Guest SLK Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 I think one of Roeder's cons is that he does tend to leave substitutions late a bit mostly towards the last few minutes of the game which really do not add any value to the team except time wasting and I don't think we have been winning games to be that generous with time wasting... I really don't understand why Roeder can't make early substitutions around the 70th minute to give the player(s) coming in some reasonable time to make an impact on the game and change the scoreline...I do think we miss Bobby's triple substitution at the 70th minute mark which really helped most of the time to cause an impact on the game especially when you are bringing three players at the same time which is nearly quarter of the team changed in one go... So do you think that Roeder needs to change things a bit earlier when we seem to be doing nothing and looking lost and run out of ideas...For me is to bring back "Bobby's Triple Subs on the 70th minute"... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 I miss the triple sub. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 He does them because he's an idiot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 In general his subs do need to be better so that we can be more effective, but last night I assume he brought Carroll on simply to waste a bit of time! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 i think the triple sub bobby did was the most annoyin thing in the world, complete panic move, and it was more like the 75th minute wen he made the subs which i dont think is long enough! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 At 0-0 or behind in a game then I don't understand only giving a sub 10 mins or so, but winning late on making subs help run the clock down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 He was never gonna change anything last night while it was 1-0... But in the Premier League it is very frustrating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Emre05 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 I was hoping last Saturday against Charlton that he would make a substitution in or around the 65/70 min mark.. It was obvious we werent going to score in the 2nd half and he left Luque on the bench. Same against Middlesboro the week before.. Yakubu scores with 5 mins to go THEN Glenn decides to change things. It is frustrating alright Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 He does them because he's an idiot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago_shearer Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 i think the triple sub bobby did was the most annoyin thing in the world, complete panic move, and it was more like the 75th minute wen he made the subs which i dont think is long enough! I agree with that. I hated the triple sub. But I don't like the 10 min desperation subs by Roeder either. Common sense would say that the best time is around the hour mark - give players a time to have some impact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Imperio Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Players have to be given time to blood into the game, it's very difficult coming off the bench and getting a feel for the game in 10 minutes or so. Ideal time is around the 65th-70th minute. Then they have quite a lot of time to have some kind of impact on the result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate End Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 i think the triple sub bobby did was the most annoyin thing in the world, complete panic move Yeah never worked for us... comeback kings i recall... awfull really annoyin i mean annoying blueconfused.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 2 subs around the 65-70 minute mark. Third sub for back up just in case..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Guus Hiddink is the master of substitutions. In the world cup australia were 1-0 down to japan after dominating the game, where he took off two defenders and put on two strikers (josh kennedy & John Aloisi) it worked and australia won 3-1. NOw thats a tactical substitution Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 I miss the triple sub. Haha, that was a Bobby classic from 2000-1 season. The amount of times he threw on Glass, Cordone & Lua-Lua together. Remember one game at home to Man U where he brought the 3 on, then within about 5 minutes Cordone pulled it back, Lua-Lua sliced it across goal, and Glass scored to equalise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now