Víctor Muñoz: "Newcastle confident of sealing deal" (Romano) / "player happy with salary, fee still to be agreed with Osasuna" (Ryder)

[r0cafella]

2 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

To me it does, if you own half a cart and I own half then it's owned by more then one person or multiple people, hence multi owners. But I'm no expert on this.

I think the terminology is a bit muddled here, multiclub ownership refers to a structure of one party owning multi clubs. 

 

In the Munoz situation, in order to buy him at the prices Osasuna did they've had to make a number of compromises including 50% of the next sale. One of the reasons why this isn't multiple owners is because Osasuna are free to negotiate with us for a % of the next sale and unless they really hate themselves that full fee would belong to them. 

[SteV]

Some ‘La Liga expert’ giving his views on him to Radio Newcastle:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0nrltlx?partner=uk.co.bbc&origin=share-mobile

[GeordieDazzler]

4 minutes ago, SteV said:

Some ‘La Liga expert’ giving his views on him to Radio Newcastle:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0nrltlx?partner=uk.co.bbc&origin=share-mobile

Better than that Smoggie bloke they spoke to about Isak. Made him sound like the second coming of Ameobi

[GeordieDazzler]

Like the work rate comments mind, sounds like Tonali on the wing. 
 

I expect those productivity stats to jump up when he’s not playing in a poor Osasuna side. 
 

 

[mayubeproud]

10 hours ago, KaKa said:

https://as.com/futbol/primera/el-newcastle-aprieta-por-victor-munoz-f202606-n/

 

Víctor Muñoz and Newcastle are close to joining. The deal is in the works and could be finalized soon. The Magpies , having received €80 million for Anthony Gordon, are prepared to invest almost half that amount. As reported by El Chiringuito and confirmed by AS, the transfer fee being considered is €35 million plus another €5 million in add-ons. This is the same €40 million buyout clause as Osasuna, but structured differently. This new arrangement also allows for a more favorable tax treatment, as simply paying the clause directly is less advantageous. However, all of this is contingent on Real Madrid's decision.

 

Because it's important to remember that this is a four-way equation: Osasuna, Newcastle, Víctor Muñoz, and Real Madrid. Real Madrid owns 50% of the player's rights after selling him for €5 million last summer. They also retain a right of first refusal and the option to exercise a buy-back clause for between €8 and €10 million this summer. Therefore, if an agreement between the English club and Real Madrid's offices at El Sadar (the stadium), as well as the player himself, were to materialize— details of which are still pending —it would also have to be reviewed by Real Madrid and subject to their decision-making power. For Real Madrid, however, it would represent a significant financial boost. Specifically, a potential €20 million (€17.5 million guaranteed and €2.5 million in performance-related bonuses).

In case if RM is okay with the transfer at this price, I wonder why they won't buy back Munoz? Let's say it costs them €10m to buy back, and then sell him at the rumored €35+5m to us immediately, then they would get a profit of €25+5m instead of €17.5+2.5m.

[healthyaddiction]

1 minute ago, mayubeproud said:

In case if RM is okay with the transfer at this price, I wonder why they won't buy back Munoz? Let's say it costs them €10m to buy back, and then sell him at the rumored €35+5m to us immediately, then they would get a profit of €25+5m instead of €17.5+2.5m.

Two lots of signing on/loyalty fees plus agent fees would probably more than make up for that.

 

Plus I'm not even sure you can sign and sell a player in the same window.

 

 

Edited 29 minutes ago by healthyaddiction

[r0cafella]

Just now, mayubeproud said:

In case if RM is okay with the transfer at this price, I wonder why they won't buy back Munoz? Let's say it costs them €10m to buy back, and then sell him at the rumored €35+5m to us immediately, then they would get a profit of €25+5m instead of €17.5+2.5m.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the tree? 

 

It will cause the sale to be delayed and imagine if he did his ACL ?

[The College Dropout]

1 minute ago, mayubeproud said:

In case if RM is okay with the transfer at this price, I wonder why they won't buy back Munoz? Let's say it costs them €10m to buy back, and then sell him at the rumored €35+5m to us immediately, then they would get a profit of €25+5m instead of €17.5+2.5m.

Pretty sure they’ll need to keep him for a season. They can’t get him and sell him in the same window.  
 

They’ve never done it with all of their buy back clauses.  

[The College Dropout]

Also if Osasuna paid €5m for him that’s profit for the player too. 
 

Youre talking €2.5m overall profit for the player . Then bonuses, sign on fees, agent costs etc.