Guest Invicta_Toon Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 bluesigh.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Not interested is he? Anyone who was interested wouldnt keep churning out the shite he does,his body language sucks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DazzaNufc1892 Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 you cant be shit if you have never had a run, when he did, he scored, simple Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 you cant be shit if you have never had a run, when he did, he scored, simple Uh,ok. *scratches head* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Another reason why the club are taking the piss. Just play Luque ffs. Ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 you cant be shit if you have never had a run, when he did, he scored, simple shola scores sometimes tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 you cant be shit if you have never had a run, when he did, he scored, simple shola scores sometimes tbh What he said ^^ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 we may as well give him a decent chance again, seen as no fucker else is scoring either. And with our best striker taken off injured today, we're right in the shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 you cant be shit if you have never had a run, when he did, he scored, simple shola scores sometimes tbh As if all there is to it is scoring the odd goal. Get some perspective. :roll: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think it's personal - a bit like Souness' problems with everyone but Shearer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think it's more to do with the fact when he plays he looks like he's not bothered, doesn't run about, doesn't try to get into decent postitions, can't take on his man and overall shows himself to be yet another massive waste of money. He's had his chances he was crap simple as. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think it's more to do with the fact when he plays he looks like he's not bothered, doesn't run about, doesn't try to get into decent postitions, can't take on his man and overall shows himself to be yet another massive waste of money. He's had his chances he was crap simple as. So basically no difference between him and Shola other than one cost £9.5m? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ChickenKiev Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Anybody is better than Shola.......Give Luque another chance, surely can't be worse than it is now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think it's more to do with the fact when he plays he looks like he's not bothered, doesn't run about, doesn't try to get into decent postitions, can't take on his man and overall shows himself to be yet another massive waste of money. He's had his chances he was crap simple as. So basically no difference between him and Shola other than one cost £9.5m? Exactly, though Shola does manage the odd fluke goal. First time in a very long time I've seen St James Park worried about a penalty when Shola stepped up to take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think it's more to do with the fact when he plays he looks like he's not bothered, doesn't run about, doesn't try to get into decent postitions, can't take on his man and overall shows himself to be yet another massive waste of money. He's had his chances he was crap simple as. So basically no difference between him and Shola other than one cost £9.5m? Exactly, though Shola does manage the odd fluke goal. First time in a very long time I've seen St James Park worried about a penalty when Shola stepped up to take it. Shola manages the odd fluke goal because he's actually on the pitch long enough for law of averages to kick in. There's no evidence to suggest that Luque wouldn't fluke more goals than Shola if given the same chances. I'd actually fully expect him to score more if they both played the same amount of minutes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocho Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think the title is a bit misleading. It wasn't MOTD, but it was Gavin Peacock's opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think the title is a bit misleading. It wasn't MOTD, but it was Gavin Peacock's opinion. who is a commentator on MOTD :roll: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think the title is a bit misleading. It wasn't MOTD, but it was Gavin Peacock's opinion. Aye it sure was mate He did nto even go into any detail for his opinion. just said "Luque a nine and a half million pound waste of money" then moved on. Does it really deserve a thread of its own ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Shola manages the odd fluke goal because he's actually on the pitch long enough for law of averages to kick in. There's no evidence to suggest that Luque wouldn't fluke more goals than Shola if given the same chances. I'd actually fully expect him to score more if they both played the same amount of minutes. You seem to miss the point, I'd rather have someone on the pitch who's any good than someone who scores fluke goals. The fact is when Luque has played he has not played well enough for the manager to say, I can't leave him out. Sibierski has even done better than bloody Luque and he was free. Luque is not good enough to play in the Premiership, his football is not suited to the league he should go back to Spain where he can perform again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I think the title is a bit misleading. It wasn't MOTD, but it was Gavin Peacock's opinion. Rest of the panel didn't exactly disagree. In fact I can't find many people who disagree just the handful on here who try to stick up for him despite his terrible performances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Shola manages the odd fluke goal because he's actually on the pitch long enough for law of averages to kick in. There's no evidence to suggest that Luque wouldn't fluke more goals than Shola if given the same chances. I'd actually fully expect him to score more if they both played the same amount of minutes. You seem to miss the point, I'd rather have someone on the pitch who's any good than someone who scores fluke goals. The fact is when Luque has played he has not played well enough for the manager to say, I can't leave him out. Sibierski has even done better than bloody Luque and he was free. Luque is not good enough to play in the Premiership, his football is not suited to the league he should go back to Spain where he can perform again. Luis Garcia was a spanish misfit when he joined too. However, Liverpool were open minded and educated enough to keep faith and made a player out of him. Do you think if he got relegated to the reserves that he would have made any progress in adapting to english football? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest js Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 another fine example of souness's keen eye for a transfer. :roll: i've always shoted for him to be sold even if it's for half what we paid for. i recall some people still thinking we should let him gor 8m. yeah righto. we'd be lucky to get him off our wage bill for 3m. he was really a pointless buy, and looks very lost at the mo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Luis Garcia was a spanish misfit when he joined too. However, Liverpool were open minded and educated enough to keep faith and made a player out of him. Do you think if he got relegated to the reserves that he would have made any progress in adapting to english football? But they were quick to get shot of Fernando Morientes when they realised he wasn't up to the task. Can you imagine how pissed off you would be if you went into work and they said, oh we've brough someone else in to do your job he's not very good yet but you never know he might come good soon. Bollocks to that I'd be a tad pissed off knowing I was being kept out of the side by someone who was performing like Luque. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Luis Garcia was a spanish misfit when he joined too. However, Liverpool were open minded and educated enough to keep faith and made a player out of him. Do you think if he got relegated to the reserves that he would have made any progress in adapting to english football? But they were quick to get shot of Fernando Morientes when they realised he wasn't up to the task. Can you imagine how pissed off you would be if you went into work and they said, oh we've brough someone else in to do your job he's not very good yet but you never know he might come good soon. Bollocks to that I'd be a tad pissed off knowing I was being kept out of the side by someone who was performing like Luque. Erm who exactly would he be keeping out? Shola!? Morientes was given every opportunity at Liverpool. He wasn't thrown into the reserves after only a handful of poor performances. When it appeared that he wasn't adapting they handled it so that another team could make use of him and get some money back on him. Sticking him in the reserves achieves NOTHING at all. On the pitch currently we are achieving NOTHING AT ALL. What have we got to lose by giving him an actual RUN of games? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now