

Tonalis Bookie
Member-
Posts
178 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Tonalis Bookie
-
everyday the amount we could ask for was reducing, the right thing has been done. Hopefully the agreement listed our main targets with an agreement from MUFC that they would not approach these for 18 months minimum
-
A nice Swedish team mate for Isak
-
When I was working in the game it was both. I left 2019
-
No player in their right mind should ever do this, you forfeit your signing on fee
-
Yes, they do
-
search dazzanufc1892, you can see my posting from 2009 if that helps. I had to delete that when the new FIFA regs came in place that are now defunct. You may like them. I know being the scenes issues, if you did, you'd see we have an elite Bielsa issue going on
-
It may be in the contract but it comes down to 'reasonableness' - on average reasonableness is about 6 months. If he made NUFC aware of his intent to leave in January. by June he could be free to go. Any compensation owed will also be limited by time passed and gardening leave conditions / reasonableness. If CAS say 2 years is too much, maybe its a year, he will have already served a number of months and we might have 4 or 5 months of finances owed then, to which out 20m is pointless. So we could lose out on all our bargaining positions for a few mil. On Ashworths part it isnt great, but it's a job end of the day. He got the chance to go to a bigger club at a great time where he isnt financially hamstrung. Without fandom most of us do it, its business sadly and MUFC have a strong position when we look at it that way also - From manchester so United is a given sadly
-
Let me lay a few points out that we need to consider and how it benefits us by doing a deal If united are smart (and they will be) they'll have applied to CAS and they will probably get their way A CAS hearing could be expedited and he be in place before the end of this window If we go to CAS and do not win, we have a precedent against us There is a significant chance we get much less than we want It may well void a number of terms we currently have We may actually end up losing out on what we could get and damage our own FFP We may not be able to hire an individual in place of DA whilst hes here If we deal we can delay a start date We can also implement terms on players that can & cannot be recruited as part of an expedited agreement We can protect information and hire a replacement quicker We can insert terms regarding any staff or other individuals that MUFC may wish to get from us We have the ability to control the situation going forward All of this so United potentially wait a few months is damaging
-
This really doesnt take into consideration any of the actual consequences, intricacies of player movement or issues we could encounter by not doing a deal. Believe me, we should deal
-
FWIW, a deal suits us more than united, some of the comments here are vitriolic to the point they would rather us damage the club than do a deal.
-
official club site
-
Thanks for this! saved me another fiver. Ended up with home shirt, away shirt and pink goalkeeper shorts
-
This and wondering if it’s true to size / clingy. Will be getting home and away once I know
-
The manager chose to show the team we were quitting with 15 minutes to go, that cant be acceptable
-
Chelsea 3-2 Newcastle United (11/03/24) | Reaction: pg 45
Tonalis Bookie replied to BlueStar's topic in Football
Asking not to give up on the 80th minute isnt expecting top 4 or 6 -
The things at play here arent a rush of blood to the head. I don't think he will be here first game next year regardless of what happens from now because of a few very important moments that add up. Its not knee jerk, so just a few points: Our defence has been on a rapid decline since around February last season when the brilliant streak of not conceding ended. It has steadily declined to a point now where most attacks lead to a chance or an effort at goal Our lack of ability to change into new systems to deal with both in game situations and pre game tactical issues is startling An example of refusing to make subs to impact a game is being shown every game. Please remember Wolves away when we wre struggling, trippier was having a mare and Eddie did nothing We are playing player who haven't trained or who are struggling with niggles. If you want a prime example, in the Carabao against Chelsea we sent an injured gordon out after HT and allowed him to play on for about 10 minutes which furthered his issues Despite players coming back and being 3 goals up we do not make subs to bring on players, even a Ritchie to see out 10 relatively easy minutes It's very much a Bielsa moment for us at the moment. Eddie did an amazing job but the injuries we receive are muscle based, exactly what was happening at Leeds when players were playing in the red. If you look at the above and some of the other instances people will raise then it isnt just a snap reaction, its the acceptance of a large list of instances and decided we do not think they will improve over the coming months and into the new season
-
or we have a lot more of a clue about a number of things......
-
you'll be a pariah if you do, sadly.
-
happy to satisfy the masses - Dazzanufc1892
-
I think if he did here what he did there we would be delighted. A poor squad finished second and won a European trophy. We need to elevate ourselves and we can't just simply buy our way there. He gets trophies and we are starved of one. Quite often one opens the floodgates and hes a name who will attract players. He wouldn't be blocking certain elements in the club nor flying teams out late for European games due to his own arrogance
-
Nope, been a member on here since 2008. Had to delete my old one about 3 months ago due to the new FIFA regs! Sifu will confirm ive been saying this since summer