Rob W Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 It's coming on again............. 1961 1978 1989 another bunch of no-hoppers heading down the tubes again any player of skill sold and a bunch of old has beens who are so injured they can't even make the starting whistle I feel genuinely ill :suicide: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 even worth a reply..? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 in before the lock by the way rob, any correlation between the dates? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steggy Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 in before the lock by the way rob, any correlation between the dates? Years we were previously relegated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 in before the lock by the way rob, any correlation between the dates? Dates years we were previously relegated. I thought they were his last posts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 in before the lock by the way rob, any correlation between the dates? Dates years we were previously relegated. I thought they were his last baths. FYP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 +1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Would make me sick to the stomach if Shearer was the man to take us down. I know it wouldn't be his fault really unless he makes some monumental cock-ups with tactics etc but with it not being his team for him to be the man in charge if we're confirmed to relegation would be shite. Surely can't happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Well, it could equally be 1992. Sometimes the darkest hour is just before the dawn. Early days, but I've been very impressed with Shearer so far - and anyone who knows me would know I've not been his biggest fan in the past. It wasn't a great performance on Saturday, but the focus was there. There were no histrionics from Shearer - he projected a calm confidence which hopefully will rub off on the side. I particularly liked the fact that, despite the fact that it looked like we had a good goal disallowed, there was no ranting and raving about the ref. That's the right attitude - it was a mistake, it's over, we move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I particularly liked the fact that, despite the fact that it looked like we had a good goal disallowed, there was no ranting and raving about the ref. That's the right attitude - it was a mistake, it's over, we move on. Absolutely spot on. Kinnear would have got himself another day at Soho Square over that one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Well, it could equally be 1992. Sometimes the darkest hour is just before the dawn. Early days, but I've been very impressed with Shearer so far - and anyone who knows me would know I've not been his biggest fan in the past. It wasn't a great performance on Saturday, but the focus was there. There were no histrionics from Shearer - he projected a calm confidence which hopefully will rub off on the side. I particularly liked the fact that, despite the fact that it looked like we had a good goal disallowed, there was no ranting and raving about the ref. That's the right attitude - it was a mistake, it's over, we move on. It couldn't be 1992 - KK was appointed in FEBRUARY, not April...he was also able to buy 2 players who were instrumental in preventing relegation. Shearer does not have either the luxury of 2 extra months(and extra games) or the ability to make crucial buys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Well, it could equally be 1992. Sometimes the darkest hour is just before the dawn. Early days, but I've been very impressed with Shearer so far - and anyone who knows me would know I've not been his biggest fan in the past. It wasn't a great performance on Saturday, but the focus was there. There were no histrionics from Shearer - he projected a calm confidence which hopefully will rub off on the side. I particularly liked the fact that, despite the fact that it looked like we had a good goal disallowed, there was no ranting and raving about the ref. That's the right attitude - it was a mistake, it's over, we move on. It couldn't be 1992 - KK was appointed in FEBRUARY, not April...he was also able to buy 2 players who were instrumental in preventing relegation. Shearer does not have either the luxury of 2 extra months(and extra games) or the ability to make crucial buys. Well....yeeahh..... but you know what I mean. What might feel like rock bottom can be the springboard for success. Despite the fact that Keegan took over a bit earlier in 1992, my memory is that the team was looking far worse and relegation looked like a certainty rather than a possibility. We had just lost 5-2 to Oxford and 4-0 to Southend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 "springboard for success" what success? we've won nowt since the Fairs Cup Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 "springboard for success" what success? we've won nowt since the Fairs Cup so you wouldnt class the keegan period (mark 1) as successfull?? i certainly would! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 I don't really understand this "selling anyone with any talent as soon as an offer comes in". We were mugged over Given but Milner was "shit" and sold for double even triple what some would have accepted. N'Zogbia was a stroppy cunt who has been whinging about a move for the majority of his time here. He was also sold for a good price given all the issues. I suppose I am being naive but that, for me at least isn't evidence of us flogging off whoever we can get a good price for. If we sell Bassong in the summer as soon as someone comes knocking I will start to worry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Well, it could equally be 1992. Sometimes the darkest hour is just before the dawn. Early days, but I've been very impressed with Shearer so far - and anyone who knows me would know I've not been his biggest fan in the past. It wasn't a great performance on Saturday, but the focus was there. There were no histrionics from Shearer - he projected a calm confidence which hopefully will rub off on the side. I particularly liked the fact that, despite the fact that it looked like we had a good goal disallowed, there was no ranting and raving about the ref. That's the right attitude - it was a mistake, it's over, we move on. It couldn't be 1992 - KK was appointed in FEBRUARY, not April...he was also able to buy 2 players who were instrumental in preventing relegation. Shearer does not have either the luxury of 2 extra months(and extra games) or the ability to make crucial buys. Well....yeeahh..... but you know what I mean. What might feel like rock bottom can be the springboard for success. Despite the fact that Keegan took over a bit earlier in 1992, my memory is that the team was looking far worse and relegation looked like a certainty rather than a possibility. We had just lost 5-2 to Oxford and 4-0 to Southend. We were in a bad way when KK took over, but the set-up was totally different ; we had a few talented young players(Watson, Clark & Elliott)who wanted the club to survive, we had two potentially good forwards in Kelly(who proved his worth over 2 seasons)and Peacock...KK knew we needed a decent stopper with experience, and he got it in Kilcline ; he knew Brock was a weakness, so he got Sheedy in to replace him. You could see the difference from the very first game against Bristol City - Peacock and Kelly caused them all sorts of trouble and the team looked up for it.... Although Shearer had a much tougher baptism against Chelsea, there is no way that the team were THAT much different than they had been before ; there are TOO MANY weaknesses all round. Lose at Stoke and it will take a miracle to survive unless the Mackems collapse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now