Guest Scorpius Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Friggin Smith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Kicking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Butt looked stoned tonight. There was one point where the ball was passed to him where he was stood still and literally did not move. Needless to say, the ball was robbed. It was bloody pathetic. I saw that. Thought he must be ill or something. Looked fucked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Butt looked stoned tonight. There was one point where the ball was passed to him where he was stood still and literally did not move. Needless to say, the ball was robbed. It was bloody pathetic. I was told by the barman "you're in an over-16s bar, so act like one" haf a minute or so following that. Wasn't really the right place for me to watch a footy match in fairness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebellious Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Picked pattison but Ameobi was our poorest tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Butt looked stoned tonight. There was one point where the ball was passed to him where he was stood still and literally did not move. Needless to say, the ball was robbed. It was bloody pathetic. I was told by the barman "you're in an over-16s bar, so act like one" haf a minute or so following that. Wasn't really the right place for me to watch a footy match in fairness. I felt like crying too mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny_nufc Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Smith, I had my doubts when we signed him but decided to give him a chance.... but jesus christ, everything I thought about him is being reinforced, and then some. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FlapjackJoe Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 I agree with previous posters, Smith has been awful so far. A poor man's Scott Parker, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Smith isn't in the poll because I started it before tonight's match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 We may have been shite tonight, but I still can't believe anyone wouldn't vote for Pattison. He may not be the one you hate the most, but he's the worst by a fucking mile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 A poor man's Scott Parker, tbh. No way, such a harsh comment. It's not his position (midfield) what were people expecting him to do against a Derby brick wall who were playing very well in fairness. he's not the type of player who will create something in a tight pocket, he's a striker being played out of position. For him to be mentioned in this thread is harsh imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 A poor man's Scott Parker, tbh. No way, such a harsh comment. It's not his position (midfield) what were people expecting him to do against a Derby brick wall who were playing very well in fairness. he's not the type of player who will create something in a tight pocket, he's a striker being played out of position. For him to be mentioned in this thread is harsh imo. Aye. Harsh on Parker, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 It is like asking: What do you prefer: Dog shit, horse shit, cat shit, elephant shit or rabbit shit? It doesn't matter at the end of the day, picking one above the other regardless of how big the shit is because you have still ended up with shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 It is like asking: What do you prefer: Dog shit, horse shit, cat shit, elephant shit or rabbit shit? It doesn't matter at the end of the day, picking one above the other regardless of how big the shit is because you have still ended up with shit. No shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Jerusalem Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 if ameobi wasnt a geordie he'd be nowhere near the squad. Quoted for truth - if he was put up for transfer how many of the teams in this league would make a move for him. Lightweight donkey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 It is like asking: What do you prefer: Dog shit, horse shit, cat shit, elephant shit or rabbit shit? It doesn't matter at the end of the day, picking one above the other regardless of how big the shit is because you have still ended up with shit. And if you don't let this dick fuck this asshole... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 It is like asking: What do you prefer: Dog shit, horse shit, cat shit, elephant shit or rabbit shit? It doesn't matter at the end of the day, picking one above the other regardless of how big the shit is because you have still ended up with shit. And if you don't let this dick fuck this asshole... Keep your mucky fantasies in GC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 And if you don't let this dick f*** this asshole... Wrong forum Yorkie!!! Your not on Gaydar now mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Only fans of Team America would get that. And it's one of my jokes, so even then it would be pushing it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Only fans of Team America would get that. And it's one of my jokes, so even then it would be pushing it. I got it. You're still Graeme Le Saux. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steven_MB Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Ameobi, because you can get away with poor full backs with quality centrebacks, but there isn't anyone who can cover for ameobi when he gets the ball, not worst individually but worst for the team as a whole. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Only fans of Team America would get that. I bought that on DVD months ago, never watched it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Ameobi, because you can get away with poor full backs with quality centrebacks, but there isn't anyone who can cover for ameobi when he gets the ball, not worst individually but worst for the team as a whole. Shola wasn't the reason we lost today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steven_MB Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Ameobi, because you can get away with poor full backs with quality centrebacks, but there isn't anyone who can cover for ameobi when he gets the ball, not worst individually but worst for the team as a whole. Shola wasn't the reason we lost today. are you saying that playing Martins instead of Ameobi would've made no difference, like if Martins had some of shola's chance, and martins can score goals without much help, while ameobi, needs it practically to bounce of him into the net. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Ameobi, because you can get away with poor full backs with quality centrebacks, but there isn't anyone who can cover for ameobi when he gets the ball, not worst individually but worst for the team as a whole. Shola wasn't the reason we lost today. are you saying that playing Martins instead of Ameobi would've made no difference, like if Martins had some of shola's chance, and martins can score goals without much help, while ameobi, needs it practically to bounce of him into the net. Possibly, but probably not. Martins can create a goal out of nothing, but when he doesn't score he does just as little as Ameobi in terms of influencing a game. We lost the game in midfield and tactically. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now