Theregulars Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Da ba dee da ba fucking die until i die. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Up to 20 confirmed now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Up to 20 confirmed now. Decisions decisions... Push for 3x7 or 2x7 +3 subs. Good effort by people Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 8 a side was fine last time. But yeah three teams would be great. Have we got the pitch for two hours? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 8 a side was fine last time. But yeah three teams would be great. Have we got the pitch for two hours? Yes it's booked between 10-12. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Maybe we should do a poll re the format? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 8 a side was fine last time. But yeah three teams would be great. Have we got the pitch for two hours? You could say fine but wasn't great. It was a bit frantic until last 20mins when people tired. I vote 7+3 with 50 mins a half, 20 min HT, 11mins on the bench each as guessing 2 keepers get the full game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 8 a side was fine last time. But yeah three teams would be great. Have we got the pitch for two hours? You could say fine but wasn't great. It was a bit frantic until last 20mins when people tired. I vote 7+3 with 50 mins a half, 20 min HT, 11mins on the bench each as guessing 2 keepers get the full game. We've got 3 people still waiting to confirm, if they confirm then it'll need to be 3 sides. Even 3 subs is far too many. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Subs is a nightmare because no one wants to come off and there's no one to govern the changes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I can drop out if it's getting crowded... expensive to get back anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Subs is a nightmare because no one wants to come off and there's no one to govern the changes. It's piss easy. Jill just shouts every 11mins The speed of the game and booking 2 slots will leave most needing a break unless everyone has improved their fitness since the last game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Subs is a nightmare because no one wants to come off and there's no one to govern the changes. It's piss easy. Jill just shouts every 11mins The speed of the game and booking 2 slots will leave most needing a break unless everyone has improved their fitness since the last game It'll be a nightmare, it was last time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Subs is a nightmare because no one wants to come off and there's no one to govern the changes. It's p*ss easy. Jill just shouts every 11mins The speed of the game and booking 2 slots will leave most needing a break unless everyone has improved their fitness since the last game It'll be a nightmare, it was last time. Well put it to a vote. I'd personally rather not play for 11 mins (even less if you reduce the HT break from 20mins) than 35-40mins which will be the case if 3 teams. There were absolutely no problems or nightmares last time either Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Subs is a nightmare because no one wants to come off and there's no one to govern the changes. It's p*ss easy. Jill just shouts every 11mins The speed of the game and booking 2 slots will leave most needing a break unless everyone has improved their fitness since the last game It'll be a nightmare, it was last time. Well put it to a vote. I'd personally rather not play for 11 mins (even less if you reduce the HT break from 20mins) than 35-40mins which will be the case if 3 teams. If you have 3 teams, you're not having to play most of the time + there will be breaks in between the games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Subs is a nightmare because no one wants to come off and there's no one to govern the changes. It's p*ss easy. Jill just shouts every 11mins The speed of the game and booking 2 slots will leave most needing a break unless everyone has improved their fitness since the last game It'll be a nightmare, it was last time. Well put it to a vote. I'd personally rather not play for 11 mins (even less if you reduce the HT break from 20mins) than 35-40mins which will be the case if 3 teams. If you have 3 teams, you're not having to play most of the time + there will be breaks in between the games. Which is what no one wants judging by the comments even you with your 3 subs too many comment Put it to a vote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Subs is a nightmare because no one wants to come off and there's no one to govern the changes. It's p*ss easy. Jill just shouts every 11mins The speed of the game and booking 2 slots will leave most needing a break unless everyone has improved their fitness since the last game It'll be a nightmare, it was last time. Well put it to a vote. I'd personally rather not play for 11 mins (even less if you reduce the HT break from 20mins) than 35-40mins which will be the case if 3 teams. If you have 3 teams, you're not having to play most of the time + there will be breaks in between the games. Which is what no one wants judging by the comments even you with your 3 subs too many comment Put it to a vote. If we have anything above 21 players them it has to be 3 sides. Image a team with 4 subs ffs, I'd rather cancel the whole thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 You'd never make it in man magement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I'm wiv Neezy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I'm wiv Neezy. Which is what to clarify? 2 teams of 8 with subs or 3 teams of 7? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Personally I thought it was a little crowded last time round, but I'd abstain from any vote as I'm really not bothered what we do, happy to go with the majority either way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDT Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Yeah I would agree about it being crowded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Good to hear I wasn't the only one who thought that it was crowded. Not bothered either way as the occasion is more important. If people want the best quality game and the maximum playing time possible you go with my option. If you want loads of rest or don't mind standing round until the last game is finished and you are all happy to take your turn in goal as we only have 2 keepers then vote for the other option Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I'm so convinced by your not-botheredness. If people are definitely going to play ball when it comes to the subs, I'm up for Option A. I'd forgotten about the lack of a third keeper tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 The more I think about it the more I'd prefer the subs option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I'm so convinced by your not-botheredness. If people are definitely going to play ball when it comes to the subs, I'm up for Option A. I'd forgotten about the lack of a third keeper tbf. I'm not as I'd obviously have to be on one of the sides with the GK's whearas you and Neesy would gallantly take turns in goal for the team without a GK The main thing is people turn up early and bring their money in change and have a good game & laugh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now