 2,000'accorsing to the inbreds

Onviously they couldn't due to capacity, but your point more than stands up,, when there will be nearly 20,000 (actual not their shite official figure) less fans in their stadium

Daft twat doesn't even read the post made two posts before his. Thick as fuck man. They will be making every excuse going as the fewm boils over

Tomorrow night will show this exactly, third in the league and they will be lucky to have 30,000 there (obviously the official attendance will be the usual lies. Whereas, just down the road there will be a sell out for a League 2 side (not wanting to be disrespectful to Wimbledon). Attendance threads every home game, despite the proven bullshit for their official attendances. Cheap season tickets and tickets given away; as their accounts fully demonstrate with mid table revenue levels for the Championship.

What a shame it's a sellout and will have nearly 20,000 extra fans in attendance

Should be 5 or 6. Playing really well, but combination of good saves, poor misses and at times being guilty of walking the ball in. Portsmouth haven't been in our penalty area at all and not had a shot yet.

Kissed the badge for the first time in a while and was completely the opposite in effort compared to last week. The new contract looks like it has put him in a good place

Even if it was controversial (it wasn't), Joelington's should have been given also as he makes no contact with the ball and also who can forget Edison bringing down Frazer a few years ago.

The defending was absolutely shite for their goal. Trippier rushing in and Burn getting turned so easily. So frustrating as played well

Trippier and Burn ffs man

No it was just not showing anything, that's what the question mark was for, just showing as a line of numbers for me

?

Without giving details, Howe mentioned about the new training ground and stadium. What I found interesting though was that he mentioned new stadium first before stating redevelopment of St James'. Maybe nothing of course

Everyone was reporting that the outcome was supposed to be released this week, so I don't think that's the issue. Only time will tell though for sure

So has virtually everyone then including Ziegler who as stated before is the premier league's mouthpiece. I think it is very significant that the rules for discussion were pulled, that doesn't happen if it's a minor change

Anyone know how ticket sales have went?