Dave Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 In the meantime: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/fa-cup/video Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Is Manish not presenting the FA Cup or is it Dan "gimp and I'm a golf wanker" Walker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Jenas and Phil Neville, punditry falls to another low. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Waterloo? On the 100th Anniversary of WWI? Probably not the best choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybe_next_year Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Jenas and Phil Neville, punditry falls to another low. they were never the most exciting players, I'm impressed they've both managed to get more boring after retirement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this shite? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 That's ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before Same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before same here, honestly sounds like they made it up to bail englands joe hart out of trouble Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! So why wasn't a in-direct free kick offered then? Seems to me a rule that favours only the kick taker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! I would have assumed the first touch would have been the actual kick. Granted, you don't often/never see people take a free kick in two touches, but I didn't know it wasn't allowed. Even if that rule actually exists, surely that was a foul by Hart so how it bailed him out in the end and he got to retake it I will never know.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! So why wasn't a in-direct free kick offered then? Seems to me a rule that favours only the kick taker. when it's taken from inside the penalty area, the ball isn't "live" until it leaves the penalty area. Since Hart fucked it up inside, it was just a retake. Anywhere else on the field or if his 2nd touch had been outside the box it would have been an IFK to QPR. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! So why wasn't a in-direct free kick offered then? Seems to me a rule that favours only the kick taker. when it's taken from inside the penalty area, the ball isn't "live" until it leaves the penalty area. Since Hart fucked it up inside, it was just a retake. Anywhere else on the field and it would have been, or if his 2nd touch had been outside the box. load of bullshit tbh he fucked up he shouldn't get a get out of jail free card Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! So why wasn't a in-direct free kick offered then? Seems to me a rule that favours only the kick taker. when it's taken from inside the penalty area, the ball isn't "live" until it leaves the penalty area. Since Hart fucked it up inside, it was just a retake. Anywhere else on the field and it would have been, or if his 2nd touch had been outside the box. This is true, but why are goalkeepers allowed to pass to defenders in the box the last 2 seasons unlike before though, surely it's then a normal set-piece then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Ref didn't get it spot on, did he? Should have been a free kick to QPR surely? Edit: fuck that rule man! Madness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Law 13 sounds a complete utter shambles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Double kick rule, what is this s****? I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! So why wasn't a in-direct free kick offered then? Seems to me a rule that favours only the kick taker. when it's taken from inside the penalty area, the ball isn't "live" until it leaves the penalty area. Since Hart fucked it up inside, it was just a retake. Anywhere else on the field and it would have been, or if his 2nd touch had been outside the box. load of bullshit tbh he fucked up he shouldn't get a get out of jail free card Sorry I'm quoting the wrong law http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf page 42 If, when a free kick is taken by the defending team from inside its own penalty area, the ball is not kicked directly out of the penalty area: • the kick is retaken Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Ref didn't get it spot on, did he? Should have been a free kick to QPR surely? apparently he did get it spot on according to laws of the game. Still say its bullshit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 So what is a referee going to do if a goalkeeper or free kick taker just keeps on touching it twice before it leaves the penalty area to waste time, seeing as it's not a foul apparently? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Holy fuck, that headshot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 :lol: BAM! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 So what is a referee going to do if a goalkeeper or free kick taker just keeps on touching it twice before it leaves the penalty area to waste time, seeing as it's not a foul apparently? suppose he could get him on unsportsmanlike behavior if it happened more than once. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 That law is a shambles, no way should GK's be allowed to get away with it, they get away with almost everything else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts