Guest johnson293 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 While change has to start at the top, that ain't gonna happen until a takeover. Theres a lot of opinions both ways on whether Glenn Roeder is right for the job at Newcastle, or whether it's for a change. So, what is to be, Roeder to stay as manager, or Roeder to be relieved of his duties? There's only one way to find out...... "POLL!!!!" My opinion - time for change, becasue if Shepherd doesn't do it now, it'll happen in September, with another season down the drain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Finally! An original thread! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smoggeordie Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Fucks sake man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Genius idea for a thread! Genius! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 And there was me thinking it might have been a waste of time!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Luque Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I havnt seen a thread like this in... in...in 5 minutes!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smoggeordie Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I havnt seen a thread like this in... in...in 5 minutes!!! Luque should start in the first team! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Knightrider Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I voted the 5th option... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Sorry, I must have missed the other Poll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macbeth Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 It was worse 30 years ago © NE5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Sorry, I must have missed the other Poll. You mean the one that's right infront of you when you log onto the site? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I would only want Roeder gone if a decent manager was 100% linned up first, but can you really see Fred doing it that way ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 So who voted this? "No, he's been unlucky with injuries and needs more time." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Mongo Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Sacking managers all the time does no good. I've seen worse managers than Roeder do acceptably well, albeit on a lower level (it's not like the premiership is filled with managerial genius anyway), through long term stability. There's absolutely no point in sacking him if we can't get someone a lot better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I voted release Roeder but only if another manager who is actually decent can take over There is no point sacking Roeder and then with no idea to start looking for someone But of course our chairman dont think the same way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesD Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Sacking managers all the time does no good. I've seen worse managers than Roeder do acceptably well, albeit on a lower level (it's not like the premiership is filled with managerial genius anyway), through long term stability. There's absolutely no point in sacking him if we can't get someone a lot better. my sentiments exactly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemmy Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 I voted release Roeder but only if another manager who is actually decent can take over There is no point sacking Roeder and then with no idea to start looking for someone But of course our chairman dont think the same way Agree. This is the only way we should replace Roeder. The farce of the last two appointments is testament to that.to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jonny4Toon Posted April 23, 2007 Share Posted April 23, 2007 Roeder cannot make the big decisions!!! He insists on playing CARR, BABAYARO, MOORE, DUFF and DYER when the players who actually want to play like MILNER, TAYLOR, EDGAR, CARROLL, N'ZOGBIA and even HUNTINGTON get treat like shit or just get plain left out!!! It's a disgrace - Taylor for Captain next season!!!!!!! GEORDIE player needs to be captain up here!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 23, 2007 Share Posted April 23, 2007 Roeder cannot make the big decisions!!! He insists on playing CARR, BABAYARO, MOORE, DUFF and DYER when the players who actually want to play like MILNER, TAYLOR, EDGAR, CARROLL, N'ZOGBIA and even HUNTINGTON get treat like s*** or just get plain left out!!! It's a disgrace - Taylor for Captain next season!!!!!!! GEORDIE player needs to be captain up here!!!! The last person to captain Newcastle to a trophy was a Jock, the last one to win a domestic trophy was from Yorkshire and the last to win the league a Jock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WalkervilleMag Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I say keep Roeder, he is out of contract at the end of next season. With Owen back and Ameobi, and a clear out of the trash like Bramble,Babyaro,Carr,Moore,Dyer and some new faces brought in and see what happens. No Europe, so i expect us to be at least top 6 next season. Plus, for those that what a change, who is available ?. Most of the candidates on Shephards list turned us down last time and we ended up with Souness. and i doubt they would say yes now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Roeder cannot make the big decisions!!! He insists on playing CARR, BABAYARO, MOORE, DUFF and DYER when the players who actually want to play like MILNER, TAYLOR, EDGAR, CARROLL, N'ZOGBIA and even HUNTINGTON get treat like shit or just get plain left out!!! It's a disgrace - Taylor for Captain next season!!!!!!! GEORDIE player needs to be captain up here!!!! Mongtastic. Good player with leadership qualities needs to be captain. Birthplace irrelevant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I say keep Roeder, he is out of contract at the end of next season. With Owen back and Ameobi, and a clear out of the trash like Bramble,Babyaro,Carr,Moore,Dyer and some new faces brought in and see what happens. No Europe, so i expect us to be at least top 6 next season. Plus, for those that what a change, who is available ?. Most of the candidates on Shephards list turned us down last time and we ended up with Souness. and i doubt they would say yes now. We're damned if we do and damned if we don't, it's not a good situation to be in. Roeder is not good enough but knowing our luck we would probably end up with worse than we've already got. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WalkervilleMag Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Bruce,Curbs,McClaren when he is sacked in the summer, is probably the shortlist. any of them considerbley better than Roeder ? I very much doubt it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 This rumour that he's lost the dressing room worries me a bit. You can't do anything without the support of the players. His whole reaction after the Alkmaar game (which was his feck-up) seemed wrong. He blamed the players and singled out Bramble because his mistake led to a goal. Nothing is more guaranteed to alienate a manager from his team than that sort of behaviour. There's a story that a similar thing happened at West Ham. Things were going well, and suddenly he lost it with half the team. Long-term the Chairman is a bigger problem than the Manager, but I voted for a change. Overall, he's made the best of a difficult job, but I'm not confident Roeder can turn things back round. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I say keep Roeder, he is out of contract at the end of next season. With Owen back and Ameobi, and a clear out of the trash like Bramble,Babyaro,Carr,Moore,Dyer and some new faces brought in and see what happens. No Europe, so i expect us to be at least top 6 next season. Plus, for those that what a change, who is available ?. Most of the candidates on Shephards list turned us down last time and we ended up with Souness. and i doubt they would say yes now. Errickson,Koeman,Hector Cuper=all better then Roeder Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now