-
Posts
4,355 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Displayname
-
I know of a place were we could accommodate Isak. The reserves.. But yeah, a deal for Isak would already have to be in place unofficially before getting both Wissa and Sesko.
-
Not if the club gave us permission.
-
I would say it costs us our reputation if our bid was accepted but the player turned us down now. Especially after what has happened already this summer.
-
I know we have bid for players before this window without having agreed terms with the player. But not a week after the initial rumours came out and everyone was reporting that it was all about having to agree terms with the player first..
-
Hey, thats what we were told he could go for.
-
I think they have with Eddie saying he didn't even know of the Isak offer before it was turned down. Don't need an official director appointed for someone in their ranks to take charge.
-
Would be a hell of a concident if this bid came in just after the most credible piece of journalism ever written came out yesterday saying he wanted us.
-
There is no denying that negiotiations for a new striker would be alot harder if people new we had(or would have) plenty of money in the bank from the sale of Isak though.
-
I think we will get both and sell Isak. Come around to thinking that the latest Liverpool bid was just an agreed play between us and them to give us a better negitiation position towards our targets and to make us not look like pushovers. Makes really no sense otherwise.
-
We have the ability if we are desperate enough. Probably won't break our wage structure, but we can give him a hefty sign on fee.
-
I really need it to be the positive one.
-
The legit one.
-
Ban please.
-
How the turn tables! Lets keep Isak as a backup to our new nr 9 just for funz.